Search Results

1. Paterson - Ahiateatua A8B (2013) 31 Tairawhiti MB 109 (31 TRW 109) [pdf, 154 KB]

   ...Walter Paterson, Tom Smiler, Rawinia Paterson, Daniel Paterson. 10. The Court was later notified that Tangiwai Campbell (holding 174.661 shares) wanted her son and the lessee, Isaac Campbell, to be her spokesperson during the hearing. He claimed she opposed the application. It was claimed that Mark Hemotu Campbell also objected. Opposition to the application was also informally received by way of phone calls from Margaret Henry (87.3305 shares), Tom Campbell (87.3305 share...

2. TN v K Ltd [2023] NZDT 649 (1 December 2023) [pdf, 180 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 649 APPLICANT TN RESPONDENT K Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. TN owns a [vehicle]. 2. In 2022 the vehicle suffered an engine failure. K Ltd re-built the engine for TN. The job cost $14,012.97 and was completed in October 2022. 3. TN had re-located to [country] for work. He asked his frie...

3. UJ v TV [2023] NZDT 429 (31 August 2023) [pdf, 179 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 429 APPLICANT UJ RESPONDENT TV The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed Reasons: 1. UJ purchased a used car from TV. The car was advertised on [the Internet], and UJ messaged TV about it. They arranged a time to view the car, and UJ’s wife went, and test drove the car. UJ then purchased the car. Shortly afterw...

4. I Ltd v K Ltd [2023] NZDT 727 (18 December 2023) [pdf, 104 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 727 APPLICANT I Ltd RESPONDENT K Ltd The Tribunal orders: K Ltd trading as ML must pay I Ltd $2,507.68 by 4pm on 22 January 2024. Reasons: 1. The parties rent their respective premises from the same landlord and share a power meter which is on I Ltd’s premises, meaning I Ltd is primarily responsible for the costs of the power. The...

5. QT v L Ltd [2024] NZDT 23 (21 February 2024) [pdf, 201 KB]

   ...something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehearing, you can apply online, download a form from the Disputes Tribunal website or obtain an application form from any Tribunal office. The application must be lodged within 20 working days of the decision having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Reheari...

6. TX v QC Ltd [2023] NZDT 94 (22 March 2023) [pdf, 172 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 94 APPLICANT TX RESPONDENT QC Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. In January 2022, TX purchased a used car from QC Ltd. In August 2022, it broke down and had to be towed to TX’s home. An ECU fault was diagnosed. TX was told that the pins had corroded causing the fault, and that the corro...

7. EM v EN [2024] NZDT 395 (28 May 2024) [pdf, 88 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 395 APPLICANT EM RESPONDENT EN The Tribunal orders: EN is to pay the sum of $575.00 to EM by no later than 10 June 2024. Reasons: 1. EM claims she was driving on [road 1] when EN pulled out of a side road without giving way. EN’s vehicle collided with EM’s vehicle causing damage. EN left the scene without stopping and providin...

8. [2020] NZSSAA 18 (30 October 2020) [pdf, 189 KB]

   ...supervision substantially in excess of that normally required by a child of the same age and sex; or (c) regular supervision from another person in order to avoid substantial danger to himself or others. [12] Section 11D of the Act set out the application process for benefits. Section 11D(1) states that a benefit must not be granted until an applicant has complied with s 11D(2) which requires an application form and any supporting evidence reasonably required by the Chief Executive...

9. BN v AW [2020] NZDT 1480 (8 October 2020) [pdf, 193 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2020] NZDT 1480 APPLICANT BN RESPONDENT AW The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. BN owns the property on [street], Masterton. AW owns an adjoining property at [street], Masterton. Nobody lives in AW’s house on [street], but until recently, the property was used by AW’s brother to store various item...

10. [2018] NZEmpC 63 Lorigan v Infinity Automotive Ltd [pdf, 342 KB]

    ...claimed would be inappropriate. [35] I accordingly dismiss this challenge. Mr Lorigan’s application of 13 March 2018 requesting this Court to “jointly and severally order and compel the defeat, muting and removal of the defendant’s invalid claims of legal professional privilege/s” [36] Mr Lorigan filed a memorandum asserting that Infinity’s claim for legal professional privilege is invalid. 12 Yu v Zespri International L...