12946 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2020] NZDT 1321 APPLICANT TN WL RESPONDENT JH and GG The Tribunal orders: 1. JH and GG are to pay to TN and WL the sum of $1,450.00 on or before 30 September 2020. Reasons 1. In July 2020, TN and WL (the purchasers) bought a Mazda Demio from Mr H and Ms G (the sellers) for $1,800.00. 2. The car has turned out to be too ru
...something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehearing, you can apply online, download a form from the Disputes Tribunal website or obtain an application form from any Tribunal office. The application must be lodged within 28 days of the decision having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Rehearing Out o...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 94 APPLICANT MS RESPONDENT O Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. In August 2021, a Japanese Company, F Ltd, sold a [vehicle] to O Trust and the vehicle was imported into New Zealand (the first agreement). The vehicle arrived in on or about 6 November 2021, but was not given a VIN number and so could not...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 278 APPLICANT KC APPLICANT TC RESPONDENT B Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. TC purchased tickets for return flights for himself and KC to [Country 1] with the return flight having a short stopover at [City] in [Country 2]. The purchase was made directly from the B Ltd website and not through a travel ag...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 649 APPLICANT BC Limited RESPONDENT NQ Limited The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. In June 2021 BC Ltd (BC) entered into a general agency agreement with NQ Limited (NQ) in relation to premises in [suburb]. In January 2022 BC presented NQ with an offer to lease part of the premises from BU Limited. This offer...
...matter in a reserved decision dated 9 February 2015. 1 [2] On 5 February 2015 the respondents applied to dismiss or transfer the substantive proceedings on the basis that this Court did not have jurisdiction to hear what is essentially a civil claim unrelated to Māori freehold land. [3] In an oral judgment dated 5 May 2015 I concluded that this Court lacked jurisdiction. I reserved leave to counsel for the applicants to elect either the District or High Court civil jurisdiction f...
...help. We’ve also included links to the Operational Policy along with answers to questions raised during the FLAS, Family Legal Aid Changes and Review of Family Fixed Fees Webinar. The FLAS went live on 31 March 2014. Since then, more than 230 claims have been paid to FLAS providers. Eligibility compliance checks We’ll shortly be starting compliance checks on groups of FLAS providers. The aim is to check that only eligible clients are receiving the funded service and that any...
...to a plethora of telephone conversations. [5] At some stage between 5 March 2009 and 29 May 2009, the Respondent ceased his association with CU and the Applicant’s file was in the care of other lawyers engaged by CU. [6] The Applicant’s claim was unsuccessful following a ruling by the Employment Relations Authority that the Applicant was not an employee and a costs order was made against him. [7] The Applicant alleges that he was led to believe by the Respondent that his cla...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 6 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 58 APPLICANT SI RESPONDENT HD Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim by SI against HD Ltd is dismissed. 2. The counterclaim by HD Ltd against SI is proved and SI is to pay HD Ltd the sum of $14,145.16 on or by 5:00 pm on 2 March 2023. Reasons 1. SI entered into a secured credit agreement with HD Ltd on 07 M...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 6 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 243 APPLICANT QB RESPONDENT T Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim and counterclaim are both dismissed. Reasons: 1. QB and her fiancé booked a wedding package at T Ltd and paid a deposit of $17,000.00. The package enabled QB to opt out of some elements of the package and receive a reduction in the total price of the package. QB opted...