12971 items matching your search terms
IN THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2013] NZDT 348 BETWEEN AFS FIRST APPLICANT AND AFT SECOND APPLICANT AND ZUD FIRST RESPONDENT AND ZUE SECOND RESPONDENT Date of Order: 2 July 2013 Referee: Referee Robertshawe ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that ZUE is to pay to AFS and AFT the sum of $10,063.02 within 28 days. Facts [1] On 9 December 2006, AFS and AFT entered i...
...be cited as: Lohr v Accident Compensation Corporation [2016] NZHRRT 31] 2 [2] In about July 2011 the Accident Compensation Corporation (ACC) commenced an investigation into Dr Lohr’s practice with a view to determining whether ACC payment claims submitted by him (and by entities associated with him) were bona fide. The more particular concerns, as outlined by Ms K Eland for ACC in her evidence, included: [2.1] Duplication of claims made. [2.2] Questions about accident cause fo...
...memorandum of counsel was filed by the trustees together with the relevant account information. Further directions were issued by the Court on 20 June 2018 with a view to setting a hearing date in relation to both the partial termination and succession applications. The Court requested the parties indicate their availability for proposed Court dates. [14] Affidavits of the applicants were then filed, dated 28 and 29 June 2018. Further directions were issued on 4 July 2018 for the...
IN THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2016] NZDT 952 BETWEEN DL LIMITED APPLICANT AND VO RESPONDENT Date of Order: 17 June 2016 Referee: Referee Jaduram ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that VO is to pay DL Limited $6,649.20 by Wednesday 6 July 2016. Facts [1] VO took out a loan from DL Limited of $8,598.00 so he could purchase a motor vehicle. The loan was secured against that motor vehicle. The loan and security...
...[12] An essential point raised by the Applicant is that the consent of all three Trustees was required for any decisions made by the Trust. In this light he objected to the Practitioner having undertaken work for the Trust that had been done at the request of his wife, about which he claimed to have no knowledge. This appeared to be the basis of his objection that he, the Applicant, ended up paying for a bill in relation to work in respect of which he was unaware. [13] In reply...
299 Aotea MB 153 IN THE MAORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AOTEA DISTRICT A20110011066 UNDER Section 18(1)(a), Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Manukōrihi 1B Section 2 BETWEEN TAIMUTU TE ARIKI O KAHUKURA Applicant AND ANDREA MOORE Respondent Hearing: 288 Aotea MB 157, dated 10 August 2012 286 Aotea MB 29, dated 22 June 2012 280 Aotea MB 42, dated 24 February 2012 (Heard at New Plymouth) Judgment: 22 March...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 784 APPLICANT X Ltd RESPONDENT EK The Tribunal orders: 1. On the result of the claim and counter claim between the parties, EK is ordered to pay X Ltd a total of $5,597.46, made up of $11,257.46 less the $5,660.00 ordered against X Ltd, on or before 11 October 2024. 2. The reminder of the claim by X Ltd of $2,573.06 and the non-liability
...March 2021 declining to cover for a treatment injury. [2] The appellant submits that she ought to be entitled to cover for a treatment injury because she suffered an injury because of treatment. [3] The Corporation’s position is that the claim does not meet the statutory criteria for cover of a treatment injury. Background [4] On 8 March 2019, an ACC injury claim form was filed for a sensitive claim said to relate to an event on 8 March 2014. The claim form indicated that...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 351 APPLICANT GD RESPONDENT T Ltd The Tribunal orders: T Ltd is to pay GD $920.00 on or before 31 May 2024. Reasons: 1. GD accepted an estimate from T Ltd to undertake painting work on the outside of her rental property in [city]. GD paid a deposit of $5,034.13. Before work started GD cancelled the work and asked for her deposit ba...
...NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2020] NZEmpC 81 EMPC 130/2019 IN THE MATTER OF challenges to determinations of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF application for further disclosure BETWEEN AHMED ALKAZAZ Plaintiff AND ASPARONA LIMITED First Defendant AND DELOITTE LIMITED Second Defendant AND DELOITTEASPARONA LIMITED Third Defendan...