Search Results

1. 24 unit owners of Shed 24 Princess Wharf, 143 Quay Street [2013] NZWHT Auckland 13 [pdf, 89 KB]

   1 [2013] NZWHT AUCKLAND 13 UNDER the Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2006 IN THE MATTER of a reconsideration of the Chief Executive’s decision under section 49 CLAIM NO. 6990 to 7013: 24 unit owners of Shed 24 Princess Wharf, 143 Quay Street ELIGIBILITY DECISION OF THE CHAIR OF THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL The Claim [1] Shed 24, Princess Wharf is a nine level apartment complex constructed on the outer north west area of...

2. YM v DD Ltd [2024] NZDT 54 (26 January 2024) [pdf, 129 KB]

   ...something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehearing, you can apply online, download a form from the Disputes Tribunal website or obtain an application form from any Tribunal office. The application must be lodged within 20 working days of the decision having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Reheari...

3. FH v TI Ltd [2023] NZDT 263 (29 May 2023) [pdf, 172 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 263 APPLICANT FH RESPONDENT TI Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. The applicant’s name is changed to FH. 2. TI Ltd is to pay the sum of $2,975.00 to FH on or before Monday 19 June 2023. Reasons: 1. In June 2022, the [netball team] manager for FH, UN, booked accommodation for the team and coaches from 28 August to 2...

4. DG & J Ltd v BM [2024] NZDT 327 (23 April 2024) [pdf, 89 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 327 APPLICANT DG RESPONDENT BM APPLICANT'S INSURER (if applicable) J Ltd The Tribunal orders: BM is to pay $4,224.10 to J Ltd on or before 12 May 2024. REASONS 1. On 28 October 2023 DG had attended the speedway in [Town]. Upon leaving, DG drove along the gravel road leading from the speedway track to the intersection...

5. FP v T Ltd [2023] NZDT 635 (17 November 2023) [pdf, 186 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 635 APPLICANT FP RESPONDENT T Ltd The Tribunal orders: T Ltd is to pay FP $4,132.00 on or before 6 December 2023. Reasons Introduction 1. In November 2022 T Ltd prepared and laid lawn seed at FP’s house. 2. FP claims $4,132.00 being the price paid for the preparation and laying of the lawn. 3. The issues to be resolved are:...

6. [2023] NZEnvC 046 Save the Maitai Incorporated v Nelson City Council [pdf, 246 KB]

   ...case event: 23 February 2023 Date of Decision: 15 March 2023 Date of Issue: 15 March 2023 - ., • , <C' .. ~- ~ 7cou~ 2 _______________________________________________________________ DECISION OF THE ENVIRONMENT COURT ON APPLICATION FOR WITNESS SUMMONS _______________________________________________________________ A: The application for witness summons is granted. REASONS Introduction [1] This decision is in respect of an application for witness summo...

7. ME v TK [2014] NZIACDT 39 (25 March 2014) [pdf, 95 KB]

   ...25 March 2014 2 DECISION Introduction [1] The complainant was in New Zealand unlawfully and sought the adviser’s assistance to apply for a visa. [2] The adviser embarked on a course where he repeatedly filed unmeritorious requests, then made complaints on the same grounds. The responses from Immigration New Zealand and the Minister made it clear why his actions were inappropriate. He persisted. [3] He then lodged an appeal out of time; it could not be filed, and...

8. Wai 3300, 2.6.011 Memorandum directions of Chief Judge Dr C L Fox following inquiry design judicial conference [pdf, 512 KB]

   ...claimants in their kōrero. Claim participation and eligibility 36. Crown counsel advised that the Crown had not yet conducted a thorough claim-by-claim analysis with respect to eligibility issues, in part to avoid an overly adversarial approach. Counsel requested the Tribunal and counsel to consider whether such a claim analysis was necessary or desirable at this stage, prior to the wānanga takiwā. 37. Several claimant counsel sought a further opportunity to file statements of claim for...

9. Sharma v Manchanda [2018] NZIACDT 9 (23 March 2018) [pdf, 133 KB]

   ...The application Mr Manchanda prepared was a failed lodgement with Immigration New Zealand (INZ), due to the absence of a current police certificate; [2.2] At that point, the complainant was in New Zealand unlawfully and had limited options to request a visa, as generally a person who is in New Zealand without a current visa cannot apply for a visa; and [2.3] When the complaint was made, the Registrar required that Mr Manchanda provide a copy of his file, but he did not provide f...

10. Disputes-Tribunal-Amendment-Bill_FINAL.pdf [pdf, 1.5 MB]

    ...proceedings in the District Court. 20 I am progressing a separate proposal through the Regulatory Systems (Justice) Amendment Bill package to provide Disputes Tribunal referees the power to order a respondent to pay the cost of the filing fee back to the applicant where the applicant’s claim has been wholly or partially successful. This will help ensure that the costs do not fall on those who have been wronged or limit access to justice [SOU-24-MIN- 0074]. 21 Based on the predic...