Search Results

1. HL v UED Ltd [2022] NZDT 113 (7 August 2022) [pdf, 101 KB]

   ...BE Ltd and HL. 8. At the top right of the document is written, FC BDS (Otago), UED Ltd. This is followed by the address and contact details. At the top left is UED Ltd’s logo, which is owned by UED Ltd. Below that is the heading Orthodontic Information Sheet, then HL’s details. The treatment plan is set out, and there is a section entitled “orthodontic information and informed consent document”. 9. I note that the reference to “UED Ltd” under FC’s name is to the trad...

2. INZ v BUH [2013] NZIACDT 45 (01 August 2013) [pdf, 86 KB]

   ...Immigration New Zealand about the adviser, who is a licensed immigration adviser. [2] The Registrar has identified two grounds for referral, namely: [2.1] Incompetence; and [2.2] Failing to give proper advice to a client seeking to lodge an ill-founded application. [3] This arose out of two errors when making an application. First, the adviser claimed points for a complete qualification for a client when the qualification was incomplete. Second, she mistakenly claimed points for empl...

3. P and R v EQC and MIS [2024] CEIT-2023-0014 [pdf, 331 KB]

   IN THE CANTERBURY EARTHQUAKES INSURANCE TRIBUNAL CEIT-014-2023 IN THE MATTER OF CANTERBURY EARTHQUAKES INSURANCE TRIBUNAL ACT 2019 BETWEEN P AND R Applicants AND TOKA TŪ AKE EARTHQUAKE COMMISSION First Respondent AND MEDICAL INSURANCE SOCIETY LIMITED Second Respondent Appearance: E. Walton, and S Campbell, with P & R L. Clark, and L. King, for first respondent C. Hoeft, for second respondent...

4. BU & OZ v TF Ltd [2024] NZDT 330 (21 May 2024) [pdf, 242 KB]

   ...something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehearing, you can apply online, download a form from the Disputes Tribunal website or obtain an application form from any Tribunal office. The application must be lodged within 20 working days of the decision having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Reheari...

5. [2007] NZEmpC AC 43C/07 Service and Food Workers Union Inc & Anor v Spotless Services (NZ) Ltd [pdf, 12 KB]

   SFWU V SPOTLESS SERVICES (NZ) LTD AK AC 43C/07 23 July 2007 IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND AC 43C/07 ARC 39/07 IN THE MATTER OF an application for declaration and permanent injunction BETWEEN SERVICE AND FOOD WORKERS UNION NGA RINGA TOTA INC Plaintiff AND SPOTLESS SERVICES (NZ) LIMITED Defendant Hearing: 23 July 2007 (Heard at Auckland) Appearances: Peter Cranney and Anthea Hughes, Counsel for Plaintiff Shan Wilson and Katherine Burson, Counsel f...

6. Trustees of Taurewa 5 West Trust - Taurewa 5 West (2003) 128 Aotea MB 201 (128 AOT 201) [pdf, 79 KB]

   IN THE MAORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WAiARIKI DISTRICT Place: Present: Date: Application No: Subject: Section: Rotorua P J Savage, Judge I K Graham, Clerk of the Court 1 July 2003 A20020006854 Taurewa 5 West Trust 19,20/93 DECISION AS TO COSTS Minute Book:128 AOT 201 This civil action was hard fought and had dragged on for years through a series of hearings and orders. This order for costs is not made in relation to those hearings of course but they form t...

7. Te Rununga o Ngati Hine - Determination of dispute between Te Rununga o Ngati Hine and Te Rununga a Iwi o Ngapuhi (2011) 28 Taitokerau MB 217 (28 TTK 217) [pdf, 216 KB]

   ...(―1993 Act‖) and its related provisions. [3] Te Runanga o Ngati Hine (―TRONH‖) proposes that Ngati Hine withdraw from the Joint MIO established for Ngapuhi, which is Te Runanga a Iwi o Ngapuhi (―TRAION‖). TRONH has brought the current application because it says it is in dispute with TRAION over the withdrawal process under s 20. [4] At the same time as TRONH is seeking to withdraw Ngati Hine from TRAION, TRAION is promoting amongst Ngapuhi (including Ngati Hine) a pr...

8. [2022] NZIACDT 17 - SU v Murthy (18 July 2022) [pdf, 305 KB]

   ...qualification by the New Zealand Qualifications Authority (NZQA) but was late doing so. The complainant also says that Ms Murthy deliberately misrepresented to her when the assessment had been sought. It is further contended that Ms Murthy filed the application after her services had been terminated. [3] A complaint to the Immigration Advisers Authority (the Authority) was referred by the Registrar of Immigration Advisers (the Registrar) to the Tribunal, alleging that Ms Murth...

9. O’Hagan v New Zealand Police (Discovery) [2017] NZHRRT 51 [pdf, 297 KB]

   ...provide information, that the Police had failed to provide a response to Mr O’Hagan’s information request within 20 working days, and that there had been an interference with privacy. [8] The present proceedings were filed on 14 March 2016. In his claim, Mr O’Hagan stated the information he received on 26 June 2015 consisted of 200 pages sent via email and that he had no time to consider it in his preparation for the Family Court hearing. Neither did he have time to seek professi...

10. QI v KI & L Ltd [2024] NZDT 629 (11 July 2024) [pdf, 188 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 629 APPLICANT QI JOINT RESPONDENTS KI L Ltd The Tribunal orders: KI and L are to pay $2,645.00 to QI on or before Thursday 1 August 2024. Reasons: 1. In March and July 2019, L Ltd carried out engineering consulting work for QI which included issuing PS1’s and a PS4. KI is the company director for L Ltd. QI paid $1,725...