12946 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 715 APPLICANT NT RESPONDENT T Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim by NT is dismissed. Reasons 1. T Ltd operates a website selling performance parts for cars. In March 2023, NT purchased a TSD coilover kit for a [vehicle] via [online]. NT says the part was incorrectly supplied because when fitted by a professional, his car failed c...
LCRO 77/2017 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the [Area] Standards Committee BETWEEN RV Applicant AND JH Respondent The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. DECISION Introduction [1] Mr RV has applied for a review of a decision by the [Area] Standards Committee that further action in respect...
BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I MUA I TE KOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA Kl T .A.MAKI MAKAURAU IN THE MATTER AND BETWEEN AND AND Decision No. [2020] NZEnvC 119 of the Resource Management Act 1991 of an application for orders for rehearing of proceedings SKP Inc v Auckland Council [2018] NZEnvC 081 under s294 RMA SKP INCORPORATED (ENV-2018-AKL-00017 4) Applicant for rehearing AUCKLAND COUNCIL Respondent KENNEDY POINT BOATHARBOUR LIMITED Consent Holder Cour...
...something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehearing, you can apply online, download a form from the Disputes Tribunal website or obtain an application form from any Tribunal office. The application must be lodged within 20 working days of the decision having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Reheari...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 612 APPLICANT BM RESPONDENT NE The Tribunal orders: NE is to pay BM $21,494.93 on or before the 27th day of November 2023. The money may be paid into account [redacted]. Reasons: Introduction: 1. On the 13th of May 2021 BM purchased a house from NE. 2. Prior to purchase BM noticed some textured walls throughout a large por...
...person [35] The definition is directed to administrative tasks, such as keeping records, maintaining financial records and the like. [36] The definition deals specifically with the role a non-licensed person may have in the process of preparing applications for visas. They may record information “on any form, application, request, or claim on behalf and under the direction of another person”. [37] The natural meaning of those words is that the unlicensed person relying on the “cl...
...first defendant and in person for the second defendant Judgment: 29 July 2024 COSTS JUDGMENT OF JUDGE M S KING Background [1] The first defendant has applied for costs following the discontinuance of the plaintiff’s claim in this Court. Despite the discontinuance, costs remain outstanding, and efforts to resolve the issue between the parties have been unsuccessful. [2] On 12 July 2023 the Court granted the plaintiff’s application for leave to fi...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 8 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2020] NZDT 1360 APPLICANT TO Limited RESPONDENT TX The Tribunal orders, on the claim and counter-claim: TO Limited is to pay $7040.48 directly to TX on or before 22 January 2021. Reasons 1. TX engaged TO Ltd (‘TO’) to provide landscaping services at his family’s home. A detailed written scope of works was pr...
...ACC Claimants’ Rights - s 40; Appeals process - s 149(3); Decision – s 6(1), Accident Compensation Act 2001 (“the Act”)] Introduction [1] This is an appeal from the decision of a Reviewer dated 15 June 2023. The Reviewer dismissed an application for review on the basis of lack of jurisdiction, finding that the Corporation’s letter of 18 November 2022 was not a reviewable decision under the Act. Background [2] From December 2019, Dr Van Wey Lovatt was diagnosed with...
...Hearing: 31 May 2017 (Heard at Auckland) Appearances: E Dent, plaintiff in person A Russell, counsel for Waikato District Health Board Judgment: 13 June 2017 INTERLOCUTORY JUDGMENT OF JUDGE M E PERKINS REGARDING APPLICATION TO HAVE CERTAIN DOCUMENTS DECLARED INADMISSIBILE Introduction [1] This interlocutory judgment deals with an application by the Waikato District Health Board (WDHB) to have certain documents declared inadmissibl...