Search Results

1. Ngāti Pāoa Whānau Trust v Hauraki Māori Trust Board (1995) 96A Hauraki MB 155 (96A H 155) [pdf, 1.2 MB]

   ........ In the Maori Land COUrt of New Zealand Waikato Maniapoto District IN THE MAITER of an Application under Section 30 of the Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 by Ngatl Paoa Whanau Trust to determine representation for Ngati Paoa CORAM: PARTIES: ApPLICANT: G D Carter • Judge J W Milroy • Additional Member D Jaram • Additional Member Ngatl Paoa Whiinau Trust represented by Counsel. L Harvey and H Rapata OTHER CLAIMANTS: Hauraki Miiori Trust Board represented by COUnsel. J Wi...

2. Waitangi Tribunal - East Coast Settlement Report [pdf, 1.1 MB]

   ...Zealand Cataloguing-in-Publication Data New Zealand. Waitangi Tribunal. The East Coast settlement report. (Waitangi Tribunal report) ISBN 978-1-86956-297-7 1. Te Rūnanga o Ngāti Porou. 2. Maori (New Zealand people)—New Zealand—Gisborne Region—Claims. 3. Ngāti Porou (New Zealand people)—Claims. [1. Tiriti o Waitangi. reo 2. Mana whenua. reo] I. Title. II. Series. 333.330899944209344—dc22 www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Typeset by the Waitangi Tribunal This report was previo...

3. [2015] NZEmpC 33 Rimene v Doherty [pdf, 73 KB]

   ...[4] Mr Parker then made application for a further fixture to enable the plaintiff’s case to proceed on a formal proof basis. That application was granted and at the hearing on 10 March 2015, Mr Rimene gave evidence on oath establishing his claim to the satisfaction of the Court. [5] Notice of the fixture had been served on Mr Doherty and the trustee of his bankrupt estate in Australia. Inquiries made by the Registrar established that the Official Assignee in New Zealand had...

4. [2021] NZEmpC 6 Bowen v Bank of New Zealand [pdf, 251 KB]

   ...MELISSA BOWEN v BANK OF NEW ZEALAND [2021] NZEmpC 6 [4 February 2021] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2021] NZEmpC 6 EMPC 261/2020 IN THE MATTER OF an application for special leave to remove a proceeding to the Employment Court AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for orders in respect of privileged communications BETWEEN MELISSA BOWEN Applicant AND BANK...

5. Karena v Haines-Winiata - Te Koau A Trust (2015) 43 Takitimu MB 200 (43 TKT 200) [pdf, 217 KB]

   ...[2] In particular, Mr Karena refers to the landlocked status of Te Koau and his efforts, he says, to have access secured through neighbouring properties. In that context, Mr Karena has alleged that the trustees have failed to respond to his requests to discuss the terms of a lease of the land and specifically the issue of lack of access. Mr Karena further claims that the trustees’ failure to support his application for access against Big Hill Station Limited is a further groun...

6. INZ (Calder) v Tian [2019] NZIACDT 48 (19 July 2019) [pdf, 387 KB]

   ...provided. Ms Tian referred to another decision of the IPT. [10] It was Ms Tian’s personal recommendation that it would be beneficial for the immigration officer to liaise with other named officers and to seek guidance in relation to Mr Z’s application. These officers could provide a ‘heads up’ as to acceptable requests for an IELTS certificate. [11] Two additional character references were provided. According to Ms Tian, they attested to Mr Z’s command of English a...

7. Panchalingam v Accident Compensation Corporation (Leave to Appeal) [2024] NZACC 75 [pdf, 189 KB]

   ...Spiller set out in his judgment the factual background as summarised below. [4] The applicant had cover for shoulder and back injuries sustained in an accident at work on 26 September 2013, when he was lifting heavy boxes. Weekly compensation was claimed. [5] The Corporation investigated the claim, seeking notes from the applicant’s General Practitioner, which included references to consultations in August and November 2010, in relation to back pain. [6] The Corporation refe...

8. [2017] NZEmpC 106 Crimson Consulting Ltd v Berry (No 2) [pdf, 100 KB]

   ...[1] In my judgment of 3 August 2017, I allowed a challenge regarding non-publication orders, in part, indicating that I was satisfied that it would be appropriate to make an interim order of non-publication of commercially sensitive information, and of allegations which are alleged to be irrelevant to this proceeding. 1 [2] Although counsel had drafted and provided a form of interim order for the Court’s consideration, it related only to documentary evidence, and would not...

9. NL & UN v ME [2022] NZDT 88 (8 June 2022) [pdf, 180 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 88 APPLICANT NL APPLICANT UN RESPONDENT ME The Tribunal orders: ME is to pay NL and UN $15,000.00 on or before Wednesday 6 July 2022. Reasons: 1. On 19 August 2020, ME provided a pre-inspection report on [Address] that NL and UN relied upon when bidding on the house. This report stated at page 15 that the concrete si...

10. HZ v JS [2023] NZDT 8 (6 March 2023) [pdf, 185 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 8 APPLICANT HZ RESPONDENT JS The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. In November 2022, HZ was looking to buy a 7-seater vehicle. 2. JS had advertised a [car] for sale on Facebook. 3. HZ travelled to [City 1] to view the vehicle and after a short test drive he bought the vehicle for $4,250.00. 4....