13124 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 318 APPLICANT TD RESPONDENT SS SECOND RESPONDENT UU The Tribunal orders: The claim against SS cannot proceed; and The claim against UU is dismissed. Reasons [1] On 27 October 2020 TD signed a contract with E Ltd for E Ltd to build him a house. TD paid a deposit of $23,500.00 on the same day. E Ltd was placed i...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 7 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 149 APPLICANT EL RESPONDENT IN Ltd The Tribunal orders: IN Ltd are to pay to EL the sum of $1,900.00 on or before 9 September 2022. Reasons: 1. In December 2021, EL engaged the services of IN Ltd to transport his personal belongings from [City A] to [City B]. 2. With the assistance of IN Ltd, EL purchased b...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 6 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 847 APPLICANT TH RESPONDENT N Ltd RESPONDENT LC The Tribunal orders: LC is to pay TH $3,914.17 by 30 October 2024. Background 1. TH separated from his wife, Mrs H, in 2007. He engaged LC to assist with the relationship property division. The work was mostly carried out by Mr O. Mr O drafted a separation agreement. 2. One of the...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 409 APPLICANT OC RESPONDENT N Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. In late 2023, OC used a service station at [address], operated by N Ltd. 2. OC put a product known as [exhaust fluid] in her fuel tank. [Exhaust fluid] is a similar product to [exhaust fluid 2] and is a diesel emissions fluid (“DEF...
...something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehearing, you can apply online, download a form from the Disputes Tribunal website or obtain an application form from any Tribunal office. The application must be lodged within 20 working days of the decision having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Reheari...
Minute Book: 127 AOT 25 IN THE MAoRI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AOTEA DISTRICT Place: Present: Date: Application No: Subject: Hearing: Place: Introduction Rotorua L R Harvey, Judge ~rMa-y -2003 A 19990008734 Waipapa 1 E1 F Part Lot 36 DP 28177 & Lot 37 DP28175 Turangi Township 31 January 2003 Turangi RESERVED DECISION This is an application dated 18 February 1992 by Land Information New Zealand or LI NZ ("the Applicant") pursuant to section 43...
...each of the respondents. Mr Kang is suing his former employer, Saena Company Ltd, alleging he was unjustifiably disadvantaged and unjustifiably dismissed from his job at the company’s Whangarei restaurant. [2] What has prompted these applications is the plaintiff’s concern that Saena is divesting itself of the restaurant business to avoid the potential consequences if the claim succeeds. [3] Mr Kang’s claim is a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relatio...
IN THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2016] NZDT 894 BETWEEN CZ APPLICANT AND CZC INSURANCE LIMITED APPLICANT’S INSURER AND XA RESPONDENT Date of Order: 25 February 2016 Referee: Referee Ashcroft ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that XA is to pay to CZC Insurance Limited the sum of $1,708.72 by 18 March 2016. Facts [1] On 26 September 2014 XA parked his vehicle in a parallel park on A Street, B. CZ intend...
...SUNIL KUMAR BALI Plaintiff AND SRG HOLDINGS LIMITED TRADING AS SUPER VALUE Defendant ARC 78/12 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of an application for security for costs BETWEEN SUNIL KUMAR BALI Plaintiff AND SRG HOLDINGS LIMITED TRADING AS SUPERVALUE First Defendant AND NZ LIQUOR MERCHANTS LIMITED TRADING AS SUPER LIQUOR Second Defendant...
...NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2024] NZEmpC 167 EMPC 443/2023 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for costs BETWEEN NICOLA WATKINS Plaintiff AND HIGHMARK HOMES LIMITED Defendant Hearing: On the papers Appearances: Plaintiff in person R Upton, counsel for defendant Judgment:...