Search Results

Search results for claim form.

12946 items matching your search terms

  1. AM and HM v TH and NH [2022] NZDT 69 (24 March 2022) [pdf, 244 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 7 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 69 APPLICANT And Respondent for Counterclaim AM APPLICANT And Respondent for Counterclaim HM RESPONDENT And Applicant for Counterclaim TH RESPONDENT NH And Applicant for Counterclaim The Tribunal orders: AM and HM are to pay $30,000.00 to TH and NH on or before Monday 11 April 2022. Reasons:

  2. MQ v HQ [2021] NZDT 1659 (14 July 2021) [pdf, 99 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1659 APPLICANT MQ RESPONDENT HQ The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim for $986.00 + GST for replacement of fence palings is dismissed. 2. HQ is ordered to remove the doors (and any other similar material) currently attached to the boundary fence between the parties, on or before 31 August 2021. 3. If HQ fail...

  3. HES v Parekh [2019] NZIACDT 36 (29 May 2019 [pdf, 176 KB]

    ...obtain a visitor visa in the cultural marriage category to enter New Zealand to live with the complainant. [2] However, the written client agreement with Ms Parekh’s company was not signed by her and did not name her. Furthermore, the two visa applications lodged by Ms Parekh both wrongly stated that the couple had lived together. Nor did the couple otherwise meet Immigration New Zealand’s criteria for culturally arranged marriages. The applications were therefore unsuccess...

  4. [2016] NZEmpC 33 Lewis v JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A [pdf, 166 KB]

    ...NZEmpC 148 at [117]. 2 JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. v Lewis (also cited as JP Morgan Chase Bank NA v Lewis) [2015] NZCA 255. 3 Lewis v JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. [2013] NZERA Auckland 18. [3] The defendant’s submissions in support of its claims for costs against the plaintiff Robert Lewis are lengthy and comprehensive. [4] First, the defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (the Bank or JPMorgan) says that in view of its success in the Court of Appeal, Mr Lewis should pay it...

  5. ET v SK [2023] NZDT 131 (5 March 2023) [pdf, 200 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 131 APPLICANT ET RESPONDENT SK The Tribunal orders: SK is to pay ET $9,396 by 6 April 2023. Reasons 1. In September 2021, ET bought a campervan that had been advertised on Trade Me from SK for $17,500. SK lives in the [redacted] and so ET also paid another $396 to have him transport it to [Town] where she picked it up. ET p...

  6. [2017] NZEmpC 102 Kaipara District Council v McKerchar [pdf, 176 KB]

    ...determine costs, my present view is that there were no delays attributable to the parties or their counsel, or other factors which may have increased costs unnecessarily to this point. Further, although the case has been concluded on interlocutory applications, my view is that it would not be appropriate simply to deal with costs affecting interlocutory applications generally. The cross-applications for striking out the substantive proceedings had necessarily to be argued intensi...

  7. Mitchell - Estate of Madeline Trotter or Albertina Decima Madeline Trotter (2004) 108 South Island MB 119 (108 SI 119) [pdf, 156 KB]

    IN THE MAORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TE WAIPOUNAMU DISTRICT Place: Present: Date: Application No: Subject: Section: Hearing: Applicant: Introduction Wellington C M Wainwright, Judge Claire Mason, Clerk of the Court 26 Novem ber 2004 A20030007213 Madeline Trotter or Albertina Decima Madeline Trotter 118/93 5 October 2004 Cheryl Kaye Descima Mitchell RESERVED DECISION 108 SI 119 On 18 December 2003, Cheryl Mitchell made an application to the court seek...

  8. Taueki v The Trustees of Horowhenua 11 (Lake) Trust (2011) 274 Aotea MB 191 (274 AOT 191) [pdf, 107 KB]

    ...supporting her position. [14] In addition, Ms Taueki argues that her action in engaging counsel was not to delay the proceedings, on the contrary. She says that additional time for her lawyer who had just taken the case on was required but claims that the judge hearing the application denied the request. However, Ms Taueki says that when Horizon filed briefs one or two days before the hearing an extension was granted. Finally Ms Taueki says that she could think of nothing that s...

  9. [2016] NZEmpC 98 Nisha Alim v LSG Sky Chef New Zealand Ltd [pdf, 144 KB]

    SHABEENA SHAREEN NISHA (NISHA ALIM) v LSG SKY CHEFS NEW ZEALAND LIMITED NZEmpC AUCKLAND [2016] NZEmpC 98 [10 August 2016] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2016] NZEmpC 98 ARC 22/14 IN THE MATTER OF an application for costs AND IN THE MATTER of an application for joinder AND IN THE MATTER of an application for a compliance order BETWEEN SHABEENA SHAREEN NISHA (NISHA ALIM) Plaintiff AND LSG SKY CHEFS NEW ZEALAND LIMITED D...

  10. OWRUG - EiC - S H McKeague - Agriculture (4 Feb 2021) [pdf, 1022 KB]

    ...ORC data and information and collected their own extra science information where required. The ORC do have reliable data that can be used in this process. 3. Preparing for deemed permit replacement is an involved and complex process. 4. The applications that are lodged are comprehensive, address all aspects of the current plan, Plan change 7 and the RMA. 5. The farmers can not deliver the environmental gains they need to make for the rivers on 6 year permits. 6. Farmers can...