12971 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 6 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 773 APPLICANT BD RESPONDENT F Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim is dismissed. 2. BD is to collect the E bike currently in the possession of F Ltd on or before 8 January 2024. If the E bike is not collected by BD by that date, or such later date as agreed between the parties, F Ltd can dispose of the bike as it sees fit....
...Section 49 of the Act provides that a claimant may apply to the Chair seeking a review of a decision that their claim does not comply with the eligibility criteria within 20 working days of receiving notice of the decision. On receiving such an application I must decide whether or not the claim meets the eligibility criteria. [4] I have considered the following documents in conducting my review: The application for review and attached information. The submission dated 3...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 6 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 236 APPLICANT QN RESPONDENT HO APPLICANT'S INSURER B Ltd The Tribunal orders: HO is to pay the sum of $1,060.00 to B Ltd on or before Monday, 12 June 2023. REASONS 1. QN owns a rental property at [address 1] (“the Property”). There was previously...
...decision is to be cited as Greenslade v Commissioner of Police (Privacy Act) [2021] NZHRRT 54.] IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2021] NZHRRT 54 I TE TARAIPIUNARA MANA TANGATA 2 [2] To be eligible to be appointed as a Police constable an applicant must first graduate from the Royal New Zealand Police College (Police College). Accordingly, Mr Greenslade applied to join Police College. In his application Mr Greenslade disclosed that he had dyslexia. To be admitted to Police...
...COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2023] NZEmpC 46 EMPC 20/2023 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for interim non- publication order BETWEEN MW Plaintiff AND SPIGA LIMITED Defendant Hearing: On the papers Appearances: A Mapu, advocate for plaintiff Judgment: 28 March 2023 INTERL...
(Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2020] NZDT 1431 APPLICANT EJ RESPONDENT BC RESPONDENT INSURER (if applicable) MHI The Tribunal hereby orders, on the claim and counter-claim: BC is to pay $5885.75 to EJ on or before 27 August 2020. Reasons 1. EJ and BC were the drivers involved in a motor vehicle collision on Fred Taylor Drive in February 2020. EJ was driving on the flush median and BC was
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 172 APPLICANT PV RESPONDENT OS SECOND RESPONDENT B Ltd APPLICANT'S INSURER (if applicable) J Ltd The Tribunal orders: OS and B Ltd is to pay J Ltd $3,922.28 by Wednesday 7 June 2023. Reasons Background 1. PV was in the left hand lane at a roundabout and OS was on the right lane at th...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 141 APPLICANT MT RESPONDENT CE Ltd The Tribunal orders: CE Ltd is to pay MT the sum of $421.48 on or before 10 September 2022. Reasons: 1. In June 2021 MT entered a 12 month contract with CE Ltd for internet and phone services. The plan she chose included unlimited data. MT experienced connectivity issues during the Aug...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 366 APPLICANT UO RESPONDENT DU The Tribunal orders: DU, also known as DU, is to pay UO $10,800.00 on or before 23 August 2023. Reasons: 1. In September 2022 UO contacted U Ltd about a quote for a shed, and dealt with someone who identified himself as DU. 2. A quote was provided, and after some emails back and...
...(Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 426 APPLICANT QC RESPONDENT KN The Tribunal orders: 1. KN is to pay QC $800.00 on or before 01 August 2023. 2. The balance of the claim is dismissed. Reasons Introduction 1. In or around early June 2022 QC and KN began discussing a room that was available in KN’s flat to be sub leased to QC. On 3 July 2022 they entered into a Tenant/ Sublettee agreement which set...