12971 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 250 APPLICANT BN and UN RESPONDENT ON The Tribunal orders: ON is to pay BN and UN the sum of $3565.00 by no later than 13 July 2023. Reasons: 1. BN and UN arranged for ON, director of B Ltd, to sign off and submit building plans to Council. BN and UN were invoiced the sum of $3565 by B Ltd on 25 August 2022.
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 379 APPLICANT JX RESPONDENT SB The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim by JX against SB is proved. 2. SB is to pay JX the sum of $455.00 on or before 5:00 pm on 23 June 2024. 3. If SB wants to pick up the fridge, he is to arrange a time that is suitable with JX and JX is to make the fridge available. 4. SB is not to pick up the fridge unti...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 618 APPLICANT DW RESPONDENT H Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. On 10 May 2024 DW attempted to book two rooms for two nights at H Ltd’s accommodation, trading as [accommodation], via [website]. 2. She received no confirmation of the booking but noticed that payment had gone through so she con...
...notice of appeal template About the notice of appeal [bookmark: Purpose]To make an appeal to the District Court, a notice of appeal must be filed. Except when the legislation you are filing under states that the appeal is made by way of an originating application (in those circumstances please use the originating application template). How to use the template All the required fields are set out in the template on the following two pages. The sections that you have to fill out are marked with...
...provided the services. [1.3] Mr Kumar provided advice as to the requirements for a job offer that would meet the criteria for applying for a work visa. He provided incorrect advice, and then lodged the application with non-complying documentation, and information showing the complainant had worked outside of the conditions of his permit (without providing an explanation). [2] Mr Kumar did not file a response to the allegations. Accordingly, the Tribunal has evaluated the facts against...
...BOLER Fifth Respondent AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL (for and on behalf of the Assets and Liabilities of the Building Industry Authority) (REMOVED) Sixth Respondent DECISION ON COSTS Adjudicator: S Pezaro 18 November 2010 APPLICATION FOR COSTS [1] Sky Network Television Limited (Sky), the third respondent (now removed), seeks an award of costs against the claimants on the basis that the claim against Sky lacked substantial merit. In determining this ap...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 137 APPLICANT BC APPLICANT KC APPLICANT SS APPLICANT TC RESPONDENT QK The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. After seeing an advertisement for a caravan for sale on social media SS engaged with QK and after viewing the caravan she purchased it. SS alleges QK misrepresented th...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1354 APPLICANT BD and NQ RESPONDENT R & Co Limited The Tribunal orders, on the claim and counter-claim: R & Co. Ltd is to pay the sum of $393.00 directly to NQ on or before 5 March 2021. Reasons 1. BD (as a director) and NQ engaged R & Co Ltd (‘RCL’) in May 2020 to provide conveyancing service...
...TOTAL PROPERTY SERVICES (CANTERBURY) LIMITED [2022] NZEmpC 85 [19 May 2022] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA ŌTAUTAHI [2022] NZEmpC 85 EMPC 423/2021 IN THE MATTER OF an application for leave to extend time to file a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN CREST COMMERCIAL CLEANING LIMITED Applicant AND TOTAL PROPERTY SERVICES (CANTERBURY) LIMI...
...Act 1982 and 1992) ___________________________________________________________________________ [1] At issue in this appeal is the correctness of a decision made by the Accident Compensation Corporation on 1 March 2019 declining the appellant’s claim for an additional lump sum payment under sections 78 and 79 of the Accident Compensation Act 1982. Background [2] Mr Savage suffered various injuries in the 1980s, all of which were covered by ACC: [a] 1 July 1983: Injury to left hi...