12972 items matching your search terms
...submissions, response and final decisions April 2012 Although all reasonable steps have been taken to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this document, the Ministry of Justice disclaims any and all responsibility for any inaccuracy, error, omission, or any other kind of inadequacy, deficiency, or flaw in, or in relation to, the information; and fully e...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 747 APPLICANT IC RESPONDENT X Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. IC engaged X Ltd to move household goods for his family from [City 1] to [City 2]. IC claims the costs of repair or replacement for items he says were damaged by X Ltd, seeking $8,774.00 in compensation. 2. X Ltd says this work was arranged...
...something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehearing, you can apply online, download a form from the Disputes Tribunal website or obtain an application form from any Tribunal office. The application must be lodged within 20 working days of the decision having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Reheari...
...of a P, V, I or O licence endorsement for the period of the term of the endorsement as the Director may consider necessary. The Memorandum of Understanding between the Police and the NZTA [31] The Police Vetting Service does not process vetting requests directly from individuals, with the exception of overseas visa requests. Instead, the Vetting Service has agreements with organisations known as “approved agencies”. The NZTA is one of these approved agencies. [32] In 2013 the...
IN THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2014] NZDT 592 BETWEEN AD APPLICANT AND ZW FIRST RESPONDENT AND ZWZ SECOND RESPONDENT Date of Order: 27 May 2014 Referee: Referee Ashcroft ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that the claim is dismissed. Facts [1] This is an unhappy dispute between family members. [2] The applicant (AD) and first respondent (ZW) are two of four surviving adult children of AA and BB. Th...
...HERRETT v ECO FRAME AND MIRROR LIMITED [2023] NZEmpC 184 [27 October 2023] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA ŌTAUTAHI [2023] NZEmpC 184 EMPC 164/2023 IN THE MATTER OF an application for leave to extend time to file a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN JOHN ROTHWELL HERRETT Applicant AND ECO FRAME AND MIRROR LIMITED Respondent Hearing:...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 129 APPLICANT CN RESPONDENT OQ The Tribunal orders: OQ is to pay CN $1,518 on or before 21 April 2023. Reasons: 1. During a storm on 13 February 2022 a number of trees fell onto CN’s property at [Address] causing damage to some native rimu and avocado trees and parts of a fence. CN removed some of the trees and debris b...
...regular price of $75 per month. FA stopped paying his monthly fees in October 2016, and FAA stopped paying in November 2016. [2] Since payments stopped, TZ1 has invoiced a total of $352.00 to FAA and $376 to FA in membership fees and late fees. The applicants now seek a declaration that they are not liable to pay TZ1 the invoiced sums. Issues (a) What are the terms of the contracts regarding cancellation? (b) Was TZ1 entitled to suspend access to the gym? (c) What amount, if any...
...something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehearing, you can apply online, download a form from the Disputes Tribunal website or obtain an application form from any Tribunal office. The application must be lodged within 20 working days of the decision having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Reheari...
...lease concerning stumpage and employment (“the damages application”). 2 [2] The lessee, TPL 4 Limited (“TPL4”), applies to strike out the damages application (“the strike out application”) on the grounds that: (a) The statement of claim does not contain sufficient particulars, is prolix and an abuse of process; and (b) The claim is time barred. [3] TPL4 also seeks summary judgment on any residual aspects of the damages application. This judgment determines the alie...