12972 items matching your search terms
...[2025] NZLCRO 003 Ref: LCRO 032/2024 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a decision of the [Area] Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN MP Applicant AND LG Respondent The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. DECISION Introduction [1] The applicant, MP, has applied for a review of a determination by the [Area] Standard...
...account all matters that have been raised by the applicants and the evidence filed in support, but have chosen to focus on the following issues that relate to the trustees’ core duties: (a) Was the failure to convene a Special General Meeting upon request a breach of duty? (b) Was the issuing of a trespass notice to Diana Ellis a breach of the duty of impartiality? (c) Was the delay in applying to the Māori Land Court for appointment of trustees a breach of the trustees...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2016] NZDT 1473 APPLICANT UT RESPONDENT ET The Tribunal hereby orders: ET is to pay the sum of $1,463.75 to UT on or before 15 August 2016. Reasons: 1. In late 2013, ET was engaged by UT and her partner DM to build a driveway fence on the boundary with their neighbours NC and KC. As built, the fence encroached to some deg...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 15 APPLICANT EC RESPONDENT CF Ltd SECOND RESPONDENT DE The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. On 13 February 2021, after drinking elsewhere, EC visited the NC in [City A], operated by CF Ltd. His memory of his visit is hazy. The next day, he was horrified to see that his credit c...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 462 APPLICANT LC APPLICANT NS RESPONDENT O Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. O Ltd must supply, at its cost, a pink “[redacted]” single bed headboard to LC and NS within 21 days of the date of this order. 2. If O Ltd fails to comply with order 1 above by the due date, O Ltd must pay LC and NS the sum of $500.00 immediately....
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 271 APPLICANT LN RESPONDENT HN SECOND RESPONDENT FN The Tribunal orders: 1. FN shall, by no later than 15 May 2024, update the NAIT information on the 23 calves that he tagged, to show that ownership of the calves is transferred / reverted to LN. 2. If this is not completed by 15 May 2024, FN must pay LN $9,200.00 immediatel...
...arbitration tribunal. We recommend you discuss these options, and potential funding for them through Budget 2018, with your Ministerial colleagues and advise us of your preferred approach. Executive summary 3. Most Canterbury earthquake insurance claims have been settled using existing legal processes and dispute resolution schemes. Processes for settling claims, and resolving insurance disputes, have evolved since the earthquakes to deal with an unprecedented number of claims....
...enable the Trust to open a bank account. Given this, Liana Poutu with the support of the other active trustees have applied to remove Mr McDonald as a responsible trustee for cause, per s 240 of Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 (the Act) (Removal Application). [2] Rarely are removal applications clear-cut, but this is one of those occasions. Mr McDonald confirmed in open court that he was not prepared to comply with the requests made by his co-trustees in circumstances where there...
...they oppose a rehearing on the basis that Harvey Karaitiana had taken no steps to replace deceased trustees, despite several attempts by Whenua Kete (the Trust administrator) to contact Harvey Karaitiana about this issue. Further, the rehearing application was filed late, so the respondents argue that there is no basis for the Court to allow the application to proceed, as it could have been made within the statutory timeframes. [3] The first issue is whether I am prepared to accept...
...Incorporated Society) are the most appropriate representatives for the people of the Ahuriri Hapū. He also seeks an interim injunction until the question has been answered. [2] The respondents and Mana Ahuriri Incorporated Society (MAI) oppose the application on the basis that first, the applicant has no standing to bring the proceedings and, second, that the application is misconceived. [3] The Crown also seeks to be involved in these proceedings as an interested party. Crown co...