13118 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1576 APPLICANT HN RESPONDENT FH Limited The Tribunal orders: That the Application is dismissed. Reasons: 1.On the 3rd of January 2021, HN booked 3 tickets at @$175 each for a total $525 with FH Ltd (FH) to be an ”On the Water Spectator America’s Cup Match” for Saturday the 13th of March 2021 departing @...
...[2018] NZEmpC 121 [15 October 2018] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2018] NZEmpC 121 EMPC 221/2018 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for stay of execution BETWEEN SOLID ROOFING LIMITED Plaintiff AND SAMUEL NEWMAN Defendant Hearing: On the papers Appearances: P Vandenberg, agent for plaintiff R Tomkinson, counsel for...
...TRANSPORT EMPLOYEES' UNION INC AK AC 10/09 26 March 2009 IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND AC 10/09 ARC 85/08 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application to strike out part of statement of claim BETWEEN BRIAN ALEXANDER WEBB Plaintiff AND NEW ZEALAND TRAMWAYS AND PUBLIC PASSENGERS TRANSPORT EMPLOYEES' UNION INCORPORATED Defendant Hearing: 25 March 2009 (Heard at Au...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 348 APPLICANT XD RESPONDENT KA The Tribunal orders: KA is to pay XD $1,500.00 on or before 21 July 2023. Reasons: 1. XD bought a fish from someone advertising on [online website]. He now wishes to return the fish and obtain a refund. 2. The first hearing of this claim was set down to be heard by teleconference...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 868 APPLICANT CH RESPONDENT SU APPLICANT'S INSURER (if applicable) X Ltd The Tribunal orders: That SU is to pay to X Ltd the monetary sum of $2,510.00 on or before the 17th January 2025. Reasons Background: 1) On Friday the 16th April 2021, CH who then resided at [Address 1] was the owner of a [vehicle 1] and ha...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 650 APPLICANT HG RESPONDENT N Ltd Order of the Tribunal 1. N Ltd is to pay $14,428.50 to HG by 20 December 2023. 2. The amount ordered includes the deduction of $2,080.00 the applicant owes for N Ltd delivery charges and $300.00 for storage of a TV and Chair. Reasons 1. The issues to be determined in this case are:...
...TALAKAI V AMCOR FLEXIBLES LTD AK AC 14/07 26 March 2007 IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND AC 14/07 ARC 117/05 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for costs BETWEEN SIALE TALAKAI Plaintiff AND AMCOR FLEXIBLES LIMITED Defendant Hearing: By memoranda of submissions filed on 14 February and 20 March 2007 Judgment: 26 March 2007 COSTS JUDGMENT OF CHIEF JUDG...
...NZEmpC AUCKLAND [2013] NZEmpC 102 [5 June 2013] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2013] NZEmpC 102 ARC 43/12 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority IN THE MATTER OF an application for costs BETWEEN CATHERINE TAN Plaintiff AND MORNININGSTAR INSTITUTE OF EDUCATION LIMITED T/A MORNINGSTAR PRESCHOOL Defendant Hearing: By memoranda of submissions filed on 23 May and 4 June 20...
...appointed by the Waitangi Tribunal. You can read the about the name of the inquiry here. Back to top He aha ngā āhuatanga kei roto i tēnei Pakirehua? | What will this Inquiry cover? The Constitutional Kaupapa Inquiry (Wai 3300) will hear claims concerning grievances relating to the constitution, self-government, and the electoral system. The Tribunal has made a preliminary indication that the central themes of the inquiry will likely cover: Tino Rangatiratanga, Mana Motuha...
...requested, and the practitioners gave Mr HS on the telephone from time to time. [9] The main issue concerning the [hardware store] matter was whether Mr HS asked the practitioners to draft submissions for the Disputes Tribunal hearing. Or, as Mr HS claims, were they to provide advice in the form of “notes” or a “letter” about the submissions prepared by Mr HS’s previous lawyer. Complaint [10] Mr HS lodged a complaint with the Lawyers Complaints Service on 27 May...