Search Results

1. Bamber v Monschau - Tahorakuri A No 1 Sec 33A 2 (2019) 218 Waiariki MB 292 (218 WAR 292) [pdf, 415 KB]

   ...IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WAIARIKI DISTRICT A20180001436 UNDER Section 240, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Tahorakuri A No 1 Sec 33A 2 Block BETWEEN AARON BRUCE ANDERSON BAMBER Applicant AND SHANE MONSCHAU AND HARRY TE NGARU AS MAJORITY TRUSTEES OF TAHORAKURI A NO 1 SEC 33A2 TRUST Respondent A20180006521 UNDER IN THE MATTER OF BETWEEN Section 240, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 199...

2. [2010] NZEmpC 10 Snowdon v Radio New Zealand Ltd [pdf, 147 KB]

   LYNNE FRANCES SNOWDON V RADIO NEW ZEALAND LIMITED WN [2010] NZEMPC 10 [24 February 2010] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT WELLINGTON [2010] NZEMPC 10 WRC 8/09 IN THE MATTER OF an application for orders setting aside findings, orders and directions relating to discovery AND IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to objection to disclosure AND IN THE MATTER OF an application by the defendant to adduce affidavit evidence BETWEEN LYNNE FRANCES SNOWDON Plaintiff...

3. IAA v Sparks [2013] NZIACDT 5 (07 February 2013) [pdf, 170 KB]

   ...immigration and recruitment services. [51] The usual practice was to have Skype interviews so BIL could promote the client to New Zealand employers. Greenfields would gather information so that BIL could process the clients’ immigration and employment applications. 7 [52] When the visa to work in New Zealand was approved, there were Philippines’ regulatory requirements. Greenfields was obliged to ensure that the engagement was genuine and the employee had the prot...

4. E & F Ltd v TA Ltd [2018] NZDT 1594 (3 April 2018) [pdf, 197 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2018] NZDT 1594 APPLICANT E & F Ltd RESPONDENT TA Ltd SECOND RESPONDENT WM Ltd APPLICANT'S INSURER J Ltd The Tribunal hereby orders: 1. The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. E & F Ltd owns a horticulture business. E & F Ltd alleges that on 18 December 2015 an aircraft owned by TA...

5. BT & NS v Q Ltd [2023] NZDT 66 (26 April 2023) [pdf, 205 KB]

   ...something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehearing, you can apply online, download a form from the Disputes Tribunal website or obtain an application form from any Tribunal office. The application must be lodged within 20 working days of the decision having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Reheari...

6. TN v SH [2024] NZDT 569 (5 July 2024) [pdf, 205 KB]

   ...unwarranted vehicle, which I believe to also be uninsured, and had an expired license. 6. The issues to be resolved are: a. Did damage result from TH’s failure to take reasonable care? b. If so, is TN entitled to compensation of $20,000.00 as claimed, or to any other sum? c. Did BN contribute in any way to the collision or damage, and if so, does that affect the right to claim loss? Did damage result from TH’s failure to take reasonable care? 7. Under the law of negligenc...

7. TC v X Ltd & I Ltd [2024] NZDT 706 (4 September 2024) [pdf, 135 KB]

   Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 706 APPLICANT TC FIRST RESPONDENT X Ltd SECOND RESPONDENT I Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed against both respondents; and TC is to pay $1334.00 to I Ltd on or before 2 October 2024. Reasons 1. TC purchased a new-build home from X Ltd in December 2019 with settlement in February 2021. 2. In December 2023, TC...

8. [2025] NZIACDT 21 – KA v Wen (5 March 2025) [pdf, 197 KB]

   ...Dated 5 March 2025 REPRESENTATION: Registrar: Self-represented Complainants: No appearance Adviser: Self-represented 2 PRELIMINARY [1] The adviser had no contact with the client on whose behalf she made a visa application. She communicated with an unlicensed agent who ostensibly represented her client. [2] Two complaints concerning the client have been made against the adviser to the Immigration Advisers Authority (the Authority). The first was...

9. River Oaks Farm Ltd & Ors as Trustees of Ingodwe Trust v Olsson [pdf, 24 KB]

   SUMMARY Case: River Oaks Farm Ltd & Ors v Olsson & Ors (Ingodwe Trust) File No: TRI 2008-101-000052/DBH 05463 Court: WHT Adjudicator: CB Ruthe Date of Decision: 5 August 2009 Background The claimants are the trustees of the Ingodwe Trust that owns the subject property. About a year after the property was purchased, the claimants noticed a leak. The first WHRS assessor's report was completed in 2005 indicating minor problems with remedial work estimated at $1

10. CM v EC LCRO 295 / 2011 (17 October 2013) [pdf, 148 KB]

    ...complaint, and included the following background information (gleaned from attached documents) which was helpful in discerning the issues. [12] The Applicant is a Chinese national, who was then residing in New Zealand. Sometime during 2010, at the request of friend (also Chinese) the Applicant offered to assist two Chinese women who needed transit visas to travel through Australia. He obtained the women’s passports, and on their behalf completed the appropriate declarations f...