OP v PQ LCRO 32 / 2012 (16 August 2012) [pdf, 91 KB]
...agreement’, but that he had not received a response from the firm, and asked that his letter be considered as a cross claim. On 24 June 2011 the Registrar responded (cc’d to the firm) to say that the letter did not comply with the High Court Rules or forms, and the suggestion was made that the Applicant contact the (local) 5 Community Law office. (There is no evidence on the file to show that he sought this assistance.) [26] On 29 June the Practitioner then sent...