Search Results

1. Waitangi Tribunal - Wai 2522 2.5.0009 TPPA [pdf, 1.3 MB]

   WAITANGI TRIBUNAL CONCERNING AND Wai2522 Wai2523 Wai 2530 Wai2531 Wai2532 the Treaty of Waitangi Act 1975 applications for urgent hearings concerning the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement by the claimants for the Wai 2522,2523,2530,2531 and 2532 claims DECISION OF THE TRIBUNAL Introduction 1. This Tribunal currently has before it five applications seeking an urgent hearing of claims relating to the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (TPPA). 2. On 23 July 2015 we hea...

2. Pue v Tapatu - Okawa A1B (2011) 268 Aotea MB 93 (268 AOT 93) [pdf, 165 KB]

   ...Aotea MB 93 8 July 2011 IN THE MAORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AOTEA DISTRICT 268 Aotea MB 93 (268 AOT 93) A20110002330 UNDER Section 19, Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Okawa A1B BETWEEN SUSAN PUE Applicant AND RAY TAPATU, CHRISTINE TAPATU, IRENE TAPATU Respondents Hearing: 265 Aotea MB 243 dated 15 April 2011 267 Aotea MB 246 dated 1 July 2011 (Heard at New Plymouth) Appearances: Mr G Takarangi, counsel for the...

3. [2016] NZEmpC 152 Pretorius v Marra Construction [pdf, 141 KB]

   ...for Marra Construction (2004) Limited Judgment: 18 November 2016 COSTS JUDGMENT OF JUDGE B A CORKILL Introduction [1] This judgment deals with costs issues arising from two decisions. The first related to an unsuccessful application made by Mr Fredrick Pretorius to remove part of a relationship problem from the Employment Relations Authority (the Authority) to this Court, which was issued on 19 April 2016. 1 [2] The second related to the dispos...

4. Reweti - Part Waikoukou No 406 (2015) 96 Taitokerau MB 231 (96 TTK 231) [pdf, 259 KB]

   ...1870s of requiring a hapū of an owner to nominate spokespeople and putting them on the title of the land as “owners”. [8] Tai Akarana advised that a hearing was due to be held before the Waitangi Tribunal in the Kaipara Inquiry. Mr Akarana requested that the application be deferred until after that hearing as the Tribunal proceedings may assist in determining who should receive Lot 1 and 2. Judge Spencer granted the adjournment. [9] This application came back before the Cou...

5. [2022] NZEmpC 134 CultureSafe NZ Ltd v Employment Relations Authority [pdf, 211 KB]

   ...act [5] Mr Halse is the sole director of CultureSafe. During 2019 and 2020 he acted for three of Manuka Health’s Northland–based employees, including the grievants. In late 2019, the grievants resigned, and a few months later they lodged claims against Manuka Health with the Authority. [6] The ATA form signed by Mr Kalic on 22 March 2019 included the sentence “I understand CultureSafe NZ will make the final decision on the most appropriate action to take in respect of t...

6. Hart - Okaha Section 5 block VIII Gore SD (2012) 12 Te Waipounamu MB 286 (12 TWP 286) [pdf, 232 KB]

   ...2010 12 Taitokerau MB 220 dated 23 August 2010 6 Te Waipounamu MB 259 dated 25 January 2011 (Heard at Christchurch) Judgment: 9 May 2012 ORAL JUDGMENT OF JUDGE C T COXHEAD Introduction [1] On 19 November 2009, the Court received an application by Marie-Dawn Hart to remove a trustee from the Mark and Mary Walker Whanau Trust and from the Māori reservation over the land known as Okoha Section 5 Block VIII Gore Survey District. The Trust was set up by the applicant to c...

7. AN v ZM Ltd [2012] NZDT 581 (20 January 2012) [pdf, 16 KB]

   IN THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2012] NZDT 581 BETWEEN AN APPLICANT AND ZM Ltd RESPONDENT Date of Order: 20 January 2012 Referee: Referee Reuvecamp ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that that the respondent, ZM Ltd, pay the amount of $250.00 to the applicant, AN, on or before 31 January 2012. Facts [1] The applicant states that on 15 November 2011 she parked her car in Z Town. She left the site for a small err...

8. [2021] NZEmpC 162 GF v New Zealand Customs Service [pdf, 176 KB]

   ...A Fechney, advocate for applicant H Kynaston, counsel for defendant Judgment: 28 September 2021 INTERLOCUTORY JUDGMENT OF CHIEF JUDGE INGLIS (Application for non-publication order) [1] The plaintiff has filed a statement of claim in the Court challenging a determination of the Employment Relations Authority.1 The claim is coupled with an application for interim non-publication orders. While the defendant does not oppose the application, the Court must decide wh...

9. [2020] NZEmpC 24 CBA v ONM [pdf, 327 KB]

   ...Dyhrberg submitted that commencement of the proceedings should be dealt with under Step 1 of the scale, and under Band B. She says two days would be appropriate. [16] She also points out that a claim has been made under Step 5, which relates to applications for special leave to remove a matter, claimed under Band B at 1.5 days. Since it is common ground that this step should be included, I make no further comment about it. 6 H...

10. [2024] NZEmpC 131 Boyd v OJI [pdf, 363 KB]

    ...determination]; Boyd v OJI [2023] NZERA 332 (Member Doyle) [Third determination]; Boyd v OJI [2023] NZERA 425 (Member Doyle) [Fourth determination]; and OJI v Boyd [2023] NZERA 579 (Member Doyle) [Fifth determination]. 2 Her name and identifying information are the subject of AN interim non-publication order in this Court: Boyd v OJI [2023] NZEmpC 231. [2] I record that the employee has brought a separate claim against the employer for sanctions for failing to comply with a...