12972 items matching your search terms
MARS NZ LTD V MCWU & ANOR WN 11 May 2010 IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT WELLINGTON [2010] NZEMPC 53 WRC 6/10 IN THE MATTER OF an application for injunction AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for costs BETWEEN MARS NEW ZEALAND LIMITED Plaintiff AND MANUFACTURING AND CONSTRUCTION WORKERS UNION INC First Defendant AND SIMON BOOTH AND OTHERS Second Defendants Hearing: by memoranda of submissions filed on 14 and 28 April 2010 Judgment: 11 May 201...
...job description, no proper wage and time records and no record of any holiday pay having been paid to the defendant. There was even a dispute over Mrs Fair’s wage entitlement. [3] In its determination, 1 the Authority upheld Mrs Fair’s claim finding that her dismissal by the plaintiff had been unjustified. She was awarded a total of $15,459.15 for wage arrears, holiday pay and loss of wages resulting from her dismissal along with compensation of $1,000 for non-economic los...
...WELLINGTON [2017] NZEmpC 152 [1 December 2017] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT WELLINGTON [2017] NZEmpC 152 EMPC 65/2017 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of an application for strikeout of challenge BETWEEN PERFORMANCE CLEANERS ALL PROPERTY SERVICES WELLINGTON LIMITED Plaintiff AND IOANA CHINAN Defendant Hearing: (on the papers dated 4 and 20 July, 1 and 18 Sep...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 8 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 531 APPLICANT MC APPLICANT TC RESPONDENT B Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim is dismissed. 2. The counter-claim is dismissed. Background 1. In October 2022, MC and TC booked a 5-day [trek] with B Ltd. 2. The cost was $7,500.00. 3. MC and TC arrived at the [ranch] on 17 April 2023 for the commencement of t...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 6 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 466 APPLICANT FN APPLICANT NH RESPONDENT K Ltd SECOND RESPONDENT O Ltd The Tribunal orders: K Ltd is to pay FN and NH $5,421.00 by 15 September 2023. Background 1. NH and FN own a property on [Address]. They wanted to carry out a two-lot subdivision. 2. They contacted K Ltd, a surveying business i...
Page 1 of 2 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 289 APPLICANT UE and QO RESPONDENT CO Ltd The Tribunal orders: The dispute is adjourned to a date to be fixed before Referee Hayes with ½ a day allocated for an in person hearing. Reasons: 1. The adjournment was required as there was insufficient time to conclude today’s hearing and the parties needed the opportunity to file fur...
WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL CLAIM NO: TRI-2008-101-000045 BETWEEN ALISON MARGARET HEARN, MURRAY DEANS AND HARTHAM TRUSTEES LIMITED AS TRUSTEES OF THE A HEARN FAMILY TRUST Claimant AND PARKLANE INVESTMENTS LIMITED (NOW BOULCOTT INVESTMENTS GROUP LIMITED) First Respondent AND EMPA GROUP CONSULTANTS LIMITED Second Respondent AND WELLINGTON CITY COUNCIL Third Respondent AND RAJU MORAR, NEESHA MORAR AND ISHWERAL MORAR AS TRUSTEES OF THE I & R...
...eventual redundancy. She also believes staff spread malicious rumours about her and that both within and outside the workplace she was the victim of sexual harassment. These grievances did not, however, motivate Ms Sansom to bring a personal grievance claim under the Employment Relations Act 2000. [7] But she has made a number of requests under the Privacy Act 1993 for access to personal information held by the Department. [8] In these proceedings Ms Sansom complains that in respondi...
...05928: DAVID AND REBECCA SPEIRS AS TRUSTEES OF THE SPEIRS FAMILY TRUST ELIGIBILITY DECISION OF THE CHAIR OF THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL Background [1] Rebecca Speirs on behalf of the Speirs Family Trust has filed an application for reconsideration of the Chief Executive’s decision made under section 48 of the Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2006 (the Act). [2] Section 49 of the Act provides that claimants may apply to the Chair seeking...
...applications lodged by Auckland Council and s274 parties; also that the Brabants were on the Court record jointly as Counsel for WML; and that as liquidator Mr Whittfield needed to resolve the question of legal representation (if any) with respect to the claims for costs. [6] Messrs Brabant further recorded that Mr Whittfield had requested that the Court be advised that he had been appointed liquidator and that all further correspondence should be addressed to him (he indicated that he...