13124 items matching your search terms
HAMILTON CIVIL PLANT LIMITED v HARRY CARR [2023] NZEmpC 59 [18 April 2023] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2023] NZEmpC 59 EMPC 405/2022 IN THE MATTER OF an application to extend time to file a challenge BETWEEN HAMILTON CIVIL PLANT LIMITED Applicant AND HARRY CARR Respondent Hearing: On the papers Appearances: R Negri, agent for the applicant G Ogilvie, advo...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 72 APPLICANT MQ RESPONDENT X Ltd SECOND RESPONDENT N Ltd RESPONDENT INSURER (if applicable) Z Insurance The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Background 1. MQ owns a 1988 [vehicle]. The vehicle has a targa-style removable hard top roof. The roof is attached to the vehicle with hex (Allen key) bolts....
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 51 APPLICANT SC RESPONDENT CX The Tribunal orders: CX is to pay SC the sum of $650.00 within 28 days of the date of this order. Reasons 1. On Monday 17 April 2023, SC purchased from CX a [car] for $11,000.00 after seeing it advertised [online], and after viewing it and taking it for a test drive. 2. Two days after SC purchased...
..._________________________________________________________________ DECISION OF THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AS TO COSTS _________________________________________________________________ A: Costs awarded 2 REASONS Introduction [1] This costs decision arises in respect of an application made by a party (initially) described as Soul Friend Pet Cremations (the Applicant) which sought resource consent from Palmerston North City Council (the Council) to establish what was describ...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2017] NZDT 1524 APPLICANTS BS and NE RESPONDENT RB Ltd The Tribunal hereby orders: 1. RB Ltd is to pay BS and NE $2,270.00 by 4pm on 11 May 2017. 2. BS and NE are to transfer the ownership of the car to RB Ltd at the time payment is made. Reasons 1. BS and NE bought a car on Trademe from a seller known as “C”, for...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2019] NZDT 1555 APPLICANT LO RESPONDENT BH Ltd The Tribunal hereby orders: 1. BH Ltd is to pay LO $2,700.00 by 5 pm Friday 23 August 2019. 2. BH Ltd is to collect the sofa suite (the 3-seater, 2-seater and 2 single armchairs) within five working days of payment being made to LO in accordance with order 1. above. If BH Lt...
...something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehearing, you can apply online, download a form from the Disputes Tribunal website or obtain an application form from any Tribunal office. The application must be lodged within 20 working days of the decision having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Reheari...
...advanced for the Applicant’s appeal, the Court concluded that no issue before it (including evidence not put before the jury) would have led to a different outcome. Considerations [15] I have considered all of the evidence on the files and the claims made by the Applicant, and his complaints. It is my view that no part of the Practitioner’s actions, whether alleged as acts or omissions, led to the Applicant’s conviction. [16] The complaint that the Applicant did not have...
...had been adjudged bankrupt, and the Respondent and Mr GB wished to be satisfied that any distribution to the Applicant would not be subjected to “claw-back” by the equivalent in Australia of the Official Assignee in Bankruptcy. [7] They also requested that the proposed distribution be consented to by the Applicant‟s family, who were also discretionary beneficiaries under the Trusts. [8] A deed was prepared by the Respondent with regard to the proposed distribution, which inclu...
...agreement with Q Ltd and worked for them as an associate real estate agent. He began working with Q Ltd in August 2022, the contractor agreement was signed in October 2022, and his contract was terminated without notice by Q Ltd in April 2023. 2. TT claims commission payments for two properties for which he did work while working as an associate for Q Ltd. There is a dispute about the interpretation of the commission schedule contained within the signed contract. TT also claims inter...