Search Results

Search results for claim form.

12946 items matching your search terms

  1. ACB v ZYC and ZYB [2010] NZDT 77 (9 November 2010) [pdf, 79 KB]

    IN THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2010] NZDT 77 BETWEEN ACB APPLICANT AND ZYC FIRST RESPONDENT ZYB SECOND RESPONDENT Date of Order: 9 November 2010 Referee: Referee C Smith ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that the Respondents pay the Applicant the sum of $2,534.37 directly within 21 days of today’s date. The counterclaim is dismissed due to failure of proof. Facts [1] The material facts ar...

  2. N Ltd v BS & TS [2023] NZDT 164 (9 May 2023) [pdf, 183 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 164 APPLICANT N Ltd RESPONDENT BS and TS The Tribunal orders: BS and TS are to pay N Ltd $15,182.00 by 23 May 2023. Reasons: 1. In September 2022, N Ltd did roofing work for BS and TS. N Ltd wants to be paid its invoice for $25,995.75. 2. BS and TS say the amount invoiced is excessive. They have obtained a report from a...

  3. Wilson v Welch [pdf, 53 KB]

    IN THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL Claim No: 04734 UNDER the Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2002 IN THE MATTER of an Adjudication BETWEEN NEVILLE WILLIAM WILSON and PAUL CECIL WASHER as TRUSTEES for THE NEVILLE WILSON FAMILY TRUST Claimant AND PAUL WELCH and SUZANNE WELCH First Respondents AND ROBIN BAILLIE (Removed) Second Respondent AND GRANT KNOWLES Third Respondent AND GIANNI MARCHESAN Fourth Respondent AND GRAEME JOHNSON (N...

  4. Eggers v Wellington City Council [2011] NZWHT Wellington 26 [pdf, 104 KB]

    ...meet their own costs and expenses. Compare: 2002 No 47 [3] The presumption in s 91 is that costs cannot be awarded unless either of the preconditions is met. Brooker accepts that this is the position. Page 3 [4] The basis of this application is that the allegations were made without substantial merit. THE CLAIM [5] In the particulars of claim filed with the application in this matter the claimant alleged that Brooker owed a duty of care to supply building m...

  5. Galvin [2011] NZWHT Auckland 10 [pdf, 91 KB]

    ...49 of the Act provides that a claimant may apply to the Chair seeking a review of a decision that their claim does not comply with the 2 eligibility criteria within 20 working days of receiving notice of the decision. On receiving such an application I must decide whether or not the claim meets the eligibility criteria. [4] I have considered the following documents in conducting my review: The application for review and attached submission. The letter from Derek Sharp of...

  6. River Oaks Farm Ltd & Ors as Trustees of Ingodwe Trust v Olsson [2010] NZWHT Wellington 17 [pdf, 108 KB]

    ...Eleventh Respondent Decision: 16 June 2010 COSTS DETERMINATION Adjudicator: C Ruthe pg. 2 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................... 1 APPLICATION BY SEVENTH RESPONDENTS FOR COSTS .............................. 2 The Law............................................................................................................... 2 Did the claim have substantial merit? ........

  7. BORA-advice-Contracts-of-Insurance-Bill-PUBLISHED.pdf [pdf, 250 KB]

    ...minimising costs and impacts on insurers’ willingness to provide insurance in New Zealand. 6. The Bill consolidates statutes and key aspects of the common law relating to insurance which are currently fragmented across 6 different Acts. It: a. reforms the law relating to the disclosure of information by policyholders to insurers before an insurance contract is entered into or varied, b. modifies the law relating to the duty of utmost good faith that all insurance contracts are ba...

  8. [2021] NZEmpC 28 Juyi International Ltd v Pan [pdf, 198 KB]

    ...holiday pay. It is alleged that the Authority made an order which would unjustly enrich Mr Pan. [6] Juyi accordingly seeks a stay of the order requiring it to pay holiday entitlements pending the hearing of its challenge. It asserts that its claim is strong, and that were it to succeed in the hearing of its challenge having paid the contested sum to Mr Pan, recovery would be problematic because he would be unlikely to voluntarily return the monies paid. [7] Mr Pan filed a notic...

  9. OIA-103324.pdf [pdf, 779 KB]

    Section (9)(2)(a) Tena koe- FIMRIPII Justice Centre I 19 Aitken Street DX SX10088 I Wellington T 04 918 8800 I F 04 918 8820 ContactUs@Justice.govt.nz I www.justice.govt.nz Official Information Act request: Concurrent and cumulative sentences Thank you for your email of 15 March 2023 requesting, under the Official Information Act 1982 (the Act), documents produced or received by the Ministry of Justice (the Ministry) regarding concurrent and cumulative sentences since 1 January 2...