Search Results

1. FU Ltd v TB Ltd [2020] NZDT 1394 (4 March 2020) [pdf, 104 KB]

   ...something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehearing, you can apply online, download a form from the Disputes Tribunal website or obtain an application form from any Tribunal office. The application must be lodged within 28 days of the decision having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Rehearing Out o...

2. MS v O Ltd [2024] NZDT 94 (19 January 2024) [pdf, 198 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 94 APPLICANT MS RESPONDENT O Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. In August 2021, a Japanese Company, F Ltd, sold a [vehicle] to O Trust and the vehicle was imported into New Zealand (the first agreement). The vehicle arrived in on or about 6 November 2021, but was not given a VIN number and so could not...

3. KC & TC v B Ltd [2024] NZDT 278 (16th April 2024) [pdf, 181 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 278 APPLICANT KC APPLICANT TC RESPONDENT B Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. TC purchased tickets for return flights for himself and KC to [Country 1] with the return flight having a short stopover at [City] in [Country 2]. The purchase was made directly from the B Ltd website and not through a travel ag...

4. BC Ltd v NQ Ltd [2024] NZDT 649 (5 September 2024) [pdf, 230 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 649 APPLICANT BC Limited RESPONDENT NQ Limited The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. In June 2021 BC Ltd (BC) entered into a general agency agreement with NQ Limited (NQ) in relation to premises in [suburb]. In January 2022 BC presented NQ with an offer to lease part of the premises from BU Limited. This offer...

5. LCRO 222/2018 TE v KT and RG (18 March 2019) [pdf, 100 KB]

   LCRO 222/2018 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the [City] SC [X] BETWEEN TE Applicant AND KT and RG Respondent The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. DECISION Introduction [1] Mr TE has applied for a review of a resolution by [City] SC [X] made on [date] in which the Committee resolved t...

6. Bell v Churton - Mataimoana (2019) 410 Aotea MB 244 (410 AOT 244) [pdf, 352 KB]

   .............................................................................................................. [48] Discussion .......................................................................................................................... [59] What are the applicable legal principles in this case? ................................................... [59] Who has customary interests in Mataimoana according to tikanga? ............................ [62] What is the status of Mr Churton...

7. LCRO 195/2016 AJR v BKT (29 October 2018) [pdf, 159 KB]

   ...discovery” and Mr BKT accepts that inappropriate disclosures were inadvertently made. 4 [17] Mr AJR describes these as disclosures of documents “of a personal, confidential or privileged nature” to other parties in the litigation. Mr AJR’s claims to confidence and privilege include correspondence with his solicitor BJK, his counsel Mr WO QC (who was named as the first of the nine defendants), and a range of other people including associates, friends and his wife. [1...

8. FI & IS v M Ltd [2023] NZDT 252 (7 June 2023) [pdf, 173 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 252 APPLICANT FI APPLICANT IS RESPONDENT M Ltd The Tribunal orders: M Ltd is to pay FI and IS $513.00 on or before 7 July 2023. Reasons: 1. FI and IS booked a move from [City A] to [City B] with M Ltd. FI and IS paid a deposit of $527.88 to M Ltd. Around 5 weeks before the move FI and IS cancelled the move and...

9. E Ltd v IU [2023] NZDT 516 (3 October 2023) [pdf, 195 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 516 APPLICANT E Ltd RESPONDENT IU APPLICANT'S INSURER (if applicable) X Ltd RESPONDENT INSURER (if applicable) Z Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. IU is liable for the damage to E Ltd’s van. Reasons 2. I conducted a teleconference hearing today. In attendance were LM (E Ltd’s driver), EU (E Ltd’...

10. BM & others as Trustees of D Family Trust v T Ltd [2024] NZDT 836 (4 October 2024) [pdf, 170 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 836 APPLICANT BM, YA and T Ltd As Trustees of D Family Trust RESPONDENT T Ltd The Tribunal orders: BM, YA and T Ltd as Trustees of D Family Trust are to pay $1,750.00 to T Ltd by the 25th October 2024. Reasons 1. TA, on behalf of the Trust, listed a property with T Ltd in February 2022 as a sole agency until May 2022. In February...