12950 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 63 APPLICANT KH APPLICANT KX RESPONDENT MX The Tribunal orders: KH ’s claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. KH and KX claim that MX sold them [the car] on the 3 December 2021 knowing that the wiring had been chewed by a rat and that this had damaged electrical parts of the vehicle. KH and KX says that the
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 8 APPLICANT HI RESPONDENT B Ltd The Tribunal orders: B Ltd is to pay to HI the sum of $400.00 on or before 22 March 2024. Reasons: 1. In November 2023, HI was travelling to [City] with his family, which included young children. 2. HI had made a booking through a third party online booking platform for a one night stay a...
...something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehearing, you can apply online, download a form from the Disputes Tribunal website or obtain an application form from any Tribunal office. The application must be lodged within 20 working days of the decision having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Reheari...
...Act). Mr Wade ceased his employment 1 [2011] NZERA Auckland 548. with the company in 2005. Almost a year and a half after the March 2004 payment, Mr Wade notified the defendant of a further claim. This asserted that the 9 March 2004 settlement had been for the sum of $70,000 and so had been short-paid $30,000. Hume Pak-N-Cool Limited (Hume) did not accept that further claim and Mr Wade issued proceedings in the Employment Rel...
225 Waiariki MB 63 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WAIARIKI DISTRICT A20190003626 UNDER Section 281, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Potikirua Incorporation BETWEEN HUHANA ARTHUR Applicant AND THE PROPRIETORS OF POTIKIRUA INCORPORATION Respondents Hearing: 8 May 2019, 212 Waiariki MB 61-70 (Heard at Rotorua) Appearances: C Bidois for the applicant Judgment: 3 December 2019...
Claim No: 2109 Under the Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2002 In the matter of an adjudication claim Between Andre De Wet and Annette Cornelia De Wet Claimants And North Shore City Council First respondent And Grant Hearle Williams Second respondent And Jason Thomas Williams Third respondent And Grant Hearle Williams and Jason Thomas Williams and Desmond Sarjant Williams as trustees of Aladdin Trust Fourth respondents And Anthon...
...when he turned 65. On 24 August 2012, the Ministry wrote to the appellant advising him that he was required to test his entitlement to a benefit or pension from the United Kingdom. The appellant subsequently confirmed that he had sent completed application forms direct to the United Kingdom Pension Service (UKPS). The Ministry asked the appellant to notify it of the decision. [3] It appears that the Ministry did not follow up on the appellant’s application for a United Ki...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 80 APPLICANT BT RESPONDENT PO Ltd The Tribunal orders: BT’s claim against PO Ltd is dismissed. Reasons 1. On 16 August 2021, BT contacted PO Ltd and enquired about having an airbag light issue in his vehicle repaired. He was given an estimate over the phone of $500.00 for the job. On 17 August 2021, BT dropped his car off to t...
...NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2024] NZEmpC 141 EMPC 384/2023 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application to dismiss proceedings AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for unless orders BETWEEN ANDREW BYRNE Plaintiff AND COVERSTAFF RECRUITMENT LIMITED Defendant Hearing: On the papers Appear...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1683 APPLICANT QD and XD RESPONDENT QN The Tribunal orders: QN is to pay QD and XD $300.00 within 28 days. Reasons [1] QD and XD claim from QN a refund of the deposit that they paid for the uncompleted purchase of a puppy from her. QN denies liability for any repayment. [2] QD and XD saw an advertisement on Trademe for