13124 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2020] NZDT 1375 APPLICANT (respondent in counterclaim) IX Group Limited RESPONDENT UU Ltd SECOND RESPONDENT (applicant in counterclaim) OADN Limited The Tribunal hereby orders: IX Group Limited is to pay OADN Limited $5,459.63 by Friday 30 October 2020. IX Group Limited’s claim is dismissed. Reason...
Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 718 APPLICANT CO RESPONDENT B Ltd SECOND RESPONDENT Q Ltd The Tribunal orders: Q Ltd is to pay $4,178.80 to CO on or before Friday 11 October 2024. Reasons 1. In February 2024, CO purchased a [vehicle] from Q Ltd after seeing it advertised [online]. Prior to the sale, on 7 February, CO exchanged emails with QW, the director of Q Ltd regarding the...
...plaintiff as a computer repair technician at its Ashburton store until his dismissal for redundancy in September 2009. In 2011, the defendant commenced proceedings in the Authority alleging, amongst other things, unjustifiable dismissal. That claim was dismissed by the Authority1 which subsequently issued a costs determination.2 1 [2012] NZERA Christchurch 96. The defendant was ordered to pay the plaintiff $3,500 for costs and $...
...NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2022] NZEmpC 180 EMPC 402/2021 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of an application for a strike out order AND IN THE MATTER of an application for costs BETWEEN KARL MALCOLM First Plaintiff AND CAROL WARING Second Plaintiff AND PHILLIPA MCDERMOTT Third Plaintiff...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 230 APPLICANT SS RESPONDENT SH The Tribunal orders: Claim: The claim is dismissed. Counterclaim: SS is to pay SH $3,000.00 within 28 days. Reasons [1] SS engaged SH to install a “flat-pack” kitchen in her home. The work was done, but the parties do not agree on the price that SS is liable to pay SH for the work....
SUMMARY Case: Mayfair Street Units v Spargo File No: TRI 2009-101-000015 to 18/ DBH 05319, 05320, 05322 & 05326 Court: WHT Adjudicator: C Ruthe Date of Decision: 21 December 2009 Background This claim relates to two consolidated claims whereby the respondents involved in both claims are identical. This decision thereby considered issues of liability and apportionment together. The first claim relates to Unit 11 owned by Mr and Mrs Franklin which was for $255,049.09...
...compensation. The second determination made an award of costs against Able Owl. [2] Able Owl elected to challenge the whole of both determinations in this Court and a hearing de novo was sought. The pleadings are contained in an amended statement of claim dated 17 September 2014 and a statement of defence to that 1 Gladden v Able Owl XL Ltd [2014] NZERA Auckland 329 (substantive); Gladden v Able Owl XL Ltd [2014] NZERA Auckland...
...referral under s 48 of the Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007 BY The Registrar of Immigration Advisers Registrar BETWEEN Kentaro Shihaku Complainant AND Kotaro Mizoguchi Adviser DECISION APPLICATION FOR THE TRIBUNAL TO WITHDRAW ON THE GROUNDS OF BIAS AND MISCONDUCT REPRESENTATION: Registrar: Mr A Dumbleton, lawyer, MBIE, Auckland. Complainant: Mr Tan Otomo (agent). Adviser: Mr A J B Holmes, lawyer, Auckland....
...Waiariki MB 151 (34 WAR 151) A20110005116 UNDER Sections 19 and 237, Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Whakapoungakau 24 block BETWEEN JILLIAN NAERA, ERIC HODGE, WARWICK MOREHU, ANAHA MOREHU, AND KEREAMA PENE Applicants AND PIRIHIRA FENWICK, WIREMU KINGI, AND HIWINUI HEKE Respondents Hearing: 33 Waiariki MB 147 dated 30 May 2011 (Heard at Rotorua) Appearances: H Aikman QC and N Van der Wal, for the Applicants D Hurd and...
...OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2024] NZEmpC 32 EMPC 52/2022 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for recusal BETWEEN ALLAN HALSE First Plaintiff AND CULTURESAFE NZ LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION) Second Plaintiff AND HAMILTON CITY COUNCIL Defendant Hearing: On the papers Appearances:...