13124 items matching your search terms
IN THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2011] NZDT 295 BETWEEN AEB APPLICANT AND ZVT LTD RESPONDENT Date of Order: 30 May 2011 Referee: Referee Benson ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that the claim by AEB is dismissed. Facts [1] AEB sought a remedy on his claim that ZVT Ltd supplied different shades of bricks for a house which he built in Auckland. [2] Whether he was entitled to a rem...
...IN THE MATTER OF of a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN CANON NEW ZEALAND LIMITED Plaintiff AND BRENT HUTCHISON Defendant EMPC 255/2014 IN THE MATTER OF an application to file challenge out of time BETWEEN BRENT HUTCHISON Applicant AND CANON NEW ZEALAND LIMITED Defendant Hearing: On written submissions filed on 17 and 24 October and 7 November 2014 Appearances:...
...matter in a reserved decision dated 9 February 2015. 1 [2] On 5 February 2015 the respondents applied to dismiss or transfer the substantive proceedings on the basis that this Court did not have jurisdiction to hear what is essentially a civil claim unrelated to Māori freehold land. [3] In an oral judgment dated 5 May 2015 I concluded that this Court lacked jurisdiction. I reserved leave to counsel for the applicants to elect either the District or High Court civil jurisdiction f...
...provided WNO with an extensive release of information that it held about her, from which two pages of information were redacted. Oranga Tamariki provided WNO with a summary of that redacted information. [2] WNO subsequently made an information privacy request to Oranga Tamariki for that redacted information. Oranga Tamariki refused WNO’s request. [3] WNO claims that Oranga Tamariki’s refusal to provide her with the redacted information interfered with her privacy in breach of th...
...valuation, there was no evidence of any betterment and his evidence was a “major and unnecessary distraction”.4 YMCA submits there are no special reasons that would disentitle it to costs under s 90(3) PWA. YMCA accepts that the amount claimed was higher than what was ultimately awarded. However, YMCA submits the amount claimed was not unreasonably high having regard to the compensation awarded or the evidence before the Tribunal. There was no comparable market evidence f...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 6 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 58 APPLICANT SI RESPONDENT HD Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim by SI against HD Ltd is dismissed. 2. The counterclaim by HD Ltd against SI is proved and SI is to pay HD Ltd the sum of $14,145.16 on or by 5:00 pm on 2 March 2023. Reasons 1. SI entered into a secured credit agreement with HD Ltd on 07 M...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 6 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 243 APPLICANT QB RESPONDENT T Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim and counterclaim are both dismissed. Reasons: 1. QB and her fiancé booked a wedding package at T Ltd and paid a deposit of $17,000.00. The package enabled QB to opt out of some elements of the package and receive a reduction in the total price of the package. QB opted...
Place: Present: Date: Rotorua C L Wickliffe, Judge K W Lardelli, Clerk of the Court 25 February 2003 Minute Book: 81 OPO 18 Application No: A20010003959* A20010006816 Subject: Section: Counsel: Te Kaha B6X2 - Determination of ownership of house, Injunction & Restore Occupation Order 18(1)(a), 19,20/93 Mr Peterson, (Opotiki), for Caroline Brokenshaw DECISION On the 26th of June 2001, the Court received three applications from Caroline Brokenshaw with respec...
DE BRUIN V CANTERBURY DISTRICT HEALTH BOARD NZEmpC CHCH [2012] NZEmpC 6 [25 January 2012] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT CHRISTCHURCH [2012] NZEmpC 6 CRC 2/12 BETWEEN KEES DE BRUIN Applicant AND CANTERBURY DISTRICT HEALTH BOARD Respondent Hearing: on the papers - affidavit received 16 January 2012 - memorandum received 24 January 2012 Judgment: 25 January 2012 JUDGMENT OF JUDGE A A COUCH [1] This decision concerns an application to extend time for the...
IN THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL TRI-2011-100-000012 [2011] NZWHT AUCKLAND 33 BETWEEN MARIE LITCHFIELD AND GRAHAM WELLS Claimants AND THE COUNTRY COTTAGE CO LIMITED First Respondent AND AUCKLAND COUNCIL Second Respondent AND WILLIAM GEORGE TUNNICLIFFE (Removed) Third Respondent AND BLAIR ALEXANDER MELVIN (Removed) Fourth Respondent Hearing: 16 June 2011 Decision: 4 July 2011 PARTIAL DETERMINATION ON LIMITATION ISSUES Adjudicator: P