12972 items matching your search terms
(Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1425 APPLICANT TX and BX RESPONDENT Y Limited The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. Mr and Mrs X had a motel management contract with Y under which they were paid a weekly management fee. They claim $30,000.00 from Y for breaching that contract by deducting $26,834.50 from their management fee for 22 w...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 305 APPLICANT IV RESPONDENT O Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim by IV against O Ltd is dismissed. Reasons 1. In July last year, O Ltd entered into a contract to move, the contents of IV’s house in [region 1] to [region 2]. On receipt of the items at her new home, IV discovered that several items were missing and many items were...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 147 APPLICANT LJ Ltd RESPONDENT DS Ltd The Tribunal orders: DS Ltd is to pay LJ Ltd $3,881.25 including GST on or before 13 September 2022. Reasons 1. LJ Ltd’s farm manager moved from [location redacted] to [location redacted] in May 2019. DS Ltd moved the manager’s belongings in a 20...
...out payment terms, and did not provide invoices. The circumstances were: [6.2.1] After Ms Tangilanu was licensed, she did not take any steps to address the obligations contained in clause 8 of the 2010 Code. [6.2.2] On 8 March 2011, Ms Tangilanu claimed a fee of $300, and did not provide an invoice. The responses [7] Ms Tangilanu did not file a statement of reply; she was not required to do so if she accepted the contents of the Statement of Complaint. [8] The complainant did not...
...ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 338 APPLICANT X School RESPONDENT H Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. H Ltd is to pay X School $27,633.52 on or before the 4th day of August 2023. 2. The counterclaim is dismissed. Reasons: Introduction: 3. In September of 2019 the X School Hall was deemed structurally unsound. On the 25th day of October 2019 X School (X) and H Ltd (H) entered a contract to remedy the structural integrity of...
...already in New Zealand on a visitor visa granted on the basis of guardianship of her younger son (her son), who was here on a student visa. This required her to remain in New Zealand while her son was here. An exemption to that condition was requested by Mr Wan to permit her to travel to China without him. It was declined by Immigration New Zealand (Immigration NZ), but Mr Wan did not tell her. She duly travelled to China, in breach of her visa. [2] A complaint was made to the I...
...number, these are essentially multiple proceedings in which plaintiffs are defendants and vice versa. They are proceedings which were removed from the Employment Relations Authority and there have been multiple iterations of pleadings. [4] The claim now in issue is one brought by Malcolm Beattie and Anthony Regan against PEGL and BA Partners Limited (in liquidation and receivership) (BAPL) although it is acknowledged and accepted that the liquidation status of BAPL and the abse...
...transferred the 2 house’s title back to the Applicant for $400,000.00. The former son in law’s parents had loaned him $200,000.00 to help finance the purchase of the property. [3] About three years later the former son in law registered a claim over the property, and shortly thereafter he issued proceedings under the Property (Relationships) Act 1976 seeking to set aside the prenuptial agreement and the sale of the property by the Applicant’s daughter to the Applican...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 240 APPLICANT VN RESPONDENT SC Ltd The Tribunal hereby orders: SC Ltd to pay VN $6,000.00 on or before 5pm on Wednesday 14 December 2022. Reasons: 1. On 6 February 2022, SC Ltd provided VN with a quotation to build a deck and bench seats (“the building works”) at her property at [Address]. SC Ltd commenced the buil...
...2013] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT CHRISTCHURCH [2013] NZEmpC 213 CRC 23/12 IN THE MATTER OF an application for permanent non- publication orders AND IN THE MATTER of an application for costs BETWEEN DR X Applicant AND A DISTRICT HEALTH BOARD Respondent Hearing: On the papers filed by the applicant on 1 October 2013 and by the respondent on 10 October 2013 Appearances: Hanne Janes, counsel for the applicant Paul...