Search Results

1. LX v HO Limited [2019] NZDT 1428 (19 June 2019) [pdf, 113 KB]

   ...Use Agreement (the Agreement) that provided for payment for this installation. 3. Soon afterwards, the parties disputed the sum owed, and the company stopped using the site. LX has not yet been paid for the use of the land. LX has filed a claim seeking $8,010.00 for usage dating back to 2010. The company disputes the sum owed on the basis that it should only pay for usage in 2017 and 2018. 4. The issues to be resolved are: (a) How much is owed under the Agreement for 2017...

2. SJ & NY v XT Ltd [2021] NZDT 1644 (6 October 2021) [pdf, 206 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1644 APPLICANT SJ and NY RESPONDENT XT Ltd The Tribunal orders: SJ and NY are not liable to pay XT Ltd Services Limited the sum of $289.80, being a portion of the sum invoiced between February and October 2020. Reasons: 1. In December 2018 XT Ltd relocated the water meter for SJ and NY’s rental property at [addr

3. TQ v EN [2023] NZDT 113 (2 June 2023) [pdf, 192 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 113 APPLICANT TQ RESPONDENT EN The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. TQ bred [Dog], a [dog breed], and sold her to EN on 23 December 2021. The parties signed a contract which provided, at clause 5, that ‘The Buyer represents … that … Buyer will have the dog spayed or neutered by the age of six m...

4. XB v KI [2022] NZDT 226 (5 December 2022) [pdf, 198 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 226 APPLICANT XB RESPONDENT KI The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. In October 2022, KI placed an advert for a 2015 Mazda CX-5 on Trade Me. 2. XB saw the advert and contacted KI regarding the car. 3. XB met with KI and test drove the car. He purchased the car for $14,250.00. 4. X...

5. U Ltd v KG Ltd [2024] NZDT 477 (6 June 2024) [pdf, 93 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 477 APPLICANT U Ltd RESPONDENT KG Ltd The Tribunal orders: KG Ltd is to pay U Ltd $3,450.00 within 28 days. Reasons [1] U Ltd, represented by director SI, claims from KG Ltd, represented by directors LN and TF, $3,450.00 for goods and services supplied by U Ltd to KG Ltd. KG Ltd says that the work was not authorised, and that the price...

6. FT v O Ltd [2024] NZDT 693 (20 August 2024) [pdf, 132 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 693 APPLICANT FT RESPONDENT O Ltd The Tribunal orders: O Ltd is to pay FT $3,084.00 by 3 September 2024. Reasons: 1. Between July 2023 and May 2024, FT worked for O Ltd as a sales agent under an independent contract. She says she has not been paid her share of the commission due on the sale of [address]. 2. SI, the director of O Ltd...

7. [2021] NZEmpC 186 Restaurant Brands Ltd v Gill [pdf, 349 KB]

   ...Restaurant Brands Ltd [2021] NZERA 61 (Member O’Sullivan). a visa which would have enabled him to continue working for RBL, whilst at the time giving the impression it was; and had failed to be open and communicative with him by providing information regarding its intentions and by pre-emptively dismissing him when a replacement for his role was appointed on 14 February 2019. [3] The Authority held that as Mr Gill did not hold a visa which would have entitled him to work...

8. [2013] NZEmpC 27 Hall v Dionex Pty Ltd [pdf, 109 KB]

   ...NZEmpC AK [2013] NZEmpC 27 [7 March 2013] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2013] NZEmpC 27 ARC 66/12 IN THE MATTER OF special leave to remove Employment Relations Authority proceedings BETWEEN PETER DAVID HALL Applicant AND DIONEX PTY LTD Respondent Hearing: 7 February 2013 (Heard at Auckland) Counsel: Tony Drake, counsel for plaintiff Daniel Erickson, counsel for defendant Judgment: 7 March 2013 JUDGMENT OF JUDGE...

9. LA-familyproceedings-steps.pdf [pdf, 513 KB]

   ...proceedings involving adoption under the Adoption Act 1955 Granting Notes Application to Dispense with Consent (when combined with Application for Adoption Order) – Proceedings Step 1 The following issues should be considered before undertaking and claiming this activity: • The application to dispense with consent is a separate application from the application for an adoption order, and will be the subject of a separate hearing. • The s10 report from the social worker is su...

10. Armfield v Naughton [2014] NZHRRT 48 [pdf, 167 KB]

    ...Halls and their three children, the eldest of whom was three years of age at the time. 2 [2] Although initially on good terms, Mr Naughton and Mr Armfield had a falling out. This resulted in Mr Naughton installing a surveillance system in the form of eight cameras monitored from the television screen situated in the lounge of the Bed and Breakfast. Three of the surveillance cameras were installed down the side of the Bed and Breakfast adjoining the Armfield residence and were poi...