Search Results

Search results for claim form.

13121 items matching your search terms

  1. [2018] NZEmpC 100 Elisara v Allianz NZ Ltd [pdf, 303 KB]

    ...AUCKLAND [2018] NZEmpC 100 [28 August 2018] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2018] NZEmpC 100 EMPC 307/2017 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of an application for further and better disclosure and/or for production of documents BETWEEN TITIIMAEA EUGENE ELISARA Plaintiff AND ALLIANZ NEW ZEALAND LIMITED Defendant Hearing: 23 July 2018 (Heard at A...

  2. [2015] NZEmpC 98 Premier Events Group Ltd Ors v Beattie [pdf, 160 KB]

    ...Limited (in liquidation and receivership) Judgment: 24 June 2015 INTERIM COSTS JUDGMENT OF CHIEF JUDGE G L COLGAN [1] Malcolm Beattie, Anthony Regan and Patricia Panapa seek orders for costs arising out of their successful claims and/or defences of claims against them as determined by the judgment of the Court issued on 17 December 2014 1 and as recalled and reissued under the Court’s supplementary judgment issued on 9 February 2015. 2 [2] As this judgm...

  3. [2021] NZACC 127 - Jones v ACC (11 August 2021) [pdf, 177 KB]

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2021] NZACC 127 ACA 02/18 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION TO RECALL DECISION BETWEEN CRAIG RICHARD JONES Applicant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: On the Papers Appearances: Applicant in person D Tuiqereqere for the respondent Judgment: 11 August 2021 _____________________________...

  4. OT & TT v TD [2022] NZDT 271 (20 December 2022) [pdf, 108 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 271 APPLICANT OT APPLICANT TT RESPONDENT TD The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. OT and TT live next door to a property owned by TD. 2. OT and TT wished to place a fence on the boundary between their property and TD’s property. TT approached TD and believed she had his ag...

  5. [2014] NZEmpC 118 Pyne Gould Corp Ltd v West [pdf, 80 KB]

    ...dated 18 March, 2 and 9 April and 19 May 2014) Counsel: M Crotty and A Service, counsel for the plaintiff L Ryder, counsel for the defendant Judgment: 8 July 2014 INTERLOCUTORY JUDGMENT OF JUDGE B A CORKILL The application [1] This judgment relates to a contested disclosure issue. [2] The defendant, Mr James West, was appointed by the plaintiff, Pyne Gould Corporation Limited (PGC), as Financial Controller in June 2011, having worked for PG...

  6. Te Manutukutuku Issue 5 [pdf, 2.8 MB]

    ...oti katoa nga kaupapa i utaina ki runga ki a koe Waiho mai ra ko nga kaupapa i oti hei whakairo, hei whakamaumaharatanga kia koe E kore koe e wareware Turirangi Te Kani will be greatly missed when hearings resume in September for the Te Roroa claim. He will be missed by all of us: Tribunal, Tribunal staff, claimants and Crown. For those who had the honour of working with Turi, the gift of his knowledge and his warmth will remain. He was invaluable not only for his tribal hist...

  7. Morton v Marshall [pdf, 46 KB]

    CLAIM NO: 3483 UNDER the Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2002 IN THE MATTER of an adjudication BETWEEN JAMES RICHARD MORTON and JENNIFER DIANE MORTON Claimants AND MICHAEL MARSHALL First Respondent Hearing: 13 February 2006 Appearances: Mr & Mrs Morton in person No appearance by Mr Marshall Determination: 16 June 2006 DETERMINATION INDEX Background .............................................................

  8. [2022] NZIACDT 10 - BC v Lawlor (18 May 2022) [pdf, 192 KB]

    ...application would be returned. Another attempt at payment was made by the officer on 25 September, but it was unsuccessful. [22] On 26 September 2019, Immigration NZ sent a letter to the brother-in-law (through Mr Lawlor) advising that the family’s applications received on 10 September 2019 were not accepted as they were incomplete. The fees had not been paid. [23] In a text sent to Mr Lawlor by the complainant that day, she asked him to explain why they had applied for that...

  9. LCRO 161-2016 XS v VS [pdf, 152 KB]

    LCRO 161/2016 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of Auckland Standards Committee 3 BETWEEN XS Applicant AND VS Respondent DECISION The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed Introduction [1] Mr XS has applied for a review of the determination by Auckland Standards Committee 3 (the Committee) that M...

  10. MVDT Annual Report 2014-2015 [pdf, 178 KB]

    ...MOTOR VEHICLE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL Period 1 July 2014 to 30 June 2015 Dear Minister Pursuant to section 87 of the Motor Vehicle Sales Act 2003 (‘the Act”) I am pleased to submit the following Annual Report summarizing the applications the Motor Vehicle Disputes Tribunal has dealt with during the year, detailing cases which, in my opinion, require special mention, and making recommendations for amendments to the Act. The Tribunal received 258 applications thi...