Search Results

1. DD v B Ltd [2024] NZDT 644 (5 November 2024) [pdf, 210 KB]

   ...something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehearing, you can apply online, download a form from the Disputes Tribunal website or obtain an application form from any Tribunal office. The application must be lodged within 20 working days of the decision having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Rehea...

2. [2022] NZIACDT 28 - DD v Pabellon (15 November 2022) [pdf, 205 KB]

   ...Registrar: Self-represented Complainant: Self-represented Adviser: E Fleming, counsel 2 PRELIMINARY [1] The complainant, DD, who was studying for a PhD in New Zealand, consulted the adviser, Alicia Pabellon, about residence. A residence application was duly made, but it was withdrawn when Immigration New Zealand (Immigration NZ) pointed out that the complainant did not qualify. In particular, Ms Pabellon had relied on a PhD when in fact the complainant was still studyin...

3. 2013 archive

   ...family legal support service Criminal case assignment report Legal aid forms Parole proceedings Legal Services Amendment Act 2013 - 2 September 2013 Changes to parole proceedings following Legal Services Amendment Act Duty lawyer - completing legal aid applications Criminal Procedure Act 2011 - 1 July 2013 New criminal fixed fee and complex cases guidelines Criminal case assignment report Criminal Procedure Act implementation Legal Aid: Criminal Procedure Act 2011 consultation response on chang...

   Located in:

   1. About >
   2. Lawyers & service providers >
   3. Legal aid lawyers >
   4. Whats New for lawyers providing Legal Aid

4. Dunn v Accident Compensation Corporation (Strike out) [2024] NZHRRT 41 [pdf, 238 KB]

   ...matters, principally that ACC had assigned a particular manager to his case, that ACC did not listen to him and dismissed his opinions, and that pressure was applied to him to comply with ACC directions. [12] On 3 September 2018 Mr Dunn’s review application in relation to ACC’s implementation of the Rehabilitation Plan was dismissed on the basis his vocational rehabilitation was complete. [13] In December 2018 Mr Dunn appealed ACC’s 3 September 2018 review decision to the...

5. Hearn v Parklane Investments Limited [pdf, 105 KB]

   ...Hearn & Ors v Parklane Investments Limited & Ors – INTERIM DECISION File No: TRI 2008-101-000045/ DBH 05356 Court: WHT Adjudicator: R Pitchforth Date of Decision: 30 April 2009 Background This is an interim determination relating to a claim filed by the trustees of the A Hearn Family Trust (the Trust). The Trust sought redress from the following parties believed to be responsible for their leaky unit: First respondent: Parklane Investments Limited (Parklane) –previous...

6. LCRO 185/2020 BC v DE and FG decision & minute (20 May 2021 & 30 April 2021) [pdf, 201 KB]

   ...been made on 6 May 2020. [12] In early June 2020 Ms BC wrote to Ms DE complaining that the latter had not provided documents to her as required by the procedural directions. She referred to the Privacy Act 1993, and made an information privacy request for release to her of a large number of documents held by RL. [13] Ms BC also asked the ERA to intervene in connection with her information privacy request, but was informed that it did not have the jurisdiction to make the release...

7. Liufau v Lelatu [2014] NZIACDT 43 (31 March 2014) [pdf, 119 KB]

   ...March 2014 2 DECISION Introduction [1] The Complainant was in New Zealand unlawfully and sought the Adviser’s assistance to apply for a visa. He agreed, the Complainant paid fees and after a long delay the Adviser lodged an application. [2] The complaint is that the Adviser did not have a written agreement and his conduct lacked care and diligence. [3] The Adviser did not dispute the facts, but said he had met his professional obligations. [4] The Tribunal has...

8. Rafiq v Commissioner of Inland Revenue [2012] NZHRRT 12 [pdf, 106 KB]

   1 IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2012] NZHRRT 12 Reference No. HRRT 027/2011 IN THE MATTER OF A CLAIM UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT 1993 BETWEEN RAZDAN RAFIQ PLAINTIFF AND COMMISSIONER OF INLAND REVENUE DEFENDANT AT WELLINGTON BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines QC, Chairperson Dr S Hickey, Member Dr A Trlin, Member REPRESENTATION: Mr Rafiq in person (no appearance) Mr E Child and Mr T Hallett-Hook for Defendant DATE OF HEARING: 11 A...

9. Berry v Rondel LCRO 130 / 2011 (26 April 2012) - Penalty Decision [pdf, 143 KB]

   LCRO 130/2011 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of Auckland Standards Committee 5 BETWEEN ROSALIE J BERRY Applicant AND ROBERT J RONDEL Respondent All names and identifying details other than the parties in this decision have been changed. DECISION AS TO PENALTY ORDERS AND PUBLICATION [1] On 21 February 2012 I issued a decision as...

10. NG & DG v GI Ltd [2024] NZDT 213 (4 April 2024) [pdf, 98 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 213 APPLICANT NG and DG RESPONDENT GI Ltd The Tribunal orders: GI Ltd is to pay NG and DG $7,500.00 within 28 days. DG is joined as an applicant in this matter. Reasons [1] NG and DG claim from GI Ltd, represented by manager CK, compensation for what they consider to be defective bricks and brickwork supplied to him by GI Ltd. NG