Search Results

1. INZ (Carley) v De'Ath [2018] NZIACDT 45 (13 November 2018) [pdf, 213 KB]

   ...advised Immigration New Zealand he had not entered into a written agreement with Mr De’Ath. Mr S said that Mr De’Ath did not provide a letter of engagement until 9 December 2016, after his visa had already been approved. Immigration New Zealand formally raises professional obligations [9] Immigration New Zealand’s Manila branch sent a formal letter to Mr De’Ath on 16 December 2016 regarding his practices. It stated that he was associated with unlicensed individuals who app...

2. TT v Q Ltd [2023] NZDT 460 (29 August 2023) [pdf, 160 KB]

   ...agreement with Q Ltd and worked for them as an associate real estate agent. He began working with Q Ltd in August 2022, the contractor agreement was signed in October 2022, and his contract was terminated without notice by Q Ltd in April 2023. 2. TT claims commission payments for two properties for which he did work while working as an associate for Q Ltd. There is a dispute about the interpretation of the commission schedule contained within the signed contract. TT also claims inter...

3. IX Group Ltd v UU Ltd [2020] NZDT 1375 (8 October 2020) [pdf, 199 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2020] NZDT 1375 APPLICANT (respondent in counterclaim) IX Group Limited RESPONDENT UU Ltd SECOND RESPONDENT (applicant in counterclaim) OADN Limited The Tribunal hereby orders: IX Group Limited is to pay OADN Limited $5,459.63 by Friday 30 October 2020. IX Group Limited’s claim is dismissed. Reason...

4. CO v B Ltd & Q Ltd [2024] NZDT 718 (16 September 2024) [pdf, 126 KB]

   Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 718 APPLICANT CO RESPONDENT B Ltd SECOND RESPONDENT Q Ltd The Tribunal orders: Q Ltd is to pay $4,178.80 to CO on or before Friday 11 October 2024. Reasons 1. In February 2024, CO purchased a [vehicle] from Q Ltd after seeing it advertised [online]. Prior to the sale, on 7 February, CO exchanged emails with QW, the director of Q Ltd regarding the...

5. OV v PG LCRO 250 / 2010 and 242 / 2011 (7 August 2012) [pdf, 79 KB]

   ...advanced for the Applicant’s appeal, the Court concluded that no issue before it (including evidence not put before the jury) would have led to a different outcome. Considerations [15] I have considered all of the evidence on the files and the claims made by the Applicant, and his complaints. It is my view that no part of the Practitioner’s actions, whether alleged as acts or omissions, led to the Applicant’s conviction. [16] The complaint that the Applicant did not have...

6. [2023] NZEmpC 59 Hamilton Civil Plant Ltd v Carr [pdf, 186 KB]

   HAMILTON CIVIL PLANT LIMITED v HARRY CARR [2023] NZEmpC 59 [18 April 2023] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2023] NZEmpC 59 EMPC 405/2022 IN THE MATTER OF an application to extend time to file a challenge BETWEEN HAMILTON CIVIL PLANT LIMITED Applicant AND HARRY CARR Respondent Hearing: On the papers Appearances: R Negri, agent for the applicant G Ogilvie, advo...

7. SS v SH [2022] NZDT 230 (29 November 2022) [pdf, 113 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 230 APPLICANT SS RESPONDENT SH The Tribunal orders: Claim: The claim is dismissed. Counterclaim: SS is to pay SH $3,000.00 within 28 days. Reasons [1] SS engaged SH to install a “flat-pack” kitchen in her home. The work was done, but the parties do not agree on the price that SS is liable to pay SH for the work....

8. [2023] NZEnvC 216 Currie v Palmerston North City Council [pdf, 185 KB]

   ..._________________________________________________________________ DECISION OF THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AS TO COSTS _________________________________________________________________ A: Costs awarded 2 REASONS Introduction [1] This costs decision arises in respect of an application made by a party (initially) described as Soul Friend Pet Cremations (the Applicant) which sought resource consent from Palmerston North City Council (the Council) to establish what was describ...

9. [2024] NZEmpC 153 M v Q [pdf, 179 KB]

   ...ORDER ANONYMISING NAMES AND IDENTIFYING DETAILS OF THE PARTIES IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2024] NZEmpC 153 EMPC 131/2023 IN THE MATTER OF an application for a non-publication or anonymising order BETWEEN M Applicant AND Q Respondent Hearing: On the papers Appearances: Applicant in person P Skelton KC, counsel for respondent Judgment...

10. [2015] NZEmpC 166 Able Owl XL Ltd v Gladden [pdf, 195 KB]

    ...compensation. The second determination made an award of costs against Able Owl. [2] Able Owl elected to challenge the whole of both determinations in this Court and a hearing de novo was sought. The pleadings are contained in an amended statement of claim dated 17 September 2014 and a statement of defence to that 1 Gladden v Able Owl XL Ltd [2014] NZERA Auckland 329 (substantive); Gladden v Able Owl XL Ltd [2014] NZERA Auckland...