12959 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1348 APPLICANT NC RESPONDENT MD The Tribunal orders: MD is to pay $665.00 to NC on or before 2 April 2021. Reasons 1. In September 2020 MD approached the neighbour of her tenanted property, NC, to consult him about shrubs/planting that she wished to have removed from a garden that straddles the boundar...
...remedies exist for breach of duty, including in the handling of claims; c. requires consumer insurance policies to be clear and in plain language; d. addresses some long-standing technical issues with insurance law, including: i. rules around information provided by policy holders to insurance intermediaries; ii. the operation of exclusions which are not causative of loss; iii. the ability to claim against an insurer when the policy holder is insolvent; iv. rules around time limi...
...and the completion of detailed written submissions to be included in the Joint Expert Report. 8. Between April 2019 and June 2019, VT 2 Limited issued invoices for the work completed by VT Limited. 9. The amount due has not been paid and the applicants claim the sum of $9,550.75 being $8,682.25 (inclusive of GST) for the work plus $755.00 interest. 10. BN disputes the claim on the basis that he did not have a contract with VT 2 Limited. He also disputes the amount claimed for t...
...183 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WAIARIKI DISTRICT A20110010365 A20130009571 UNDER Sections 289 and 18(1)(a), Te Ture Whenua Maori Act IN THE MATTER OF Te Kaha No. 2C Block KATHLEEN MAY MORRISON Applicant Hearing: 24 January 2012, 48 Waiāriki MB 78-87 (Te Kaha Site visit) 7 March 2012, 51 Waiāriki MB 102-127 8 May 2012, 54 Waiāriki MB 284 29 June 2012, 57 Waiāriki MB 121-124 12 September 2012, 62 Waiāriki MB 41...
GARTH MURRAY CUNNINGHAM v HEALTHALLIANCE NZ LIMITED [2025] NZEmpC 24 [20 February 2025] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2025] NZEmpC 24 EMPC 221/2023 EMPC 2/2024 IN THE MATTER OF challenges to determinations of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for a verification order BETWEEN GARTH MURRAY CUNNINGHAM Plaintiff AND
...provide all the immigration advice, albeit through a local migration company acting as an intermediary. That company is independent of him. [3] The essential issues are whether the company’s staff, unlicensed under New Zealand law, have performed immigration services unlawfully and whether Chinese law qualifies Mr Sun’s professional obligations. BACKGROUND [4] Mr Jianya Sun, also known as Bill Sun, is a licensed immigration adviser. He is resident in Shanghai. [5] In Jan...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 345 APPLICANT LF RESPONDENT JN SECOND RESPONDENT Christchurch Insolvency and Trustee Service THIRD OR RESPONDENT BH FOURTH RESPONDENT C Ltd FIFTH RESPONDENT E Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. JN agreed to store an artwork...
...and other financial information. The request was rejected by the defendant principally upon the grounds that, in terms of s 32(1)(e) of the Act, the requested information was not reasonably necessary to support or substantiate any response to claims made for the purposes of the bargaining. [8] The Court found that the plaintiff‟s written request for the financial information it sought was “fatally flawed” 7 in that s 34(2)(c) of the Act provides that any such request must s...
...Introduction [1] In this proceeding, the plaintiff, Mr Vianney Tuala, has challenged de novo two determinations of the Employment Relations Authority (the Authority). 1 In its first determination dated 13 January 2015, the Authority rejected a claim by Mr Tuala that he had been unjustifiably dismissed by his former employer, the defendant, Linfox Logistics (N.Z.) Limited (Linfox). In its second determination dated 27 February 2015, the Authority made a costs award against Mr Tual...
...27 October 2009 the Privacy Commissioner informed AMEX that he had decided to take no further action and to discontinue the investigation of the complaint. [2.9] The present proceedings were filed on 24 September 2013. The amended statement of claim [3] By amended statement of claim dated 1 August 2014 Mr Hood alleges information privacy principles 2, 6 and 7 were breached by AMEX in three separate respects: [3.1] Collecting information about him from Veda Advantage (NZ) Ltd without...