Search Results

1. Cock - Succession to Paora Kingi [2020] Chief Judge's MB 50 (2020 CJ 50) [pdf, 278 KB]

   ...AOTEA In the Māori Land Court of New Zealand Aotea District A20190006272 CJ 2019/19 WĀHANGA Section 45, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 Under MŌ TE TAKE Paora Kingi In the matter of MARAMA COCK Te Kaitono Applicant Nohoanga: 6 November 2019, 2019 Chief Judge’s MB 1277-1285 Hearing (Heard at Whanganui) Whakataunga: 4 February 2020 Judgment date TE WHAKATAUNGA Ā KAIWHAKAWĀ MATUA TUARUA C L FOX Judgment of Deputy Chief Jud...

2. Recording Industry Association of New Zealand v Telecom NZ 4366 [2013] NZCOP 11 [pdf, 215 KB]

   [2013] NZCOP 11 COP 009/13 UNDER The Copyright Act 1994 BETWEEN RECORDING INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION NEW ZEALAND Applicant AND TELECOM NZ 4366 Respondent BEFORE THE COPYRIGHT TRIBUNAL Jane Glover DECISION ON THE PAPERS Introduction [1] This case concerns alleged file sharing infringement under s.122A-U of the Copyright Act 1994 (“the Act”). 1 Sections 122A-U of the Act set out a process for copyright owners to use when they consider that an...

3. EN v ML [2022] NZDT 257 (19 December 2022) [pdf, 188 KB]

   ...something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehearing, you can apply online, download a form from the Disputes Tribunal website or obtain an application form from any Tribunal office. The application must be lodged within 20 working days of the decision having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Reheari...

4. M Ltd v CQ [2023] NZDT 571 (17 November 2023) [pdf, 90 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 571 APPLICANT M Ltd RESPONDENT CQ The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. M Ltd was engaged by CQ to provide digging services in preparation for siting of a tiny home. An initial price of $7668.18 was too high for CQ’s budget so the scope of work was adjusted and M Ltd provided a new price of $2730.05 which was ac...

5. QH v N Ltd & T Ltd [2024] NZDT 523 (8 July 2024) [pdf, 187 KB]

   ...something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehearing, you can apply online, download a form from the Disputes Tribunal website or obtain an application form from any Tribunal office. The application must be lodged within 20 working days of the decision having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Reheari...

6. White v Rodney District Council [pdf, 24 KB]

   ...The Tribunal orders the correction of that date to read 13 February 2002, pursuant to section 92(2)(b) of the Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2006 (the Act). This section empowers the Tribunal to correct minor errors. Costs Application 3. On 16 March 2009, the claimants, through their counsel, filed a comprehensive memorandum seeking an award of costs against the second respondent, Mrs L J Kerkin, of $50,000 together with disbursements of $23,509.50. The ap...

7. [2012] NZEmpC 121 Hally Labels Ltd v Powell [pdf, 55 KB]

   HALLY LABELS LIMITED V KEVIN POWELL NZEmpC AK [2012] NZEmpC 121 [25 July 2012] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2012] NZEmpC 121 ARC 35/11 IN THE MATTER OF an application for a freezing order AND IN THE MATTER OF proceedings removed BETWEEN HALLY LABELS LIMITED Plaintiff AND KEVIN POWELL Defendant Hearing: By submissions filed on 26 June and 23 July 2012 (Heard at Auckland) Counsel: Chris Patterson, counsel for plaintiff Andrew Gallie...

8. MK v S Ltd [2023] NZDT 293 (1 August 2023) [pdf, 196 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 293 APPLICANT MK RESPONDENT S Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. S Ltd is to pay MK $4,397.12 on or before Friday 25 August 2023. 2. MK is to safely pack up and arrange for the return all the curtains purchased from S Ltd to them, with shipping of the boxes with the curtains to be paid for by S Ltd. Reasons: 3. MK, th...

9. HD v NU [2023] NZDT 118 (9 March 2023) [pdf, 201 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 118 APPLICANT HD RESPONDENT NU The Tribunal orders: NU is to pay $8,908.83 to HD on or before Friday 24 March 2023. Reasons: 1. HD purchased a four hectare lifestyle property from NU pursuant to a written agreement dated 25 November 2021. On 28 January 2022 HD took possession and within two weeks the toilet overflowe...

10. BM & OT v OE & DE [2023] NZDT 459 (5 July 2023) [pdf, 201 KB]

    ...459 APPLICANT BM and OT RESPONDENT OE and DE The Tribunal orders: OE and DE are to pay $30,000.00 to BM and OT by 1/8/23. Reasons: 1. This order should be read with that dated 17/3/23. Misrepresentation? 2. The applicants rely on the applicable clauses in the sale and purchase agreement as to misrepresentation. It is important to note again that a representation to be a misrepresentation does not need to be intentionally false, it may be innocently ma...