Search Results

Search results for claim form.

13124 items matching your search terms

  1. BX and ABC Ltd v YC [2014] NZDT 602 (3 March 2014) [pdf, 129 KB]

    IN THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2014] NZDT 602 BETWEEN BX APPLICANT AND ABC LIMITED APPLICANT’S INSURER AND YC RESPONDENT Date of Order: 3 March 2014 Referee: Referee Reuvecamp ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that the respondent YC pay the applicant’s insurer ABC Limited the amount of $15,000.00 on or before 31 March 2014 or as otherwise agreed in writing between the parties. Material Facts [1]...

  2. [2018] NZEmpC 80 Avondale College Board of Trustees v Maday [pdf, 246 KB]

    ...AUCKLAND [2018] NZEmpC 80 [17 July 2018] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2018] NZEmpC 80 EMPC 149/2018 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of an application for a stay of proceedings BETWEEN AVONDALE COLLEGE BOARD OF TRUSTEES Plaintiff AND CATRIONA MADAY Defendant Hearing: (on the papers filed on 19 June and 3 July 2018) Representation: P...

  3. BF v YU [2015] NZDT 742 (13 February 2015) [pdf, 65 KB]

    IN THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2015] NZDT 742 BETWEEN BF APPLICANT AND YU LIMITED RESPONDENT Date of Order: 13 February 2015 Referee: Referee Perfect ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that YU Limited is to pay the sum of $29.48 directly to the applicant on or before 6 March 2015. Reasons [1] BF went to YU Limited’s (‘YU’) premises in November 2014 to purchase a wall-hung basin. She spoke to one of th...

  4. ND & UT v HX [2023] NZDT 329 (2 August 2023) [pdf, 130 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 329 APPLICANT ND APPLICANT UT RESPONDENT HX The Tribunal orders: The application is dismissed. UT is to pay HX $1257.20 on or before the 24th of August 2023. Reasons: Introduction: UT and HX are neighbours at rural properties in [Town]. UT is the registered owner of a [dog] named A. The dog is cared for...

  5. OT v XQ Ltd [2024] NZDT 619 (22 August 2024) [pdf, 186 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 619 APPLICANT OT RESPONDENT XQ Ltd The Tribunal orders: A. OT is to pay $2,400.00 to XQ Ltd on or before 19 September 2024. B. There is a declaration under section 10(1)(b) of the Disputes Tribunal Act 1988 that no further sums are payable to XQ Ltd by OT, as at 22 August 2024. Reasons 1. During about March 2024, OT parked his c...

  6. CN v U Ltd [2024] NZDT 623 (17 July 2024) [pdf, 200 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 623 APPLICANT CN RESPONDENT U Ltd The Tribunal orders: Claim Dismissed. REASONS: Brief Details of Claim 1. On or about 20 August 2023, CN registered for the [event] in [city 1] to be held between [dates] . The rally was run by U Ltd . CN made her registration through a third-party website (FQ). Two or three days after registering h...

  7. HX v ZD [2024] NZDT 771 (4 October 2024) [pdf, 215 KB]

    ...or artificial watercourse or live fence, or any ditch or channel or raised ground that serves as a dividing fence”. Therefore, a hedge may be included as a “live fence” if it serves as a dividing fence between adjoining properties. 7. ZD claimed that the survey proved the stumps of the hedge were on his land, around 30-40 cm from the boundary line. However, HX responded that ZD had measured the furthest distance and other stumps were closer to the line. He also provided evidence t...

  8. IB v QY LCRO 242 / 2010 (10 February 2012) [pdf, 86 KB]

    LCRO 242/2010 CONCERNING An application for review pursuant to Section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the Nelson Standards Committee BETWEEN Ms IB Of [South Island] Applicant AND Mr QY and the partners of AEH of [South Island] Respondent The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. DECISION [1] The review Applicant is Ms IB who, via her counsel Mr M...

  9. HI v B Ltd [2024] NZDT 8 (29 February 2024) [pdf, 231 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 8 APPLICANT HI RESPONDENT B Ltd The Tribunal orders: B Ltd is to pay to HI the sum of $400.00 on or before 22 March 2024. Reasons: 1. In November 2023, HI was travelling to [City] with his family, which included young children. 2. HI had made a booking through a third party online booking platform for a one night stay a...

  10. IJ v BS [2024] NZDT 645 (17 October 2024) [pdf, 191 KB]

    ...something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehearing, you can apply online, download a form from the Disputes Tribunal website or obtain an application form from any Tribunal office. The application must be lodged within 20 working days of the decision having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Reheari...