Search Results

1. Fifita v Tangilanu [2014] NZIACDT 108 (03 October 2014) [pdf, 124 KB]

   ...engaged Ms Tangilanu to assist them. The complaint alleges Ms Tangilanu promised she would get the complainant a work visa, entered a written agreement that did not comply with the Code, failed to make the application promptly, then belatedly made a request to the Minister and later lodged an application with Immigration New Zealand in relation to the husband. Further, after taking the initial step of making a request of the Minister, she did not have an agreement relating to the subsequen...

2. EO v UO & U Ltd [2023] NZDT 257 (30 June 2023) [pdf, 112 KB]

   ...including structural rust. NZ Transport Agency investigated EO’s complaint against U Ltd for issuing the WOF despite the van’s extensive issues and upheld her complaint. Action was taken against U Ltd for issuing the WOF. 3. In a separate Tribunal claim by Ms L, EO and Mr O were ordered to pay $17,066.00 to Ms L by the Tribunal in a decision dated 7 March 2022, as damages for misrepresentation in relation to the WOF for the van. 4. EO claimed that the WOF should not have been is...

3. LE v BI [2024] NZDT 31 (2 February 2024) [pdf, 139 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 31 APPLICANT LE RESPONDENT BI The Tribunal orders: 1. BI is to pay the sum of $180.00 to LE on or before Friday, 1 March 2024. 2. Once BI has made the payment set out in order 1 above, LE is to make the [Brand] baby carrier that she purchased from BI reasonably available for collection by BI. BI (or his nominated agent) is to collect th...

4. Tidmarsh v Glover [pdf, 271 KB]

   CLAIM NO: 01086 UNDER The Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2002 IN THE MATTER OF an adjudication BETWEEN RUSSELL WILLIAM TIDMARSH and JOY ISABELLE TIDMARSH Claimants AND JOHN GLOVER First respondent (Intituling continued next page) Hearing: 5 December 2005 Appearances: Russell Tidmarsh and Christopher Twigley for the Claimants John Glover, the First Respondent in person Jeremy Atkinson for the Second Respondent Raymon...

5. B v ACC [2012] NZACA 5 [pdf, 127 KB]

   ...APPEARANCES/COUNSEL Phillip Schmidt for appellant Dane Tui for respondent DECISIONS [1] The first issue in this appeal is the appellant’s application to reinstate Appeal No. ACA 281/88, which was withdrawn on 7 November 1988 at the Corporation’s request. There is an alternative application before the Authority, under Appeal No. ACA 16/08, being the appellant’s application for leave to appeal out of time, following the Corporation’s objection to the reinstatement of the 1...

6. Clarke v Runanga o Onuku - Te Whanau a Hinemataiao Puhirere Incorporation (2001) 92 South Island MB 225 (92 SI 225) [pdf, 142 KB]

   Minute Book: 92 SI 225 Place: Wellington Present: J.V. Williams, Chief Judge Marie Parker, Clerk of the Court 28 February 2001 Date: Application No: A20000050990 Subject: Section: Chief Judge Te Whanau a Hinemataiao Puhirere Incorporation 30/93 On 22 January I received a letter from counsel for the Runanga 0 Onuku asking what the status of this matter was. Up until receipt of that letter I had thought that the matter had been disposed of. It transpires that a draft decis...

7. George v ACC [2012] NZACA 13 [pdf, 78 KB]

   ...ceased acting? 2 [4] The appellant’s position on the substantive appeal is that his shoulder condition should have cover as a stand-alone injury, and he is seeking a finding and a direction that he is entitled to the benefit of a separate claim for cover for the shoulder injury as at March 1980, when he was in employment. [5] The Corporation’s position is that the only cover available to the appellant is for an injury consequential upon the original injury suffered w...

8. MC v SH [2020] NZDT 1544 (29 May 2020) [pdf, 106 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2020] NZDT 1544 APPLICANT MC RESPONDENT SH The Tribunal hereby orders: The application is dismissed. Reasons: 1. On or about 14 December 2019, SH and MC entered into an agreement whereby SH would make for MC a full upper denture for a cost of $12,000.00 and a lower partial denture for a cost of $5,500.00 (total cost $1...

9. SO Ltd v NI & KI [2023] NZDT 189 (15 May 2023) [pdf, 117 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 189 APPLICANT SO Ltd RESPONDENT NI RESPONDENT KI The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. SO Limited (hereafter SO Ltd) claimed that KI and NI received an unauthorised payment of $5,000 when KI resigned as a director and shareholder of SO Ltd and sought an order for its return. 2. KI...

10. EM v KU [2024] NZDT 662 (15 September 2024) [pdf, 193 KB]

    Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 662 APPLICANT EM RESPONDENT KU The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. In November 2023 EM’s secondary-school-age son BM responded to a [online selling website] advertisement and purchased a [Car] from KU for $10,300.00. EM says while BM worked hard after school to save and pay for this vehicle, EM himself has suffered a loss becau...