Search Results

1. LCRO 216/2018 AA v BB (28 November 2019) [pdf, 165 KB]

   ...advice on matters relating to cost issues. [8] Ms BB provided her opinion on 31 July 2017. [9] On 1 August 2017, Mr CC advised Ms BB, that Mr AA did not wish to proceed with an appeal. He did however indicate that he wished to proceed with a claim in negligence, and to make an application for stay. [10] On 25 October 2017, Mr CC forwarded to Ms BB a letter of demand from [JDY]’s lawyer. That letter of demand advised, that a charging order had been obtained over Mr AA’s prop...

2. [2020] NZEmpC 184 Labour Inspector v Samra Holdings Ltd [pdf, 222 KB]

   ...LIMITED T/A TE PUNA LIQUOR CENTRE [2020] NZEmpC 184 [6 November 2020] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2020] NZEmpC 184 EMPC 339/2020 IN THE MATTER OF an application for a freezing order BETWEEN A LABOUR INSPECTOR OF THE MINISTRY OF BUSINESS, INNOVATION AND EMPLOYMENT Applicant AND SAMRA HOLDINGS LIMITED T/A TE PUNA LIQUOR CENTRE First Respondent AND...

3. ME & NN v QU Ltd [2021] NZDT 1494 (5 May 2021) [pdf, 200 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1494 APPLICANT ME APPLICANT NN RESPONDENT QU Limited The Tribunal orders: QU is to pay ME and NN $4,000.00 on or before Monday 24 May 2021. Reasons 1. ME and NN purchased a [package] tour, planned for 28 April to 25 May 2020, from QU Ltd trading as QU. The price per person was $22,696.00, based on

4. Van Wey Lovatt v Accident Compensation Corporation (Leave to appeal to the High Court) [2024] NZACC 150 (24 September 2024) [pdf, 165 KB]

   ...COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2024] NZACC 150 ACAR 130/23 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 162 OF THE ACT BETWEEN AMY VAN WEY LOVATT Applicant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: On the papers Submissions: The Applicant is self-represented H Evans for the Respondent Judgment: 24 September 2024 ______________________________________...

5. P Singh v Kumar [2011] NZIACDT 24 (18 August 2011) [pdf, 162 KB]

   ...2009 letter. The letter also reiterated the need for a new application and, in addition, noted there were outstanding court proceedings so there was a character issue to address. This letter required a response by 27 August 2009. The Adviser has not claimed the court proceedings were a bar to a successful application for a work permit, or that this element had any impact on his advice. [37] The Adviser failed to respond to the two letters from Immigration New Zealand and, accordingly, th...

6. LCRO 118/2023 TC v GS (13 December 2023) [pdf, 213 KB]

   ...[2023] NZLCRO 157 Ref: LCRO 118/2023 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a decision of the [Area] Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN TC Applicant AND GS Respondent The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed DECISION Introduction [1] The applicant, Mr TC, has applied for review of a decision by the [Area] Standards Com...

7. TU v SM S Ltd [2023] NZDT 404 (11 September 2023) [pdf, 214 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 404 APPLICANT TU RESPONDENT SM SECOND RESPONDENT S Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. SM is to: a. return the food truck to TU on or by 30 September 2023, and b. pay TU $1,500 on or by 30 September 2023. Reasons 2. SM and TU were friends for some years. Both operated food businesses. In November 202...

8. VH Ltd v KI [2024] NZDT 386 (24 June 2024) [pdf, 97 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 386 APPLICANT VH Ltd RESPONDENT KI The Tribunal orders: 1. KI is not liable to pay the sum of $13801.15 to VH Ltd. 2. VH Ltd’s claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. This dispute arises as a result of email hacking, more formally known as business comprise (BEC) fraud. In September-October 2023 VH Ltd carried out lands...

9. DH v KQ [2021] NZDT 1654 (9 November 2021) [pdf, 203 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1654 APPLICANT DH RESPONDENT KQ The Tribunal orders: KQ is to pay DH the sum of $495.00 on or before 29 November 2021. Reasons: 1. DH purchased an electric scooter via TradeMe from KQ. In the TradeMe advertisement KQ described the scooter as a [scooter model]. He copied the specifications from another website,...

10. DI v EL & N Ltd [2024] NZDT 81 (23 January 2024) [pdf, 134 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 81 APPLICANT DI RESPONDENT EL SECOND RESPONDENT N Ltd APPLICANT'S INSURER (if applicable) X Ltd The Tribunal orders: EL’s insurer (N Ltd) is to pay DI’s insurer (X Ltd) $4,679.06 on or before 27 February 2024. Reasons: 1. There was a collision between a car driven DI and a car driven by EL. The collision...