Search Results

1. Hurricanes Crusaders Chiefs v Accident Compensation Corporation (Leave to appeal to the High Court) [2023] NZACC 128 [pdf, 266 KB]

   ...PARTNERSHIP (ACR 34/22) Second Applicant BETWEEN CHIEFS RUGBY CLUB LIMITED PARTNERSHIP (ACR 35/22) Third Applicant C AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: On the papers Appearances: Ms M Urquhart for the Applicants Mr P McBride for the Respondent Judgment: 2 August 2023 ___________________________________________________________________________ RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE C J MCGUIRE [Leave to Appeal to the High Court...

2. TO v QJ Ltd [2018] NZDT 1476 (10 May 2018) [pdf, 188 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2018] NZDT 1476 APPLICANT TO RESPONDENT QJ Limited The Tribunal hereby orders: QJ Limited is to pay the sum of $210.00 to TO on or before Thursday 24 May 2018. Reasons: 1. In June 2017, TO purchased a battery for his electric golf trundler from QJ Limited, trading as Mr Q. He wanted a “deep cycle” battery, which h...

3. Van Wey Lovatt v Accident Compensation Corporation (Leave to appeal to the High Court) [2024] NZACC 150 (24 September 2024) [pdf, 165 KB]

   ...COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2024] NZACC 150 ACAR 130/23 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 162 OF THE ACT BETWEEN AMY VAN WEY LOVATT Applicant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: On the papers Submissions: The Applicant is self-represented H Evans for the Respondent Judgment: 24 September 2024 ______________________________________...

4. UI & II v SG [2024] NZDT 224 (6 March 2024) [pdf, 207 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 224 APPLICANT UI and II RESPONDENT SG SECOND RESPONDENT W Ltd APPLICANT'S INSURER (if applicable) B Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. SG owns [property 1] and [property 2]. The long ROW driveway leading to his properties runs parallel to the ROW driveway for [property 3], w

5. KC v KZ [2024] NZDT 421 (30 April 2024) [pdf, 205 KB]

   ...something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehearing, you can apply online, download a form from the Disputes Tribunal website or obtain an application form from any Tribunal office. The application must be lodged within 20 working days of the decision having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Reheari...

6. EI v EE Ltd [2024] NZDT 529 (3 July 2024) [pdf, 182 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 529 APPLICANT EI RESPONDENT EE Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. In late January 2024 EI and her husband stayed one night at [a hotel] in [City], which is operated by EE Ltd Limited (“EE Ltd”). Early on 29 January 2024 EI and her husband ate breakfast together at the hotel, each ordering a vegetarian...

7. Finau v Tangilanu [2014] NZIACDT 50 (15 April 2014) [pdf, 110 KB]

   ...DECISION REPRESENTATION: Registrar: In person Complainant: In person Adviser: In person Date Issued: 15 April 2014 2 DECISION Preliminary [1] The complainant engaged the adviser to assist with a request for a visa. She lodged the request and Immigration New Zealand requested further information. At that point, the adviser’s licence expired, so she could not respond to Immigration New Zealand. The loss of her licence precluded further w...

8. BD v DS Ltd [2020] NZDT 1504 (14 October 2020) [pdf, 134 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2020] NZDT 1504 APPLICANT BD RESPONDENT LE SECOND RESPONDENT DS Limited The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. BD says the DS Limited (DS) knowingly and deliberately supplied under specification concrete and this rendered his purpose built building unsuitable for the purpose for which it was bui...

9. KN v BT [2020] NZDT 1365 (9 December 2020) [pdf, 101 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2020] NZDT 1365 APPLICANT KN RESPONDENT BT APPLICANT'S INSURER (if applicable) BN Limited The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. KN and BT own neighbouring properties with an L-shaped shared boundary and a 26m length runs along BT’s driveway (which runs to the house at the rear of K...

10. T Ltd v R Ltd [2023] NZDT 100 (24 March 2023) [pdf, 193 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 100 APPLICANT T Ltd RESPONDENT R Ltd The Tribunal orders: R Ltd is to pay to T Ltd the sum of $7,429.00 on or before 21 April 2023. Reasons: 1. In or around September 2022, T Ltd carried out work for R Ltd. 2. T Ltd sent an invoice to R Ltd in October 2022 for $7,429.00. 3. A number of reminders were sent from T Lt...