12944 items matching your search terms
...[2024] NZLCRO 069 Ref: LCRO 13/2024 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a decision of the [Area] Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN OB and HG Applicants AND NC Respondent The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. DECISION Introduction [1] The applicants, Ms OB and Mr HG, have applied for review of a decision by t...
...Denekamp,1 dated 31 August 2018. The Tribunal found in that decision that Mr Denekamp had breached professional obligations. [2] The facts relating to the complaint, as found by the Tribunal, are in outline: [2.1] Mr Denekamp received a completed application form for a student visa. [2.2] He had no personal contact with the complainant, accordingly: [2.2.1] He never interviewed the complainant to understand his immigration options. [2.2.2] He did not enter into a written agre...
...the Court to have the proceedings transferred to adjudication under the Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2002 (“WHRS Act”). This was confirmed in the reserve judgment of Judge P S Rollo on 14 March 2003. 1.6 The Owners made an application to the Weathertight Homes Resolution Service (“WHRS”), and their claim was deemed to be an eligible claim under the WHRS Act. The Owners then filed a Notice of Adjudication under s.26 of the WHRS Act on 27 November 2003....
...complainant personally applied for a visitor visa online. An interim visa was granted by Immigration New Zealand on 26 October, to come into effect when the working holiday visa expired and to expire when a decision was made on her visitor visa application. [5] The complainant’s working holiday visa expired on 2 or 3 November 2016. At about this time, she approached Pioneer to obtain entry to an education institute and an accompanying student visa. On 3 November, she signed a...
...[2024] NZLCRO 051 Ref: LCRO 003/2024 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a decision of the [Area] Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN RP Applicant AND TG Respondent DECISION The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. Introduction [1] The applicant, Mrs RP, has applied for review of a decision of the [Area] Standards C...
...Hapü within six months of the signing of the media- tion agreement. It is expected the governing body, Te Röpü Matua, will have the robust mandate required by the claims process to effectively par- ticipate throughout. The hapü have also formed a new claims committee Te Röpü Whenua, comprising three members from both former claims. They will ensure their claims are particularised and filed as required by the Tribunal under the new approach. This agreement is of importance...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 287 APPLICANT KB RESPONDENT OS Ltd SECOND RESPONDENT LP RESPONDENT INSURER (if applicable) J Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. On the late evening of 14 July 2021 KB was driving his car on [Street name] in [Suburb] when he was involved in a collision with a van dr...
LEGAL COMPLAINTS REVIEW OFFICER ĀPIHA AROTAKE AMUAMU Ā-TURE [2021] NZLCRO 030 Ref: LCRO 183/2020 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the [Area] Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN DX Applicant AND SQ Respondent DECISION The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. Introduction [1] Mr D...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 169 APPLICANT OT APPLICANT US RESPONDENT N Ltd RESPONDENT INSURER (if applicable) R Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim by OT and US against N Ltd is dismissed. Reasons 1. OT drove a [vehicle] into the parking area which is part of N Ltd’s business. OT and US now brin...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2020] NZDT 1382 APPLICANT NI RESPONDENT CT SECOND RESPONDENT FM Limited RESPONDENT INSURER GNH Insurance The Tribunal hereby orders: 1. FM Limited is added as a respondent party to the claim. 2. The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. NI was driving home from work on 29 July 2019 at about 7...