13118 items matching your search terms
...Claimant AND ARGON CONSTRUCTION LIMITED First Respondent AND AUCKLAND CITY COUNCIL Second Respondent AND BERNARD MOHAN Third Respondent AND PAUL BAYER (Removed) Fourth Respondent DECISION ON STRIKE OUT APPLICATIONS Dated 8 October 2008 BACKGROUND The strike out applications [1] This decision follows a hearing on 2 September 2008 to determine strike out and removal applications by the first respondent Argon Construction...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 287 APPLICANT KQ APPLICANT LT RESPONDENT SG APPLICANTS’ INSURER J Ltd The Tribunal orders: SG is to pay KQ and LT $4,405.65 on or before Friday 7 July 2023. Reasons: 1. KQ and LT own a home in [City]. SG previously occupied the adjoining property. KQ and LT say that in October 2021 SG damaged the brick b...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 642 APPLICANT DC RESPONDENT T Ltd The Tribunal orders: T Ltd is to pay DC $500.00 by 29 November 2023. Background 1. In February 2020 DC purchased a T Ltd [e-bike] from [bicycle shop] in [town 1]. The price was $8,403.00. 2. In April 2023 the battery for the ebike failed when DC was travelling in the South Island. 3. DC...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 254 APPLICANT H Ltd RESPONDENT KB The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. In late 2019 H Ltd carried out bathroom renovations for KB. H Ltd invoiced her a total of $13,769.40. She has paid $12,000.00. H Ltd claims the balance of $1,769.40. 2. Both parties attended the hearing. H Ltd was represent...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 185 APPLICANT H Ltd RESPONDENT TU, DU and GU as trustees for the U Family Trust The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. H Ltd (Unit D) and TU, and DU and GU as trustees for the U Family Trust (Unit C) own adjoining units at [Address]. During storms on 8 January 2023 and the Auckland Anniversary weekend storm of
Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 652 APPLICANT UE RESPONDENT TF SECOND RESPONDENT KD The Tribunal orders: The Applicant’s claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. UE purchased a boat from TF in February 2024. After the purchase, the boat developed problems and UE had it assessed by a mechanic, SR in [City 1]. She was advised that the engine was not economical to re...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 851 APPLICANT SP RESPONDENT MT The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. SP purchased a car for $8200 that was advertised [online] by MT. 2. SP flew to [City 1] collected the car that had been left out for him and drove 900 odd kms back to [Town]. 3. A few weeks later SP contacted MT to complain about the gea...
...of misconduct, a finding that only the Tribunal could make, and also noting that the Applicant had failed to respond or comply with a requirement pursuant to s 147(2)(a) to produce for the Committee’s inspection certain documents that had been requested. Review application [11] The grounds cited by the Applicant for review were bias, procedural unfairness, error in fact and law, wrong in determining the matter reached the necessary threshold of the New Zealand Law Society Discip...
...Christchurch/Otautahi Appearances: The appellant in person Mr C Light for the respondent Judgment: 4 August 2021 ____________________________________________________________________ RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE C J McGUIRE [Section 360(1) – Claim for cover under former Acts filed after 1 April 2002 Accident Compensation Act 2001] ____________________________________________________________________ [1] At issue on this appeal is a decision dated 26 July 2019 from the...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1643 APPLICANT P Limited RESPONDENT Q Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. Q Ltd is to pay P Ltd a total of $3500.00 on or before Friday 29 October 2021. 2. The counter-claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. In September 2019, P Ltd contracted with Q Ltd to supply and fit 4 new tyres, rims and a 2 inch suspension lift kit...