Search Results

1. Vikashwarjeet v Devi [2014] NZIACDT 27 (17 March 2014) [pdf, 102 KB]

   ...licence, she did not tell them and arrange for continuing representation. [4] The adviser generally disputes the facts alleged in support of the complaint, and claims she delivered professional services properly. She says the complainants withheld information about the character issue, which was not her fault. [5] The Tribunal has accepted the account given by the complainants and upheld the complaint. The complaint [6] The material allegations in the complaint were set out in the St...

2. Patel v Dean [2020] NZHRRT 37 [pdf, 237 KB]

   ...Manktelow for plaintiff Mr J Dean in person DATE OF HEARING: 12 and 13 August 2019 DATE OF DECISION: 31 August 2020 DECISION OF TRIBUNAL1 [1] Mr Dean is a lawyer and Mr Patel his former client. In February 2018 Mr Patel requested a copy of his file from Mr Dean. Five weeks later, Mr Dean responded and told Mr Patel he would charge him $19,175.47 for the provision of his file. Mr Patel refused to pay. Mr Patel filed this claim seeking his file and damages fo...

3. Recording Industry Association of New Zealand v TCLE-A-T5877102 [2013] NZCOP 2 [pdf, 75 KB]

   ...1994 BETWEEN RECORDING INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION OF NEW ZEALAND INCORPORATED Applicant (Rights Owner) AND TCLE[A]-T5877102 Respondent (Account Holder) BEFORE THE COPYRIGHT TRIBUNAL HEARING ON THE PAPERS DECISION The Application [1] This is an application by Recording Industry Association of New Zealand Incorporated (“the Applicant”) for an order under s.122O of the Copyright (Infringing File Sharing) Amendment Act 2011 (“the Act”). The Applicant...

4. EQ & EQQ v UJ Ltd & UJU [2016] NZDT 955 (17 August 2016) [pdf, 87 KB]

   IN THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2016] NZDT 955 BETWEEN EQ APPLICANT AND EQQ SECOND APPLICANT AND UJ LTD RESPONDENT AND UJU SECOND RESPONDENT Date of Order: 17 August 2016 Referee: Referee Whineray ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that the claim is dismissed. Facts [1] In June 2014, Mr EQ and Mrs EQQ purchased the house at XX Street Christchurch. By December 20

5. Wai 2180 Taihape inquiry newsletter 1 June 2015 [pdf, 621 KB]

   ...beautiful and romantic scenery and country I have seen…” Rev. Richard Taylor’s description of ‘Inland Pātea’, 1860. Page 2: A snapshot of the inquiry Page 3: The research program Page 4: Nga kōrero tuku iho Page 4: Claims aggregation and consolidation Tēnā koutou katoa, Welcome to the first issue of what is intended as a regular newsletter on the Taihape: Rangitīkei ki Rangipō district inquiry (Wai 2180). It is written by Waitangi Trib...

6. LI v UC & IC [2021] NZDT 1609 (24 June 2021) [pdf, 210 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1609 APPLICANT LI RESPONDENT UC and IC The Tribunal orders: 1. IC is joined as a respondent to this claim. 2. UC and IC are to pay to LI the sum of $2,000.00 on or before 16 July 2021. Reasons: 1. In March 2021, UC and IC advertised for sale a 2011 [car] on Trade Me and a local social media page. The origi...

7. KP v MN [2023] NZDT 776 (20 December 2023) [pdf, 211 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 776 APPLICANT KP RESPONDENT MN The Tribunal orders: MN is to pay to KP $5,100.00 on or before 5:00pm on Friday 23 February 2024. Reasons 1. In or around May 2023, KP was looking for a car to purchase for her son. KP saw an ad via Marketplace for a [motor vehicle] by MN. The car was advertised as coming with a ‘mechanical warrant...

8. LCRO 82/2018 ZI v WS (30 May 2019) [pdf, 242 KB]

   ...only a copy of the file, and not the original. 2 The only work undertaken by Mr WS for Mr ZI was to lodge the Notice of Claim in 2011 and so this would seem to be an erroneous understanding. 4 Mr ZI seeks to be compensated for the losses he claims. Mr WS responded to the application for review and invites this Office to reverse the fine and costs orders. Review The review proceeded by way of a hearing in Auckland on 14 May 2019 and was conducted by Mr Vaughan acting as a...

9. J v Khetarpal [2015] NZIACDT 95 (05 November 2015) [pdf, 224 KB]

   ...New Zealand to consider regularising his situation. He paid a fee for her services; paying half immediately, with the balance due if she was successful. [2] The complainant believed the matter was progressing. However, Ms Khetarpal did not lodge a request with Immigration New Zealand. Ms Khetarpal later left the practice without filing the request. As a result, the Tribunal considered three potential breaches of professional standards. These were: [2.1] Ms Khetarpal failed to carry out...

10. DI Ltd v NW & Ors [2024] NZDT 657 (13 September 2024) [pdf, 209 KB]

    Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 657 APPLICANT DI Limited RESPONDENT NW RESPONDENT M Limited RESPONDENT KS Limited The Tribunal orders: 1. KS Limited and M Limited are to pay $2,840.50 to DI Limited on or before Monday 7 October 2024. 2. The counterclaim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. Mr B, director of DI Limited said he was engaged to move eight newly bu...