Search Results

1. GT v SGG Ltd & Ors [2017] NZDT 1047 (27 November 2017) [pdf, 83 KB]

   ...with the tiny house still only partially built. The liquidators, who are the individual respondents in this proceeding, included the trailer and build along with three other trailers in the sale of HKL’s business to a third party. [4] Ms GT now claims $12,737.05 from the liquidators and their employer SGG Ltd in damages for the conversion of the trailer. Issues [5] The issues to be determined are: a. Does the Tribunal have jurisdiction to hear the claim? b. Should the matter...

2. [2012] NZEmpC 64 Wade v Hume Pack-N-Cool Ltd [pdf, 76 KB]

   ...Act). Mr Wade ceased his employment 1 [2011] NZERA Auckland 548. with the company in 2005. Almost a year and a half after the March 2004 payment, Mr Wade notified the defendant of a further claim. This asserted that the 9 March 2004 settlement had been for the sum of $70,000 and so had been short-paid $30,000. Hume Pak-N-Cool Limited (Hume) did not accept that further claim and Mr Wade issued proceedings in the Employment Rel...

3. KH & KX v MX [2022] NZDT 63 (5 June 2022) [pdf, 112 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 63 APPLICANT KH APPLICANT KX RESPONDENT MX The Tribunal orders: KH ’s claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. KH and KX claim that MX sold them [the car] on the 3 December 2021 knowing that the wiring had been chewed by a rat and that this had damaged electrical parts of the vehicle. KH and KX says that the

4. XN v Ji [2019] NZIACDT 67 (1 October 2019) Sanctions [pdf, 186 KB]

   ...2019 seeks compensation for the loss the complainant has suffered. [16] Mr Chen observes that the application for residence was declined because the complainant did not provide evidence as to how she had acquired all of her nominated funds, as requested by the immigration officer. It is contended that the complainant had not been aware that this information had been requested. This occurred because the application was not undertaken by Mr Ji but instead the work was given to unq...

5. [2012] NZEmpC 156 Newick v Working In Ltd [pdf, 226 KB]

   DAVID NEWICK V WORKING IN LIMITED NZEmpC AK [2012] NZEmpC 156 [7 September 2012] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2012] NZEmpC 156 ARC 39/11 IN THE MATTER OF an application to strike out plaintiff's additional cause of action BETWEEN DAVID NEWICK Plaintiff AND WORKING IN LIMITED Defendant Hearing: 21 August 2012 (Heard at Auckland) Counsel: David Neutze, counsel for plaintiff Michael O'Brien and Courtney Walker, counsel for defe...

6. [2022] NZACC 149 – Hagar v ACC (29 July 2022) [pdf, 183 KB]

   ...Accident Compensation Act 2001] Introduction [1] This is an appeal from the decision of a Reviewer dated 29 March 2021. The Reviewer dismissed an application for review of the Corporation’s decision dated 28 July 2020 declining Ms Hagar’s request for “disability assist dog” training for a “disability assist dog” needed because of a covered injury. Background [2] Ms Hagar has an accepted sensitive claim and has cover for mental injury (PTSD) in relation to that clai...

7. ZH v Ma [2025] NZIACDT 30 (6 June 2025) [pdf, 311 KB]

   ...under the accredited employer work visa scheme, for no fee. 2. The signed employment agreement. 3. Passport, police certificate, household registration and health certificate. [8] Later on the same day, 12 March 2023, Ms Ma filed a work visa application (under the accredited employer scheme) with Immigration New Zealand (Immigration NZ). It was based on the employment agreement with A Ltd. [9] Ms Ma did not inform Immigration NZ of her engagement as an immigration adviser...

8. De Wet v North Shore City Council [pdf, 323 KB]

   Claim No: 2109 Under the Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2002 In the matter of an adjudication claim Between Andre De Wet and Annette Cornelia De Wet Claimants And North Shore City Council First respondent And Grant Hearle Williams Second respondent And Jason Thomas Williams Third respondent And Grant Hearle Williams and Jason Thomas Williams and Desmond Sarjant Williams as trustees of Aladdin Trust Fourth respondents And Anthon...

9. Hettig v ANZ Bank of New Zealand Ltd - Lot 1 Deposited Plan 158328, CT NA95A/121 (2014) 93 Taitokerau MB 238 (93 TTK 238) [pdf, 220 KB]

   ...MB 238 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAITOKERAU DISTRICT A20140012790 UNDER Section 19, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Lot 1 Deposited Plan 158328, CT NA95A/121 BETWEEN JOHN HETTIG Applicant AND ANZ BANK OF NEW ZEALAND LIMITED Respondent Hearing: 12 December 2014 15 December 2014 (Heard at Whangarei) Appearances: Mr John Hettig for Kaiawhina Trust Mr Kalev Crossland for ANZ Bank of New Zea...

10. IO v SJ LCRO 84 / 2010 (1 February 2012) [pdf, 113 KB]

    LCRO 84/2010 CONCERNING An application for review pursuant to Section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the Auckland Standards Committee 2 BETWEEN IO of Auckland Applicant AND SJ of Auckland Respondent DECISION The names and indentifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. Introduction [1] Mr IO (the Applicant) made a number of complaints against law practiti...