13121 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 33 FIRST APPLICANT NG SECOND APPLICANT OG RESPONDENT JS The Tribunal orders: The claim by NG and OG against JS is dismissed. REASONS 1. The Respondent, JS, advertised for sale through [online] a [Caravan]. 2. On 6 August 2023, the Applicants, NG and OG, viewed the Caravan and purchased it from JS for a purchase...
...Chapter 1 – Submitting an application Overview Process The diagram below illustrates the process for how applications for approval are assessed. This chapter focuses on the information submitted by the applicant. Further information requested. If not received by date given, application is returned. Application assessed and sent to Selection Committee Application received and checked it is complete Complete Not complete Complete If approved, applicant may be of...
...something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehearing, you can apply online, download a form from the Disputes Tribunal website or obtain an application form from any Tribunal office. The application must be lodged within 20 working days of the decision having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Reheari...
...also no longer has any footage. The manager of R Ltd confirmed to B Ltd that the available footage is the only footage of anyone circling UL’s car or acting in an unusual manner near her car on 22 November 2022. 5. The issues to resolve this claim are: a. Did FZ cause the damage to UL’s car? b. If so, what is the fair and reasonable cost of remedying the damage for which she is liable? CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 3 Did FZ cause the damage to UL’s car? 6. FZ...
...settled and proceeded as an employment relationship problem before the Employment Relations Authority (the Authority). An investigation meeting was held on 9 January 2013. A determination of the Authority was issued on 1 May 2013. Mr Narayan’s claims were dismissed. 1 Costs were reserved and in a subsequent determination dated 24 September 2013, the Authority ordered Mr Narayan to make a contribution towards Telecom’s costs amounting to $4,000. 2 [3] Mr Narayan has file...
...REVENUE DEPARTMENT [2020] NZEmpC 155 [30 September 2020] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2020] NZEmpC 155 EMPC 292/2020 IN THE MATTER OF an application for a declaration pursuant to s 6(5) of the Employment Relations Act 2000 AND IN THE MATTER of an application for joinder BETWEEN KEANU HEAD Plaintiff AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OF THE INLAND REVENUE DE...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 20 APPLICANT LL RESPONDENT BT The Tribunal orders: BT is to pay $1,400.00 to LL on or before Monday 18 April 2022. Reasons: 1. LL loaned $1,400 to BT so she could pay her rent and avoid eviction from her tenancy. The money was transferred directly into BT’s landlord’s account. BT agreed to repay the money once s...
IN THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL TRI-2012-100-000106 [2013] NZWHT AUCKLAND 30 BETWEEN NZ DOMAINE INVESTMENTS LIMITED Claimant AND SHANE EDWARD PLUMMER Second Claimant AND TAURANGA CITY COUNCIL First Respondent (DISCONTINUED) AND WARWICK BROUGHTON Second Respondent AND BUBBLEHEAD LIMITED (WATERPROOFING SYSTEMS 1997 LIMITED) Third Respondent (DISCONTINUED) AND AQUATIGHT ROOFING SERVICES LIMITE
...now seeks a review of the Rakato B Residue Trust. She says the trustees have failed to properly respond to her request to build on and occupy trust land and have delayed holding meetings of owners to discuss her request. [2] Ms Puohotaua also claimed that the trustees have shared information about her request with non-owners and that they have been tardy in providing her with trust information. Overall, she argued that the trustees’ performance has been sufficiently wanting to...
...AUCKLAND [2014] NZEmpC 224 [4 December 2014] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2014] NZEmpC 224 ARC 22/14 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of an application for further and better disclosure of documents BETWEEN SHABEENA SHAREEN NISHA (NISHA ALIM) Plaintiff AND LSG SKY CHEFS NEW ZEALAND LIMITED Defendant Hearing: By affidavits and memoranda of sub...