Search Results

1. QD & XD v QN [2021] NZDT 1683 (10 December 2021) [pdf, 181 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1683 APPLICANT QD and XD RESPONDENT QN The Tribunal orders: QN is to pay QD and XD $300.00 within 28 days. Reasons [1] QD and XD claim from QN a refund of the deposit that they paid for the uncompleted purchase of a puppy from her. QN denies liability for any repayment. [2] QD and XD saw an advertisement on Trademe for

2. LW v QT Ltd [2023] NZDT 170 (7 June 2023) [pdf, 219 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 170 APPLICANT LW RESPONDENT QT Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. QT Ltd is to pay to LW the sum of $150.00 on or before 28 June 2023. 2. LW is not liable to pay $75.00 or any further amount to QT Ltd in respect of the breach notice in dispute in this claim. Reasons: 1. On 19 February 2023, LW parked her car i...

3. [2021] NZEmpC 90 OSS Ltd v Arthur [pdf, 264 KB]

   ...individual employment agreement (IEA) had been breached as to the calculation and payment of the variable component of his salary; the second was whether his dismissal for redundancy was justified. [3] The Employment Relations Authority declined his claim for breach of his IEA.1 It upheld his personal grievance, and directed OSS to pay him, within 28 days:2 i) $20,000 for humiliation, loss of dignity and injury to feelings; ii) $52,500 as reimbursement of lost wages; and iii)...

4. XN v Ji [2019] NZIACDT 67 (1 October 2019) Sanctions [pdf, 186 KB]

   ...2019 seeks compensation for the loss the complainant has suffered. [16] Mr Chen observes that the application for residence was declined because the complainant did not provide evidence as to how she had acquired all of her nominated funds, as requested by the immigration officer. It is contended that the complainant had not been aware that this information had been requested. This occurred because the application was not undertaken by Mr Ji but instead the work was given to unq...

5. Hettig v ANZ Bank of New Zealand Ltd - Lot 1 Deposited Plan 158328, CT NA95A/121 (2014) 93 Taitokerau MB 238 (93 TTK 238) [pdf, 220 KB]

   ...MB 238 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAITOKERAU DISTRICT A20140012790 UNDER Section 19, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Lot 1 Deposited Plan 158328, CT NA95A/121 BETWEEN JOHN HETTIG Applicant AND ANZ BANK OF NEW ZEALAND LIMITED Respondent Hearing: 12 December 2014 15 December 2014 (Heard at Whangarei) Appearances: Mr John Hettig for Kaiawhina Trust Mr Kalev Crossland for ANZ Bank of New Zea...

6. IO v SJ LCRO 84 / 2010 (1 February 2012) [pdf, 113 KB]

   LCRO 84/2010 CONCERNING An application for review pursuant to Section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the Auckland Standards Committee 2 BETWEEN IO of Auckland Applicant AND SJ of Auckland Respondent DECISION The names and indentifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. Introduction [1] Mr IO (the Applicant) made a number of complaints against law practiti...

7. MW v EF Ltd [2019] NZDT 1304 (4 December 2019) [pdf, 248 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 6 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2019] NZDT 1304 APPLICANT MW RESPONDENT EF Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. EF Ltd is to pay to MW the sum of $4,408.64 on or before 24 December 2019. Reasons 1. In August 2018, XK invited MW to join an advisory board for his company, EF Ltd (the company). The company designs and supplies management information s...

8. [2013] NZEmpC 108 Milne v Air New Zealand Ltd [pdf, 156 KB]

   ...AUCKLAND [2013] NZEmpC 108 [13 June 2013] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2013] NZEmpC 108 ARC 51/12 IN THE MATTER OF challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER an application for security for costs and/or stay of proceedings BETWEEN KATHLEEN ANN BEATTIE MILNE Plaintiff AND AIR NEW ZEALAND LIMITED Defendant Hearing: By submissions filed on 22 February, 18 March, 24 April and...

9. [2019] NZEnvC 180 Vortac NZ Limited v Western Bay of Plenty District Council [pdf, 283 KB]

   ...favour of the Council. The quantum of costs [15] The Council seek full indemnity on the basis that some or all of the costs would be met by the ratepayer. I consider that Ms Hill makes a strong case to support this. 5 [16] The lack of proper information in the application for interim enforcement order and broad assertions contained in the affidavits required the Council to examine the matter in relatively comprehensive detail. Assertions of illegality in particular must be taken...

10. Wilton TRI-2021-100-002 Procedural Order 26 [pdf, 182 KB]

    ...LAKES DISTRICT COUNCIL Fourth Respondent AND HEMPEL (WATTYL) NEW ZEALAND LTD formally called VALSPAR PAINT (NZ) LTD Fifth Respondent AND WILTON JOUBERT LTD Sixth Respondent PROCEDURAL ORDER 26 (Sixth respondent’s costs application) 26 March 2024 2 Introduction [1] The sixth respondent has made an application seeking costs from the fourth respondent under s 91 of the Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2006 (the Act). The fourth responden...