13120 items matching your search terms
...unjustifiable and other wise carried out in breach of the defendant’s duties to the plaintiff. In the course of the Authority’s investigation, the defendant reversed that change, restoring the plaintiff to his former position. The plaintiff claimed nonetheless that he had been disadvantaged. The Authority determined 1 that the 1 [2011] NZERA Wellington 2 plaintiff had been effectively returned to his former position and t...
...WELLINGTON [2014] NZEmpC 81 WRC 27/13 IN THE MATTER OF an application for leave to file challenge out of time AND IN THE MATTER of an application to file notice of opposition out of time BETWEEN BRENDAN KELLERMAN Applicant AND STONEWARE 91 LIMITED t/a SWITCHED ON GARDENER Respondent Hearing: (on the papers - by consideration of documents dated 16 August 2013 and 16 April 2014) Judgment: 22 May 2014...
...NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2022] NZEmpC 71 EMPC 317/2021 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application to join a party BETWEEN GF Plaintiff AND COMPTROLLER OF THE NEW ZEALAND CUSTOMS SERVICE Defendant Hearing: On the papers Appearances: M Dew QC, S Kopu and J Hansen, counsel for plaintiff...
LCRO 172/2015 173/2015 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the [Area] Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN WL Applicant AND XC Respondent AND BETWEEN HF Applicant AND XC Respondent DECISION The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. Introduction [1] Ms WL and Mr HF have...
IN THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2014] NZDT 589 BETWEEN AB Ltd APPLICANT AND ZY RESPONDENT Date of Order: 4 March 2014 Referee: Referee Reuvecamp ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that the respondent, ZY, pay the amount of $384.87 to the applicant finance company, AB Limited, on or before 21 March 2014 or in such other manner as the parties may agree in writing. Facts [1] The matter relates to a loan ente...
...mailto:wt.registrar@justice.govt.nz mailto:library@justice.govt.nz mailto:rachel.kerr@justice.govt.nz mailto:firstname.lastname@justice.govt.nz http://www.waitangi-tribunal.govt.nz/ Table of Contents The Waitangi Tribunal and the settlement of historical Treaty claims ........................ 1 A critical role in New Zealand society ..................................................................... 1 A balanced, streamlined inquiry process ....................................................
...details .............................................................................................................. 11 Your legal aid office .................................................................................................... 11 Applications ................................................................................................................... 14 Eligibility ........................................................................................................
...2018 the Tribunal made two orders in favour of Dr Naidu: [1.1] A declaration that there had been an interference with the privacy of Dr Naidu by the refusal by the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons (RACS) to provide access to personal information requested by Dr Naidu under IPP 6. 1 [This decision is to be cited as: Naidu v Royal Australasian College of Surgeons (Costs) [2018] NZHRRT 33] 2 [1.2] A compliance order requiring RA...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 710 APPLICANT DQ RESPONDENT IC The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. In December 2022 DQ purchased an eight-week old purebred [puppy] from IC for $5,000.00. DQ and IC agreed on terms which are contained in the TC Purchase Agreement (“the Agreement”), a copy of which IC provided in evidence. 2. The puppy is...
IN THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2014] NZDT 607 BETWEEN AG Ltd APPLICANT AND ZT Ltd RESPONDENT Date of Order: 6 May 2014 Referee: Referee Costigan ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that ZT Ltd (the respondent) is to pay AG Ltd (the applicant) $1,144.25 on or before 20 May 2014. Facts [1] AG Ltd (the applicant) agreed to hire a stand to ZT Ltd (the respondent) at the [industry event] in 2013 for $2,288.50. It...