Search Results

1. XM & KM v U Ltd [2024] NZDT 716 (15 August 2024) [pdf, 97 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 716 APPLICANT XM and KM RESPONDENT U Ltd The Tribunal orders: U Ltd is to pay $717.00 to XM and KM on or before 12 September 2024. Reasons 1. XM and KM entered into a contract for the hire of a campervan from U Ltd for a 15-day period between Sunday 18 February and Monday 4 March 2024. The cost to hire the campervan was $3,590.65 (...

2. BL v JN Ltd [2023] NZDT 162 (7 June 2023) [pdf, 231 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 7 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 162 APPLICANT BL RESPONDENT JN Ltd The Tribunal orders: JN Ltd is to pay the sum of $1,600.00 to BL on or before Wednesday, 28 June 2023. REASONS 1. In December 2022, JN Ltd placed an advertisement on [online selling platform] for the sale of a 2011 [redacted] caravan (“the Caravan”) at an asking price of $42,0...

3. TTC v BL [2013] NZIACDT 25 (4 April 2013) [pdf, 90 KB]

   ...Complainant: In person Adviser: In person Date Issued: 4 April 2013 2 MINUTE Introduction [1] Mr TTC engaged Ms BL to provide immigration assistance. [2] In essence, he has complained Ms BL failed to lodge an application when she said she would. [3] Ms BL said she progressed her instructions as quickly as Mr TTC provided the information and documentation she required for that to happen; and he paid the fees. [4] The Tribunal has to determine whe...

4. Jones v Accident Compensation Corporation [2016] NZACA 02 [pdf, 250 KB]

   ...Hlavac Date of Hearing: 23 May 2016 Date of Decision: 21 June 2016 __________________________________________________________________ DECISION __________________________________________________________________ INTRODUCTION [1] This is an application by Michael John Jones for leave to appeal out of time to the Authority against the decision of a reviewer dated 28 June 1994, together with an appeal if leave is granted. [2] Mr Jones suffered an accident in 1988 for which he...

5. UT v DU [2023] NZDT 716 (19 December 2023) [pdf, 182 KB]

   ...something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehearing, you can apply online, download a form from the Disputes Tribunal website or obtain an application form from any Tribunal office. The application must be lodged within 20 working days of the decision having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Reheari...

6. Mateeva v Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (Extension of Time to Commence Proceedings) [2024] NZHRRT 39 [pdf, 204 KB]

   1 DECISION OF DEPUTY CHAIRPERSON DECLINING APPLICATION TO EXTEND TIME TO COMMENCE PROCEEDINGS1 [1] Ms Mateeva is applying under s 98(8) of the Privacy Act 2020 (the Act) to file proceedings in the Tribunal outside the statutory six-month time period within which such proceedings must usually be commenced. 1 This decision is to be cited as Mateeva v Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (Extension of Time to Commence Proceedings) [2024] NZHRRT 39. IN THE HUMAN RI...

7. CI v LU [2023] NZDT 786 (19 December 2023) [pdf, 176 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 786 APPLICANT CI RESPONDENT LU The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. On 13 May 2022, CI (the buyer) purchased a [car] for $48,000.00 from LU (the seller) in a $1 reserve auction [online]. The auction stated: “Over 50K spent on this car. Fresh rebuild on the motor, still running on the run in tune, built b...

8. FB and QB v HD Ltd [2021] NZDT 1445 (10 November 2020) [pdf, 264 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2020] NZDT 1445 APPLICANT FB APPLICANT QB RESPONDENT HD Limited The Tribunal orders: HD Limited is to pay FB and QB the sum of $4,613.91 within 28 days of the date of this order. Reasons 1. In February 2019, Mr and Mrs B booked a [cycling] tour with HD Limited. The tour was to commence on 22 May 2012. Mr and Mrs B paid...

9. RU v MW LCRO 293 / 2011 [pdf, 94 KB]

   ...for his time [was] fair and reasonable”. It did not discuss the question of whether or not there were in this case “special circumstances”. [11] Regarding the non-application for legal aid issue the Committee referred to the Practitioner forming the view that the LSA was unlikely to fund the Applicant’s proposed litigation, and that it was a “fair assessment given the background to [the] proceedings”. The Committee found that no criticism could be made of the stance tak...

10. NG & OG v JS [2024] NZDT 33 (18 January 2024) [pdf, 151 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 33 FIRST APPLICANT NG SECOND APPLICANT OG RESPONDENT JS The Tribunal orders: The claim by NG and OG against JS is dismissed. REASONS 1. The Respondent, JS, advertised for sale through [online] a [Caravan]. 2. On 6 August 2023, the Applicants, NG and OG, viewed the Caravan and purchased it from JS for a purchase...