12946 items matching your search terms
...ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2025] NZEmpC 81 EMPC 132/2024 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application to strike out proceedings BETWEEN DAYA NAND Plaintiff AND IDEA SERVICES LIMITED Defendant Hearing: 20 February 2025 and by further submissions filed on 21 and 28 February 2025 (Heard at Auckland...
...damage to [car 1]. [car 1] was a high performance car and therefore expensive to repair. 13. The repairers’ costs was $19,812.96 (including the excess). J Ltd have also added a tow charge and storage totalling $250 plus GST. The total amount claimed is therefore $20,100. 46. 14. AQ/MQ had no issues in relation to the costs. Conclusion 15. For the reasons above AQ must pay J Ltd, $20,100.46. Referee: Ms Gayatri Jaduram Date: 13 May 2024 Page 3 of 3...
...BN saw EI’s advertisement on Facebook for a mare she was selling called X. BN purchased X from EI for $250.00 including transport, as a project to train up and sell. On 27 April 2022, BN sold X to UG (BN and UG are referred to together as “the Applicants”). 2. Some months later, UG discovered that X was in foal by which time the pregnancy was quite advanced. The pregnancy did not go well, and X needed specialist care and there was no suitable care on the [City 1]. UG sent X for sp...
...CHRISTCHURCH [2018] NZEmpC 94 [13 August 2018] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT CHRISTCHURCH [2018] NZEmpC 94 EMPC 174/2018 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of an application for leave to amend the statement of claim BETWEEN JACKS HARDWARE AND TIMBER LIMITED Plaintiff AND FIRST UNION INCORPORATED Defendant Hearing: 13 August 2018 Appearances: R Upt...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 660 APPLICANT OQ RESPONDENT N Ltd The Tribunal orders: N Ltd is to pay OQ $8,278.85 by 8 December 2023. Reasons: 1. In June 2022, N Ltd replaced the engine in OQ’s car at a cost of $8,278.85. The engine failed in late October 2022, and OQ claims reimbursement of the replacement cost. 2. Both parties attended the hearings. Mr and Mr...
...NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2022] NZEmpC 71 EMPC 317/2021 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application to join a party BETWEEN GF Plaintiff AND COMPTROLLER OF THE NEW ZEALAND CUSTOMS SERVICE Defendant Hearing: On the papers Appearances: M Dew QC, S Kopu and J Hansen, counsel for plaintiff...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 8 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 607 APPLICANT XD Ltd RESPONDENT QC The Tribunal orders: 1. QC is to pay XD Ltd $5675.18 on or by 1 December 2023. Reasons 2. QC and [his wife] built a new house in [suburb]. Unfortunately, the original builder went into liquidation before the house was completed, leaving them with some $200,000 of work paid for, but for...
LCRO 172/2015 173/2015 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the [Area] Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN WL Applicant AND XC Respondent AND BETWEEN HF Applicant AND XC Respondent DECISION The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. Introduction [1] Ms WL and Mr HF have...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 195 APPLICANT SX RESPONDENT M Ltd APPLICANT INSURER J Ltd The Tribunal orders: M Ltd is to pay $6,094.43 to J Ltd on or before Friday 14 July 2023. Reasons: 1. On 6 October 2022 SX parked her car in an area allocated for staff parking at the rear of the shops where she works. At midday a neighbouring shop wor...
...appreciated, if acceptance is communicated orally, or if we give advice or take (further) action, our ongoing engagement will be on the basis set out in this letter and the material which accompanies it. [21] Mrs YB had asked Mr ZA for advice and requested he write to the bank. In addition, Mrs YB had sent emails to Mr ZA on 20 July 2015, 21 July 2015, 31 July 2015 and 3 August 2015. Mr ZA considered that Mrs YB had instructed him to act. [22] The Committee “accepted that Mr ZA h...