Search Results

1. Guo v PwC (Non-Party Discovery - Oral Hearing) [2020] NZHRRT 51 [pdf, 208 KB]

   ...22 December 2020 MINUTE OF CHAIRPERSON FOLLOWING TELECONFERENCE ON 18 DECEMBER 2020 AT 10AM1 [1] As required by the Minute dated 30 October 2020 at [20.1] CityMed Medical Centre Ltd (CityMed) has filed a notice of opposition to the application by Ms Guo for non-party discovery against CityMed and to the application for a witness summons addressed to CityMed staff. The notice of opposition is accompanied by an affidavit sworn by Dr SJ Culpan who, prior to his retirement, pr...

2. INZ (Carley) v De'Ath [2018] NZIACDT 45 (13 November 2018) [pdf, 213 KB]

   ...advised Immigration New Zealand he had not entered into a written agreement with Mr De’Ath. Mr S said that Mr De’Ath did not provide a letter of engagement until 9 December 2016, after his visa had already been approved. Immigration New Zealand formally raises professional obligations [9] Immigration New Zealand’s Manila branch sent a formal letter to Mr De’Ath on 16 December 2016 regarding his practices. It stated that he was associated with unlicensed individuals who app...

3. [2024] NZEmpC 43 Mutonhori v Wairoa District Council [pdf, 181 KB]

   ...NEW ZEALAND WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2024] NZEmpC 43 EMPC 321/2023 IN THE MATTER OF challenges to determinations of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for security for costs BETWEEN SIMON MUTONHORI Plaintiff AND WAIROA DISTRICT COUNCIL Defendant Hearing: On the papers Appearances: S Mutonhori, plaintiff in person C McGuinness, coun...

4. [2016] NZEmpC 95 Pretorius v Marra Construction (2004) Ltd [pdf, 270 KB]

   ...bonus, and that the claim for entitlements under the MW Act were brought in time. In a judgment of 11 December 2015, I extended leave for this purpose, and Marra accordingly initiated its challenge. 3 [6] Subsequently the Authority declined an application made by Mr Pretorius to remove the various remuneration issues to the Court. 4 The context within which this application arose involved a range of claims; Mr Pretorius had brought actions for unpaid monies but he had also raise...

5. [2024] NZEmpC 153 M v Q [pdf, 179 KB]

   ...ORDER ANONYMISING NAMES AND IDENTIFYING DETAILS OF THE PARTIES IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2024] NZEmpC 153 EMPC 131/2023 IN THE MATTER OF an application for a non-publication or anonymising order BETWEEN M Applicant AND Q Respondent Hearing: On the papers Appearances: Applicant in person P Skelton KC, counsel for respondent Judgment...

6. ET and JT v F Ltd [2021] NZDT 1639 (13 July 2021) [pdf, 197 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1639 APPLICANT ET and JT RESPONDENT F Ltd The Tribunal orders: Claim: The claim for $10,420.73 is dismissed; and The Tribunal declares that ET and JT are not liable to pay F Ltd’s invoice number 0045 dated 27 January 2021 for $18,828.38. Counterclaim: The counterclaim is dismissed. JT is added as a joint appli...

7. FT v BF Ltd [2023] NZDT 793 (20 December 2023) [pdf, 231 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 793 APPLICANT FT RESPONDENT BF Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. BF Ltd is to pay FT the sum of $13,643.10 on or before 31 January 2024. 2. BF Ltd’s claim for damages is dismissed, and the claim for the removal of the veranda is struck out. Reasons: 1. FT purchased a property in [street] from BF Ltd. Settlement was on 30 Novem...

8. [2012] NZEmpC 87 Haig v Edgewater Developers & Ors [pdf, 55 KB]

   ...DEVELOPERS LIMITED NZEmpC AK [2012] NZEmpC 87 [6 June 2012] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2012] NZEmpC 87 ARC 30/10 IN THE MATTER OF proceedings removed from the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF interlocutory applications BETWEEN ROBERT HAIG Plaintiff AND EDGEWATER DEVELOPERS LIMITED First Defendant AND CARRINGTON FARMS LIMITED Second Defendant AND PH II INCORPORATED Third Defendant Hearing: 6 June 2012 b...

9. LK v H Ltd [2022] NZDT 28 (1 March 2022) [pdf, 181 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 28 APPLICANT LK RESPONDENT H Ltd t/a TT c/- X Ltd The Tribunal orders: LK’s claim against H Ltd t/a TT is dismissed. Reasons: 1. This claim is about the refund of fees paid for swimming lessons. LK says they had booked swimming lessons for his daughters in term 3 (2021) at TT, [City]. They specifically want...

10. MO v D Ltd [2024] NZDT 367 (20 June 2024) [pdf, 186 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 367 APPLICANT MO RESPONDENT D Ltd APPLICANT'S INSURER (if applicable) J Ltd The Tribunal orders: D Ltd is to pay MO $2,488.00 within 28 days. Reasons [1] MO purchased from a supermarket a [snack] manufactured by D Ltd, represented by MC. Embedded in it was a date pit which, when MO bit on it on 17 January 2024, caused breakage...