12946 items matching your search terms
1 r 398(1), (2) Form P(R) 1 Affidavit of assets and liabilities Property (Relationships) Act 1976 In the Family Court at ………………………………………………. FAM No: ………………………………………………. ………………………………………………………………………………………………………. [full name] …………………………………………………………………………...
...for at least two years. Rather, she was accompanied by her brother AA and her cousin BB (who she had also met for the first time) who were both drunk. I understand they both held restricted licences. BE was not insured and QG’s insurer declined his claim for the damage. 2. QG claims $5,700.00 from BE, being the $6,000.00 value of his vehicle less $300.00 he sold the wreck for. 3. The issues to be resolved are: a. Did BE cause damage to QG’s property? b. If so, should BE be...
...February 2016] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT CHRISTCHURCH [2016] NZEmpC 16 EMPC 254/2015 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of costs in regard to an application for a stay of proceedings BETWEEN BEST HEALTH PRODUCTS LIMITED Plaintiff AND CHERIE NEE Defendant Hearing: (on the papers by memoranda dated 4, 22 December 2015, 12, 13 January and 16 February 2016)...
...Sampling 8 Fee setting approach 8 Provider rates and hearing activities 8 Fee schedules 8 ACC legal aid operational policy changes 9 Case management 9 Amendments to grants 9 Amendment criteria 9 Non-lawyer costs and agent’s fees 10 Applications received before and after the July 2012 start date 10 New forms 10 Changes to existing policy 10 Reassignment policy 10 Consultation feedback 11 Questions 11 Appendix: Proposed fee schedules 12 ACC Interim Grant only 12...
...Sampling 8 Fee setting approach 8 Provider rates and hearing activities 8 Fee schedules 8 ACC legal aid operational policy changes 9 Case management 9 Amendments to grants 9 Amendment criteria 9 Non-lawyer costs and agent’s fees 10 Applications received before and after the July 2012 start date 10 New forms 10 Changes to existing policy 10 Reassignment policy 10 Consultation feedback 11 Questions 11 Appendix: Proposed fee schedules 12 ACC Interim Grant only 12...
...McKenzie for plaintiff Ms P Muir and Ms R Judge for defendants DATE OF HEARING: Heard on the papers DATE OF DECISION: 15 October 2020 DECISION OF TRIBUNAL REGARDING COSTS1 [1] In a decision dated 23 March 2020 Ms Watson’s claim was struck out, as it was not within the jurisdiction of the Tribunal. Costs were reserved. See Watson v Employers Mutual Limited (Strike-out Application) [2020] NZHRRT 10. [2] Employers Mutual Limited (EML) has now applied for costs...
...make submissions and respond to any submissions from the other parties. [24] Any application for an order for the payment of costs or expenses under section 51(1)(g) should be accompanied by a schedule particularising the amounts and basis for the claim. [25] The Registrar is requested to report on the extent to which Mr Hakaoro has complied with previous orders the Tribunal has imposed in respect of sanctions, and the steps she has taken to enforce the orders. Timetable [26] The...
...Counsel were subsequently obtained. [7] On 19 August 2014, a telephone conference was held with counsel for the applicant (Mr Anthony Sinclair) and counsel for the respondent trustees (Mr Webb). A timetable, for the filing of any Statement of Claim or further particulars, a statement of defence and evidence for both parties, was agreed to. During the conference, Mr Sinclair advised that the applicant filed the current application before the Court on behalf of David Sinclair who is an...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 344 APPLICANT (FIRST RESPONDENT TO COUNTER-CLAIM) H Ltd (SECOND RESPONDENT TO COUNTER-CLAIM) NB RESPONDENT QU APPLICANT'S INSURER X Ltd RESPONDENT INSURER Q Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. QU and his insurer Q Ltd are to pay X Ltd a total of $10,324.80 on or before Friday 4 August 2023. Of this...
...179/2010 and 180/2010 CONCERNING An application for review pursuant to Section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the National Standards Committee BETWEEN MR IP of Auckland Applicant AND AND SI Respondent (LCRO 179/10) of Auckland SH Respondent (LCRO 180/10) of Auckland DECISION The names and indentifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed....