Search Results

1. Preece v Hokotehi Moriori Trust (2010) 5 Te Waipounamu MB 83 (5 TWP 83) [pdf, 109 KB]

   ...MORIORI TRUST MLC A20090019083 12 October 2010 IN THE MAORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TE WAIPOUNAMU DISTRICT 5 TE WAIPOUNAMU MB 83 (5 TWP 83) A20090019083 UNDER Section 18(1)(e), Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF an application to determine whether a specified person is a Māori or descendant of a Māori BETWEEN CHARLES PREECE Applicant AND HOKOTEHI MORIORI TRUST Respondent Hearing: 15 February 2010, 1 Te Waipounamu MB 213-227 (Heard at C...

2. LCRO 097/2023 RQ and EP v OM (14 February 2024) [pdf, 288 KB]

   ...community to disrupt my involvement with the charity organisation I currently run. 3 [11] The applicants’ lawyer wrote to the respondent expressing his opinion that no family harm could be established on the basis of Mr X’s affidavit and requesting that the application be withdrawn. [12] The Court issued a minute directing Mr X to file further affidavit evidence by a specified date and setting a time limit for any affidavit evidence in response from the applicants. [13] The a...

3. Waitangi Tribunal - issue 57 of Te Manutukutuku [pdf, 571 KB]

   ...Hapü within six months of the signing of the media- tion agreement. It is expected the governing body, Te Röpü Matua, will have the robust mandate required by the claims process to effectively par- ticipate throughout. The hapü have also formed a new claims committee Te Röpü Whenua, comprising three members from both former claims. They will ensure their claims are particularised and filed as required by the Tribunal under the new approach. This agreement is of importance...

4. Wakefield 10 October 2015 NZSHD 10 [pdf, 118 KB]

   [2015] NZSHD 10 SHD Number 15 / 024357 IN THE MATTER of the Secondhand Dealers and Pawnbrokers Act 2004 AND IN THE MATTER of an application by DORIS WAKEFIELD of Dargaville for a waiver of disqualification under s/23 of the Act BEFORE THE LICENSING AUTHORITY OF SECONDHAND DEALERS AND PAWNBROKERS DECISION The Application [1] Doris Wakefield (“the applicant”) applied to the Licensing Authority of Secondhand Dealers and Pawnbrokers (...

5. Wang v Denekamp [2018] NZIACDT 48 (23 November 2018) [pdf, 152 KB]

   ...Denekamp,1 dated 31 August 2018. The Tribunal found in that decision that Mr Denekamp had breached professional obligations. [2] The facts relating to the complaint, as found by the Tribunal, are in outline: [2.1] Mr Denekamp received a completed application form for a student visa. [2.2] He had no personal contact with the complainant, accordingly: [2.2.1] He never interviewed the complainant to understand his immigration options. [2.2.2] He did not enter into a written agre...

6. Mok v Boyd [2011] NZWHT Auckland 1 [pdf, 94 KB]

   ...Respondent (Nicola Boyd removed) AND CRAIG TIBBITS Second Respondent AND ALAN BOLDERSON Third Respondent AND MICHAEL GREGORY MAY Fourth Respondent DECISION ON COSTS Adjudicator: S Pezaro 18 January 2011 Page | 2 APPLICATIONS FOR COSTS [1] Craig Tibbits, the second respondent, seeks an award of costs against Blake Boyd, the first respondent. Alan Bolderson, the third respondent, and Michael May, the fourth respondent, apply for an order of c...

7. KB v OS [2022] NZDT 287 (28 March 2023) [pdf, 213 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 287 APPLICANT KB RESPONDENT OS Ltd SECOND RESPONDENT LP RESPONDENT INSURER (if applicable) J Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. On the late evening of 14 July 2021 KB was driving his car on [Street name] in [Suburb] when he was involved in a collision with a van dr...

8. Overview Trustee Ltd as trustee of the Carrigafoyle Trust v Cook & Anor as trustees of the CC Trust [2011] NZWHT Auckland 35 [pdf, 309 KB]

   ...one expert was not being called shortly before the hearing commenced. Experts met only during the hearing period. If documentation had been prepared on time an experts‟ conference before the hearing may have been possible and would have informed the assessor of the differing views contrary to his. This would have especially applied once he was advised as to the application of Xypex coating in lieu of paint or plaster. Calderbank letter [11] In August 2008 all the responde...

9. OT US v N Ltd [2023] NZDT 169 (8 June 2023) [pdf, 196 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 169 APPLICANT OT APPLICANT US RESPONDENT N Ltd RESPONDENT INSURER (if applicable) R Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim by OT and US against N Ltd is dismissed. Reasons 1. OT drove a [vehicle] into the parking area which is part of N Ltd’s business. OT and US now brin...

10. NI v CT [2020] NZDT 1382 (14 May 2020) [pdf, 206 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2020] NZDT 1382 APPLICANT NI RESPONDENT CT SECOND RESPONDENT FM Limited RESPONDENT INSURER GNH Insurance The Tribunal hereby orders: 1. FM Limited is added as a respondent party to the claim. 2. The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. NI was driving home from work on 29 July 2019 at about 7...