Search Results

1. LCRO 215/2020 YY v RN (27 September 2021) [pdf, 207 KB]

   ...purchaser; and (b) advised the sale price that had been agreed; and (c) recorded that no deposit was to be paid; and (d) recorded that settlement date was to occur 14 days after confirming the agreement was subject to title and insurance/EQC claim transfers; and (e) confirmed that Ms YY (as purchaser) had secured finance and did not require a LIM report as she was the owner of all but two of the flats situated at [address]; and (f) recorded that there was a degree of urgency as...

2. Davis v Rogers (Final Non-Publication Orders) [2020] NZHRRT 31 [pdf, 150 KB]

   ...in at least two specialist law databases. However, the defendant’s evidence and submissions have clarified that his real concern is not such publication, but rather publication on social or other media of the allegations made in the statement of claim. THE RELEVANT LAW Human Rights Act, s 107 [4] Across all three of its jurisdictions the Tribunal’s power to make non-publication orders is conferred by the Human Rights Act 1993 (HRA), s 107 which is incorporated into proceedings u...

3. Chaiyapoom v Hu [2014] NZIACDT 78 (09 September 2014) [pdf, 143 KB]

   ...the money and accepts he failed to have a signed agreement relating to his client engagement. However, he says he is not responsible for either the defalcation or accounting for the missing funds. [3] Mr Hu also says that while he did prepare an application, he did not put a date on it, so was not responsible for a client relationship and did not require a written agreement. [4] He says the employee took the money outside of her employment, so it is a matter between the employee and the...

4. CN v L Ltd & U Ltd [2024] NZDT 493 (4 July 2024) [pdf, 221 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 493 APPLICANT CN RESPONDENT L Ltd SECOND RESPONDENT U Ltd The Tribunal orders: L Ltd and U Ltd are jointly and severally liable to pay CN $7,173.62 on or before 16 August 2024. Reasons: 1. CN’s chimney was damaged in the 2016 [Town] earthquake. In 2018, the Respondents rebuilt the chimney and installed a log burner w...

5. [2019] NZEmpC 89 Martinsen v Target International (NZ) Ltd [pdf, 218 KB]

   ...ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2019] NZEmpC 89 EMPC 5/2019 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application to strike out BETWEEN GARY MARTINSEN Plaintiff AND TARGET INTERNATIONAL (NZ) LIMITED Defendant Hearing: On the papers Appearances: D Purusram and T Pillay, counsel for plaintiff B E...

6. KQ & OS v TN Ltd [2024] NZDT 244 (25 March 2024) [pdf, 221 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 6 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 244 APPLICANT KQ APPLICANT OS RESPONDENT TN Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. TN Ltd is to pay KQ and OS $808.48 on or before 26 April 2024. 2. The counterclaim by TN Ltd is dismissed. Reasons: 1. KQ and OS booked TN Ltd to provide the decorations for their [pre-wedding events]. They paid TN Ltd a total of $4,167.60 for both

7. [2018] NZEmpC 143 Lorigan v Infinity Automotive Ltd [pdf, 316 KB]

   ...53. [11] Relevancy must first be considered with regard to the pleadings, since these define the scope of the issues before the Court. It is therefore necessary to describe the causes of action as raised by Mr Lorigan’s statements of claim. [12] Mr Lorigan’s first challenge is concerned with the question of whether he raised a disadvantage grievance within 90 days, as required under s 114 of the Act. According to his pleading, the focus of the issue will be on a let...

8. [2018] NZEnvC 173 Panuku Development Auckland Limited [pdf, 139 KB]

   ...ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO 0 AOTEAROA IN THE MATTER AND BETWEEN AND Decision made on the papers. Decision No. [2018] NZEnvC \ '7 3 of the Resource Management Act 1991 of a Notice of Motion under s 87G of the Act requesting the granting of resource consents for the necessary infrastructure and related activities associated with holding the America's Cup in Auckland PANUKU DEVELOPMENT AUCKLAND LIMITED ('PANUKU') (ENV-2018-AKL-000078)...

9. Carley (INZ) v B [2015] NZIACDT 96 (17 November 2015) [pdf, 179 KB]

   ...properly, thus allowing others to produce fraudulent documents in her name and without proper scrutiny. [3] Ms B’s response was to accept the documentation was fraudulent, but say she did not know that at the time. She said that when she became aware applicants were routinely supporting their applications with forged certificates and the like, she contacted Immigration New Zealand and submitted all documentation to an independent verifying body, which Immigration New Zealand trusted. F...

10. RC v LUD Group Ltd [2021] NZDT 1380 (20 April 2021) [pdf, 215 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1380 APPLICANT RC RESPONDENT LUD Group Limited The Tribunal orders: LUD Limited is to pay $19,523.70 to RC before 20 May 2021. Reasons 1. RC purchased a motorhome and cruise tour of North America from LUD Group Limited (LUD) on 5th August 2019 via its website. The total cost was $21,523.70 which was paid in f...