13124 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 742 APPLICANT KU APPLICANT LU RESPONDENT D Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. D Ltd is to pay KU and LU $1757, on or by 5 December 2024, and must arrange to collect the dinghy from them. Reasons 2. KU and LU purchased an inflatable dinghy from D Ltd. The purchase was made through D Ltd’s website, and the particular dingh
225 Waiariki MB 63 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WAIARIKI DISTRICT A20190003626 UNDER Section 281, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Potikirua Incorporation BETWEEN HUHANA ARTHUR Applicant AND THE PROPRIETORS OF POTIKIRUA INCORPORATION Respondents Hearing: 8 May 2019, 212 Waiariki MB 61-70 (Heard at Rotorua) Appearances: C Bidois for the applicant Judgment: 3 December 2019...
LCRO 61/2017 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the [city] Standards Committee X BETWEEN CB Applicant AND DS Respondent DECISION The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. Introduction [1] Mrs CB has applied for a review of a decision by the [city] Standards Committee X which decided to take n...
...JIAN ZHANG v PANDA RESTAURANT LIMITED [2022] NZEmpC 139 [9 August 2022] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2022] NZEmpC 139 EMPC 238/2022 IN THE MATTER OF an application for a freezing order BETWEEN JIAN ZHANG Applicant AND PANDA RESTAURANT LIMITED First Respondent AND TAO ECHO FENG Second Respondent Hearing: 8 August 2022 (Heard at Christchurch via...
...details of the various repair costs as particularised by the Claimants. Consequential Damages [63] The claimants also seek consequential damages being interest incurred by the claimants with the cost of remedial work carried out at their request. There is a further claim for general damages. 21 Special Damages [64] In Taylor v Auto Trade Supply Ltd & Anor13 the High Court discussed matters pertaining to special damages. In that case, the Court al...
...was partly based on the pleadings of the parties in ARC 23/12, but also that the actions against Mr Roest and Ms Park could not succeed on the face of the pleadings in ARC 102/13. This application was opposed by Mr Matsuoka. [5] While these applications were progressing, the substantive proceedings in both actions had become bogged down in disputes over disclosure of documents. Such disputes involved not only the parties but non-parties, including members of a group of companies...
...something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehearing, you can apply online, download a form from the Disputes Tribunal website or obtain an application form from any Tribunal office. The application must be lodged within 20 working days of the decision having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Reheari...
...NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2024] NZEmpC 141 EMPC 384/2023 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application to dismiss proceedings AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for unless orders BETWEEN ANDREW BYRNE Plaintiff AND COVERSTAFF RECRUITMENT LIMITED Defendant Hearing: On the papers Appear...
...when he turned 65. On 24 August 2012, the Ministry wrote to the appellant advising him that he was required to test his entitlement to a benefit or pension from the United Kingdom. The appellant subsequently confirmed that he had sent completed application forms direct to the United Kingdom Pension Service (UKPS). The Ministry asked the appellant to notify it of the decision. [3] It appears that the Ministry did not follow up on the appellant’s application for a United Ki...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 385 APPLICANT OT RESPONDENT KI The Tribunal orders: KI is to pay the sum of $2,974.48 to OT on or before Friday 24 May 2024. Reasons: 1. In April 2022, KI (the supplier) visited the home of OT (the consumer) and quoted a price of $1,558.02 to apply film to some of her windows. The consumer accepted the quotation and paid a...