Search Results

1. VS v WN [2022] NZDT 221 (30 November 2022) [pdf, 113 KB]

   ...builders found that additional work required. On 26 July, Mr O agreed to the amended amount (after negotiating it down with Mr S). Then, on 3 August, Mr O advised Mr S that he did not want to continue with the work because his bank had declined his application for a loan for the work. 5. VS claim the sum of $3,615.94 being the costs incurred prior to the contract being cancelled. WN claim that the contract was conditional upon WN confirming that it had obtained finance for the work....

2. [2013] NZEmpC 61 Alatipi v CE of the Department of Corrections [pdf, 56 KB]

   ALATIPI V CHIEF EXECUTIVE OF THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS NZEmpC WN [2013] NZEmpC 61 [15 April 2013] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT WELLINGTON [2013] NZEmpC 61 WRC 4/13 IN THE MATTER OF an application for leave to file a challenge out of time BETWEEN WILLIE ALATIPI Intending Plaintiff AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OF THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS Intended Defendant Hearing: By memoranda of submissions dated 4 and 13 March 2013 Counsel: Gregory Bennett, adv...

3. Deliu v New Zealand Law Society [2012] NZHRRT 1 [pdf, 103 KB]

   ...The allegations made against Randerson J [10] In the separate “Bundle of Documents – Randerson J complaint by F Deliu” there is a letter dated 27 May 2010 from Mr Deliu to the Judicial Conduct Commissioner. It opens: I write to lodge a formal complaint against Justice Randerson. The essential grounds of my complaint are that his Honour has: 1. Defamed me to the President of the New Zealand Law Society; 2. Refused to apologize to a fellow court officer as a duty of respect wo...

4. CD v XS LCRO 186 / 2010 (27 May 2011) [pdf, 45 KB]

   ...186/2010 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the Waikato Bay of Plenty Standards Committee 1 BETWEEN MR CD Of North Island Applicant AND MR XS Of North Island Respondent The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. DECISION Background [1] In early 2008 the Applicant personally filed proceedings ag...

5. GQ v SJ [2017] NZDT 1169 (8 March 2017) [pdf, 68 KB]

   IN THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2017] NZDT 1169 BETWEEN GQ APPLICANT AND SJ RESPONDENT Date of Order: 8 March 2017 Referee: Referee: Murphy ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that the claim is dismissed. Facts [1] Mr GQ and Miss SJ were neighbours. Mr GQ claims his vehicle was parked inside his property during the period 22 October 2016 to 24 October 2016 and Miss SJ’s son has caused damage to the bonnet...

6. Te Manutukutuku Issue 17 [pdf, 2.6 MB]

   ...most of the South Island's fisheries be handed over to Ngai Tahu. It did not recommend that all the fisheries within 12 miles of the coast be returned to Ngai Tahu. Entitlement to Sea Fisheries The Waitangi Tribunal rejected the Ngai Tahu claim to 100% of all sea fisheries off their boundaries. The Tri­ bunal found that Ngai Tahu has an exclusive treaty right to the sea fisheries surrounding the whole of their coast­ line to a distance of 12 miles or so. Ngai Tahu also has a Tr...

7. NT v BP Ltd [2022] NZDT 5 (17 January 2022) [pdf, 181 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 5 APPLICANT NT Limited RESPONDENT SECOND RESPONDENT THIRD RESPONDENT BP Limited HN Limited TG Limited The Tribunal orders: 1. BP Limited is to pay to NT Limited t/a BE the sum of $2,000.00 on or before 14 February 2022. Reasons: 1. The applicant purchased products from a company in [Country...

8. EF & QF v JD & QN [2021] NZDT 1690 (20 May 2021) [pdf, 112 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1690 APPLICANT EF APPLICANT QF RESPONDENT JD RESPONDENT QN The Tribunal orders: QN and JD are to pay $307.11 to QF and EF on or before Monday 7 June 2021. Reasons: 1. EF and QF said that after they purchased a house from QN and JD, they discovered the oven was not in working condition and there was a circu

9. Procter [2012] NZWHT Auckland 22 [pdf, 76 KB]

   1 [2012] NZWHT AUCKLAND 22 UNDER the Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2006 IN THE MATTER of a reconsideration of the Chief Executive’s decision under section 49 CLAIM NO. 6853: ROGER GEORGE PROCTER, PAULINE JANICE PROCTER AND GEOFFREY LEONARD PROCTER – 31 The Crowsnest, Whitby, Porirua ELIGIBILITY DECISION OF THE CHAIR OF THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL [1] Roger, Pauline and Geoffrey Procter are the owners of a property a...

10. J Ltd v Q Ltd [2023] NZDT 315 (15 May 2023) [pdf, 109 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 315 APPLICANT J Ltd RESPONDENT Q Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. Q Ltd is to pay $4,000.00 to J Ltd on or before 4pm on 16 June 2023 Reasons: 2. In February 2023 the applicant engaged the respondent to transport two consignments of untreated planks from [Town] to the respondent’s [City] depot. Consignment one was m...