Search Results

1. QB v OL [2021] NZDT 1563 (7 December 2021) [pdf, 164 KB]

   ...something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehearing, you can apply online, download a form from the Disputes Tribunal website or obtain an application form from any Tribunal office. The application must be lodged within 20 working days of the decision having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Reheari...

2. [2011] NZEmpC 154 Hepburn v Huhtamaki Henderson Ltd [pdf, 49 KB]

   ...counsel for the plaintiff Judgment: 25 November 2011 INTERLOCUTORY JUDGMENT OF JUDGE A D FORD [1] It is now after 5.00 pm on a Friday afternoon. Staff have voluntarily stayed on in the office to deal with this matter. [2] An urgent application has been referred to me in which Ms Kennedy seeks a non-publication order suppressing any identifying details of two overseas exchange students allegedly identified in a determination of the Employment Relations Authority. 1...

3. Fisher v Fisher - Mura Rattenbury [2013] Chief Judge's MB 272 (2013 CJ 272) [pdf, 395 KB]

   2013 Chief Judge's MB 272 IN THE MAoRI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AOTEA DISTRICT Hearing: A20090004324 CJ2009/9 UNDER Section 45, Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Mura Rattenbury BETWEEN CORRIENE FISHER Applicant AND 8 October 2012 (Heard at Wellington) NEVILLE FISHER Respondent Appearances: Coniene Fisher, Applicant Judgment: 22 May 2013 DECISION OF CHIEF JUDGE W W ISAAC 2013 Chief Judge's MB 273 Introduction [1] This application, fi...

4. [2019] NZEmpC 157 Van Kleef v Alliance Group Ltd [pdf, 475 KB]

   ...NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA ŌTAUTAHI [2019] NZEmpC 157 EMPC 407/2018 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of an application for disclosure BETWEEN MARIA VAN KLEEF Plaintiff AND ALLIANCE GROUP LIMITED Defendant Hearing: 7 October 2019 (Heard at Christchurch) Appearances: M Van Kleef, in person J Cowan,...

5. SL v QU [2023] NZDT 677 (16 December 2023) [pdf, 190 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 677 APPLICANT SL RESPONDENT QU The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. In February 2022, SL purchased a used imported [vehicle] advertised as having 57,100 km, for $20,600.00. 2. SL claims $23,269.74, being a refund of the purchase price and the balance in costs he says are associated with the maintenance and...

6. NN v IQ [2022] NZDT 250 (6 December 2022) [pdf, 100 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 250 APPLICANT NN RESPONDENT IQ The Tribunal orders: IQ is to pay NN $1500.00 by 22/12/2022 Reasons: 1. NN was offered a [car] from her friend IQ for $3500. They discussed aspects of the car and the deal and NN took it for a short test drive. 2. IQ told her the CV joint was faulty and she would have it replaced the...

7. SI v NI & DI [2022] NZDT 218 (29 November 2022) [pdf, 104 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 218 APPLICANT SI RESPONDENT NI SECOND RESPONDENT DI The Tribunal orders: a. The claim against NI was withdrawn at the start of the hearing and is dismissed. b. DI is to pay to SI $6,500.00 by 16 January 2023. Reasons: 1. Today’s hearing was a rehearing of the dispute which means it starts afresh fr...

8. MN Ltd v QN & EN [2021] NZDT 1440 (27 April 2021) [pdf, 256 KB]

   Page 1 of 7 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2020] NZDT 1440 APPLICANT / COUNTERCLAIM RESPONDENT MN Ltd RESPONDENT / COUNTERCLAIM APPLICANT QN & EN The Tribunal orders: QN and EN are to pay MN Ltd $10,367.46 on or before Friday 14 May 2021 and this sum shall address in full the claim and the counterclaim. Reasons: 1. QN and EN hired MN Ltd to carry out landscaping works around...

9. LA v VY LCRO 217 / 2010 (30 April 2012) [pdf, 73 KB]

   ...the Applicant, including money anticipated to be received from WINZ, and the Applicant receiving all of the files of the deceased and other documents. [15] The last part states (at number four), “this is a full and final settlement of all claims”, required the Applicant to make no more complaints of any kind to any authority concerning the Practitioner, that there was to be no litigation against the Practitioner, and that production of this settlement document was to be a co...

10. [2022] NZEmpC 218 New Zealand Nurses Organisation v Te Whatu Ora Health New Zealand [pdf, 326 KB]

    ...same interest in the subject matter of the proceedings as she does. The same point is made with regard to the fourth plaintiff. [26] Two supporting affidavits have been filed. A representative of each of the two unions produced copies of the applicable rules, together with a form which members are required to sign, stating that the relevant union is authorised to act as the members’ representative in all matters relating to the members’ employment. [27] Health NZ opposes th...