13118 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 530 APPLICANT TS RESPONDENT L Ltd The Tribunal orders: L Ltd is to pay TS $5,500.00 by 1 November 2023. Background 1. L Ltd is a boat broker base in [City 1]. 2. TS resides in [City 2]. 3. TS was interested in buying a [boat], principally for his son’s use. 4. L Ltd had a 1979 [boat] listed for sale [online]. 5. The...
...NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA ŌTAUTAHI [2020] NZEmpC 95 EMPC 250/2017 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of an application for costs BETWEEN GEORGINA RACHELLE Plaintiff AND AIR NEW ZEALAND LIMITED Defendant Hearing: On the papers Appearances: G Rachelle, plaintiff in person A Caisley, counsel for defendant...
...Ansell, counsel for defendant Judgment: 19 August 2019 JUDGMENT OF JUDGE M E PERKINS [1] These proceedings involve a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority dated 8 March 2019.1 [2] A statement of claim and statement of defence have been filed. Mr Finnigan, counsel for the defendant, filed a memorandum of counsel accompanying the statement of defence. He complained that the statement of claim did not fully and clearly set out the g...
...pension, obviously as WINZ was unaware that he was already in receipt of this payment. The Ministry agrees that Mr XXXX continued to receive letters and forms which indicated either that he had not yet applied for a UK pension or that an incomplete application form had been received from him. [5] It is also agreed that Mr XXXX told the Ministry that he was eligible for a Navy pension which was added to his income. [6] On 20 May 2013 Mr XXXX applied to include his wife as...
...Issued: 19 March 2014 2 DECISION Preliminary [1] The complainant lodged an expression of interest and Immigration New Zealand invited him to apply for a residence visa. [2] The adviser was acting for him; she did not lodge the application until his current visa had expired. The result was Immigration New Zealand could not consider his application. [3] The complainant says he provided all the information requested. In addition, a staff member in the adviser’s pr...
...Court, Mr Halse has had to continue with the proceedings when they could have been resolved in mediation. [7] Mr Halse opposes any uplift and submits that the Hamilton City Council should have provided sworn affidavits in evidence to support its claim, with the ability for Mr Halse to cross-examine witnesses. Mr Halse seeks a hearing to enable him to test the evidence and provide further oral submissions. The Hamilton City Council is entitled to costs [8] While I acknowledge...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 2 APPLICANT AS RESPONDENT EI Ltd The Tribunal orders: EI Ltd is to pay AS the sum of $44.00 on or before 28 February 2023. Reasons 1. AS ordered a grape plant from EI Ltd nursery in [Town], and paid $44.00 including shipping. She supplied her address to EI Ltd but unfortunately EI Ltd supplied the incorrect ad...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 170 APPLICANT DX RESPONDENT E Ltd SECOND RESPONDENT ET The Tribunal orders: 1. ET is to pay $19,665.00 to DX before 30 October 2022. 2. The claim against E Ltd is dismissed. Reasons 1. Around September 2021 DX discussed constructing and laying a driveway at his property at [Address] with ET. 2. ET...
...quality or durability. Legally that risk is hers and cannot be shifted back to DG, so the claim must be dismissed. Referee: E Paton-Simpson CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 3 Date: 17 March 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for...
IN THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2015] NZDT 840 BETWEEN DE APPLICANT AND WV LIMITED RESPONDENT Date of Order: 4 September 2015 Referee: Referee Perfect ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that WV Limited is to pay the sum of $1,465.10 directly to DE on or before 25 September 2015. Facts [1] DE was engaged by WV Limited as a contract builder and signed a written contract on 29 June 2014. In fact the contract is...