12946 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 472 APPLICANT T Ltd RESPONDENT EL The Tribunal orders: The application is dismissed. Introduction: Reasons: 1. T Ltd had filed a previous application with the Disputes Tribunal being [file number]. Under this application V Ltd was ordered to pay T Ltd for an outstanding debt. 2. V Ltd went into liquidation...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 292 APPLICANT OX RESPONDENT B Ltd The Tribunal orders: B Ltd is to pay OX $334.99 within 30 days of the date of this order. Reasons: 1. OX purchased a pair of [headphones] from [retail store] on 19 October 2019 for $334.99. 2. In late 2022-early 2023, OX noticed that the right earbud kept dyin...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 310 APPLICANT BI RESPONDENT NX The Tribunal orders: NX is to pay BI the sum of $23,000.00 on or before 12 June 2024. Reasons: 1. On 14 January 2024 NX was driving on [road]. She was distracted by a friend in her car who was crying. This caused NX to collide with a parked car on the side of the road. 2. The parked car was owned...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 161 APPLICANT DE and KE T/A D&K Rentals RESPONDENT TL The Tribunal orders: 1. The name of the applicant has been corrected to the names of the partners t/a D&K Rentals 2. TL is to pay $13,417.14 to DE and KE t/a D&K Rentals on or before 14 October 2022. REASONS Brief Details of Claim 3. On 14 Marc...
...September 2009. 245 Aotea MB 125 [3] The issues for consideration are whether it is still appropriate to grant an injunction as sought, whether the Board has acted in contempt and whether costs are now properly payable. Background [4] By application received on 24 July 2009 the Animal Health Board requested the Registrar to convene meetings of beneficial owners for Mangahouhou 1, Oraukura 1, Waihi Kahakaharoa 8A, 8B and Waipapa 2B 2A. The purpose of the proposed meetin...
Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 438 APPLICANT Q Ltd RESPONDENT B Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim by Q Ltd is dismissed. 2. BH Ltd is added as the respondent. Reasons: 1. B Ltd is the trading name of BH Ltd (referred to in this decision as B Ltd). 2. On 10 January 2023, Q Ltd provided two specialist driver training courses, one for UE and the other for...
Page 1 of 2 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 785 APPLICANT DN RESPONDENT 2nd RESPONDENT WM Ltd FN Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 2. The matter had been adjourned after the last hearing for the parties to consider a settlement. That did not occur, and I am now making a determination. 3. DN (‘the applicant’)...
...circumstances [5] The proceedings against PwC under the Privacy Act [14] The interlocutory applications filed by Ms Guo [15] PWC – THE DISCOVERY APPLICATION [21] The Tribunal’s power to order discovery [21] Pleadings – the statement of claim [25] Pleadings – the statement of reply [27] Assessment – the issues which will determine the scope of discovery [28] Whether formal discovery should be ordered [32] Reasons for formal discovery being ordered [36] Use of discov...
...that appeared to be required. DM and IW filed a claim in the Disputes Tribunal. 2. This is a claim for breach of the guarantee that services are to be provided with reasonable care and skill, as set out in the Consumer Guarantees Act 1993. The Applicants estimated that the repairs would cost about $38,000.00 plus GST, and they claimed the maximum claimable in the Tribunal, $30,000.00. 3. The issues to be determined were as follows: a. Has HD completed the work to the required...
IN THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2013] NZDT 371 BETWEEN AGO APPLICANT AND ZVE RESPONDENT Date of Order: 12 December 2013 Referee: Referee Blyth ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that AGO’s claim be dismissed. Facts [1] The material facts are that AGO became a flatmate of ZVE in June 2013. AGO left in late August 2013. AGO claims that ZVE owes her a refund of $180.00, being on...