12972 items matching your search terms
LCRO 226/2010 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of Auckland Standards Committee 3 BETWEEN IX on behalf of ADG Applicant AND SC Respondent The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. DECISION Background [1] ADG is the tenant of a building owned by Mr SC’s client. [2] In 2009, the...
...Respondents Hearing: 17 March 2010 (Heard at Gisborne) Appearances: G Webb for the applicants J Bunbury for the respondents Judgment: 2 July 2010 RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE C T COXHEAD Introduction [1] The hearing of this application continues a long and protracted series of applications between these parties. This application was filed by Mr and Mrs Brownlie (the Brownlies) in 2008 following a previous long running dispute between the parties. [2] There...
...2010 (Heard at Gisbome) JOANNE BROWN HELEN MARY RENNER Respondents Appearances: G Webb for the applicants J Bunbury for the respondents Judgment: 2 July 2010 RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE C T COXHEAD Introduction [1] The hearing of this application continues a long and protracted series of applications between these parties. This application was filed by Mr and Mrs Brownlie (the Brownlies) in 2008 following a previous long running dispute between the parties. [2] The histor...
...NZEmpC 124 [5 October 2011] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT WELLINGTON [2011] NZEmpC 124 WRC 27/11 IN THE MATTER OF an application for a freezing order and an ancillary order BETWEEN JAIME MELGAREJO AMIEN, OF SAN DIEGO, USA Applicant AND KARL HEINZ REIPEN First Respondent AND AWAKINO FORTUNE LTD Second Respondent AND BAILEY INGHAM LTD Third Respondent Hearing: (on the papers) Appearances: Kate Hay, counsel for the applicant Judgm...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 145 APPLICANT NW RESPONDENT B Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 2. NW booked fights for her family of four with B Ltd for departure on 17 March 2021 at 6.30am from [City A], arriving 7.45am at [City B], and connecting with a K flight leaving [City B] at 10.10am for [City C]. 3. At 8.21pm on...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 110 APPLICANT SH RESPONDENT TS The Tribunal orders: 1. TS is to pay $2,500.00 to SH on or before Friday 16 September 2022. 2. Within 21 consecutive days of SH receiving the money in full, TS may collect the [vehicle] at his sole cost. SH is to ensure the vehicle is reasonably available for collection during normal...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 77 APPLICANT NN RESPONDENT US The Tribunal orders: US is to pay NN $1964.75 by 18 February 2024 and may be paid into account [redacted]. Reasons: 1. On 11 June 2023, NN purchased a [vehicle 1] from US by paying him $2000 in cash and giving him a [vehicle 2] (with an agreed value of $2500). NN had seen the car advertised [online]...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2019] NZDT 1469 APPLICANT TM RESPONDENT DD The Tribunal hereby orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. In July 2018, TM purchased a horse known as T from DD for $10,000. 2. T was transported to TM in [Redacted]. 3. In October 2018, TM contacted DD and indicated that T was not walking correctly. 4....
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1599 APPLICANT EO RESPONDENT BD Ltd The Tribunal orders: BD Ltd is to pay $750.00 to EO on or before 21 August 2021. Reasons 1. EO ordered vinyl planks with a woodgrain effect from BD Ltd (‘BD’) in October 2020 based on a sample plank supplied to her. She paid $1500.00 for the product to BD (and another $1500...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 85 APPLICANT MT RESPONDENT BX The Tribunal orders: BX is to pay MT $6,000.00 on or before 1 February 2024. Reasons 1. On about 31 August 2022, MT lent BX, his then flatmate, $4,000.00 to help BX with some medical expenses. The agreement, drafted by BX, included $1,200.00 for interest, $500.00 for a “convenience and rapid service f...