13121 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 510 APPLICANT MW APPLICANT NW RESPONDENT SL SECOND RESPONDENT TE The Tribunal orders: SL and TE are to pay MW and NW $2,737.31 on or before 12 October 2023. Reasons 1. In March 2023, MW and NW bought the property at [Address] by auction from SL and TE. Settlement date was 27 April 2023. A day or two afte...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2019] NZDT 1510 APPLICANT DT RESPONDENT S Ltd The Tribunal hereby orders: 1. S Ltd (S) is to pay the sum of $1,199.00 to DT on or before 14 October 2019. 2. If he has not already done so, DT must return the robot vacuum to S within 14 days of receiving the refund. Reasons: 1. On 4 July 2019, DT purchased a [Redacte...
Minute Book: 92 SI 225 Place: Wellington Present: J.V. Williams, Chief Judge Marie Parker, Clerk of the Court 28 February 2001 Date: Application No: A20000050990 Subject: Section: Chief Judge Te Whanau a Hinemataiao Puhirere Incorporation 30/93 On 22 January I received a letter from counsel for the Runanga 0 Onuku asking what the status of this matter was. Up until receipt of that letter I had thought that the matter had been disposed of. It transpires that a draft decis...
...APPEARANCES/COUNSEL Phillip Schmidt for appellant Dane Tui for respondent DECISIONS [1] The first issue in this appeal is the appellant’s application to reinstate Appeal No. ACA 281/88, which was withdrawn on 7 November 1988 at the Corporation’s request. There is an alternative application before the Authority, under Appeal No. ACA 16/08, being the appellant’s application for leave to appeal out of time, following the Corporation’s objection to the reinstatement of the 1...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 110 APPLICANT QX RESPONDENT XN Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. QX bought a second hand 2017 [motorhome] in 2019. In 2020, when the motorhome had travelled around 8,000 kms, a radiator hose popped off, all the coolant leaked out and the engine overheated, requiring significant repairs. QX says the motorh...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 350 APPLICANT BD RESPONDENT H Ltd The Tribunal orders: BD is to pay H Ltd the sum of $25,050.87 immediately. Reasons 1. The applicant is disputing his liability to pay invoices he received from the respondent for certain work undertaken, and the respon...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 660 APPLICANT OQ RESPONDENT N Ltd The Tribunal orders: N Ltd is to pay OQ $8,278.85 by 8 December 2023. Reasons: 1. In June 2022, N Ltd replaced the engine in OQ’s car at a cost of $8,278.85. The engine failed in late October 2022, and OQ claims reimbursement of the replacement cost. 2. Both parties attended the hearings. Mr and Mr...
CLAIM NO: 01086 UNDER The Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2002 IN THE MATTER OF an adjudication BETWEEN RUSSELL WILLIAM TIDMARSH and JOY ISABELLE TIDMARSH Claimants AND JOHN GLOVER First respondent (Intituling continued next page) Hearing: 5 December 2005 Appearances: Russell Tidmarsh and Christopher Twigley for the Claimants John Glover, the First Respondent in person Jeremy Atkinson for the Second Respondent Raymon...
...ceased acting? 2 [4] The appellant’s position on the substantive appeal is that his shoulder condition should have cover as a stand-alone injury, and he is seeking a finding and a direction that he is entitled to the benefit of a separate claim for cover for the shoulder injury as at March 1980, when he was in employment. [5] The Corporation’s position is that the only cover available to the appellant is for an injury consequential upon the original injury suffered w...
IN THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL WHT: TRI-2007-100-000039 UNDER the Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2006 IN THE MATTER of an Adjudication Claim BETWEEN LOUIS BERNARD LIPSCHITZ and VEROSLAVA LIPSCHITZ L & V LIPSCHITZ TRUST Claimants AND AUCKLAND CITY COUNCIL First Respondent AND RODNEY GRAHAM PRATT Second Respondent